Stacia Hartleben wrote:
I just realized that this could work if you were to manually put the
\dn around all unicode text. This vaguely rings a bell about how
someone solved the CJK problem, but I can't seem to find the mail
right now...something like that CJK was solved by manually putting
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
I just realized that this could work if you were to manually put the
\dn around all unicode text. This vaguely rings a bell about how
someone solved the CJK problem, but I can't seem to find the mail
right now...something like that CJK was solved by manually putting
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
> I just realized that this could work if you were to manually put the
> \dn around all unicode text. This vaguely rings a bell about how
> someone solved the CJK problem, but I can't seem to find the mail
> right now...something like that CJK was solved by manually
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
So the combining character feature wouldn't help with Devanagari?
Yes, I don't think so, since you wrote that several characters need to be
put into the {\dn ...} command.
Georg
I just realized that this could work if you were to manually put the
\dn around all unicode text. This vaguely rings a bell about how
someone solved the CJK problem, but I can't seem to find the mail
right now...something like that CJK was solved by manually putting the
\being{CJK} command in
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
So the combining character feature wouldn't help with Devanagari?
Yes, I don't think so, since you wrote that several characters need to be
put into the {\dn ...} command.
Georg
I just realized that this could work if you were to manually put the
\dn around all unicode text. This vaguely rings a bell about how
someone solved the CJK problem, but I can't seem to find the mail
right now...something like that CJK was solved by manually putting the
\being{CJK} command in
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
> So the combining character feature wouldn't help with Devanagari?
Yes, I don't think so, since you wrote that several characters need to be
put into the {\dn ...} command.
Georg
I just realized that this could work if you were to manually put the
\dn around all unicode text. This vaguely rings a bell about how
someone solved the CJK problem, but I can't seem to find the mail
right now...something like that CJK was solved by manually putting the
\being{CJK} command in
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
I was looking at a previous mail that said you could edit a file to
put in Tipa codes...this got me thinking that perhaps I could do the
same for the Devanagari package.
However IPA and Devanagari are reallly different. A big problem
especially is the i vowel which
Doesn't this also mean that it will not work for TIPA? A previous mail
seemed promising but actually not all of TIPA is a one-to-one -
Unicode encodes diacritics after the character, wheras in TIPA they're
made similar to the Sanskrit (for example, \'e makes an accented e
or \c{c} makes a
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
Doesn't this also mean that it will not work for TIPA? A previous mail
seemed promising but actually not all of TIPA is a one-to-one -
Unicode encodes diacritics after the character, wheras in TIPA they're
made similar to the Sanskrit (for example, \'e makes an
So the combining character feature wouldn't help with Devanagari?
On 4/23/07, Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
Doesn't this also mean that it will not work for TIPA? A previous mail
seemed promising but actually not all of TIPA is a one-to-one -
Unicode encodes
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
I was looking at a previous mail that said you could edit a file to
put in Tipa codes...this got me thinking that perhaps I could do the
same for the Devanagari package.
However IPA and Devanagari are reallly different. A big problem
especially is the i vowel which
Doesn't this also mean that it will not work for TIPA? A previous mail
seemed promising but actually not all of TIPA is a one-to-one -
Unicode encodes diacritics after the character, wheras in TIPA they're
made similar to the Sanskrit (for example, \'e makes an accented e
or \c{c} makes a
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
Doesn't this also mean that it will not work for TIPA? A previous mail
seemed promising but actually not all of TIPA is a one-to-one -
Unicode encodes diacritics after the character, wheras in TIPA they're
made similar to the Sanskrit (for example, \'e makes an
So the combining character feature wouldn't help with Devanagari?
On 4/23/07, Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
Doesn't this also mean that it will not work for TIPA? A previous mail
seemed promising but actually not all of TIPA is a one-to-one -
Unicode encodes
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
> I was looking at a previous mail that said you could edit a file to
> put in Tipa codes...this got me thinking that perhaps I could do the
> same for the Devanagari package.
>
> However IPA and Devanagari are reallly different. A big problem
> especially is the "i"
Doesn't this also mean that it will not work for TIPA? A previous mail
seemed promising but actually not all of TIPA is a one-to-one -
Unicode encodes diacritics after the character, wheras in TIPA they're
made similar to the Sanskrit (for example, \'e makes an accented "e"
or \c{c} makes a
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
> Doesn't this also mean that it will not work for TIPA? A previous mail
> seemed promising but actually not all of TIPA is a one-to-one -
> Unicode encodes diacritics after the character, wheras in TIPA they're
> made similar to the Sanskrit (for example, \'e makes an
So the combining character feature wouldn't help with Devanagari?
On 4/23/07, Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
> Doesn't this also mean that it will not work for TIPA? A previous mail
> seemed promising but actually not all of TIPA is a one-to-one -
> Unicode
21 matches
Mail list logo
