On 2013-01-16, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2013, 00:11:05 schrieb Paul A. Rubin:
>> It's some sort of font issue. I replicated the problem with your
>> document here, then changed the Roman font from Palatino to Times Roman
>> and got the expected output. I suspect the mathp
Am Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2013, 00:11:05 schrieb Paul A. Rubin:
> It's some sort of font issue. I replicated the problem with your
> document here, then changed the Roman font from Palatino to Times Roman
> and got the expected output. I suspect the mathpazo package may not
> contain the needed glyph
It's some sort of font issue. I replicated the problem with your document here,
then changed the Roman font from Palatino to Times Roman and got the expected
output. I suspect the mathpazo package may not contain the needed glyph.
Paul
On 2013-01-10, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I try to convert
> CKI\varepsilon
> into
> mathrm, but that gives me CKI''
> Is this known, that greek characters do not convert, or am I missing
> something?
Upright Greek is a known problem.
* By default, Greek letters are treated as symbols, not
Am Freitag, 11. Januar 2013, 00:01:15 schrieb Paul A. Rubin:
> Works for me.
>
> Paul
Thanks, Paul
your example works here too, but not the original. Must have to do with my
setting (Koma script?)
Would you mind to try it out?
Thanks
Wolfgang
Test-greek.lyx
Description: application/lyx
Works for me.
Paul
#LyX 2.0 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 413
\begin_document
\begin_header
\textclass article
\use_default_options true
\maintain_unincluded_children false
\language english
\language_package default
\inputencoding auto
\fontencoding global
\
Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2012, 14:53:38 schrieb Guenter Milde:
> On 2012-01-05, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > I use
> > \mathrm{K}^{+}
> > to get an upright K^+ (K-Ion) (and other items such as units)
> > and guess the following message on the terminal from which I start lyx
> > has to do with it:
On 2012-01-05, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I use
> \mathrm{K}^{+}
> to get an upright K^+ (K-Ion) (and other items such as units)
> and guess the following message on the terminal from which I start lyx has
> to do with it:
> [Unknown [sub [mathrm [char E mathalpha]] [char e mathalpha][char x
But it compiles? I have tested it out of the box and it does so.
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann <
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> I use
> \mathrm{K}^{+}
> to get an upright K^+ (K-Ion) (a
Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> Wolfgang Riedel wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > if I type the tex code (for instance) for an unit of measurement 'meter
> > per second' "\mathrm{\frac{m}{s}}" inside a mathematical expression in
> > lyx (the frac was created via the mathematical menue) it seems correct,
> > the
Wolfgang Riedel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> if I type the tex code (for instance) for an unit of measurement 'meter
> per second' "\mathrm{\frac{m}{s}}" inside a mathematical expression in
> lyx (the frac was created via the mathematical menue) it seems correct,
> the dvi is okay. But if I leave lyx, sta
> "?" == <" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes:
?> Sure: In the following lemma (same problem with "proposition"
?> environment), there are the operators "exp" (standard macro) and
?> "dev" (own notation). Both are italicized in the PS-file.
exp is certainly _not_ in italics here. dev is indeed,
On 08 Nov 1999 11:11:13 +010 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "?" == <" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes:
>
>?> There are certain functions like sin, exp, etc. which are supposed
>?> to be written with non-italic letters even inside formulas. Usually
>?> this works (by using \sin or C-m sin). Ho
> "?" == <" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes:
?> There are certain functions like sin, exp, etc. which are supposed
?> to be written with non-italic letters even inside formulas. Usually
?> this works (by using \sin or C-m sin). However, in the Lemma and
?> Proposition environments (which italic
14 matches
Mail list logo
