Re: pybliographer

2005-04-12 Thread Simon Bock
Thank you for your answer, and sorry for the late reply - it somehow 
ended up in my spam folder.

Martijn Brouwer wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 12:30 +0100, Simon Bock wrote:
Martijn Brouwer wrote:
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 10:09 +0100, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I was asked by a colleague how to handle a MedLine search in order to insert 
selected references into pybliographer before piping them into lyx. 
[snip]
It is not clear to me want you want to achieve. Note that searching does
not change your database. I just shows only the entries that match your
search criteria.
Maybe I just do not understand what happens. Here is what I do; maybe 
this is just the way to do it?
1) I have my database opened and displayed in a pybliographic window.
2) I use the button Medline search, and perform a search for e.g. some 
author name list.
3) The pybliographic window displays only the search results.
I don't know whether my database has been closed or what.
4) I copy the good results to the clipboard.
5) I re-open my database file and paste the clipboard into it.

Is this the way to do it?
What I expected was a behaviour with my database and the search results 
being open, allowing to drag results directly to the database, or at 
least not the re-opening after each search.

That is what I use, but I did not manage to have multiple windows / 
reference databases in it.
What I know from the M$ world is one window to do your searches in, one 
window with your reference database, and you drag the relevant article 
out of the search results into your database.
Can this be achieved with pybliographic?
You want to store your search results in a separate database file? As
far as I know it is not possible. Why would you like this? If you want
No. I want to be able to integrate selected search results into my 
database and then forget about the reast of the search results.

Storing them in a separate database seems to be the easy thing to me, 
just hit the save button...

to make a database file with all citations used in some article you can
use the pybcompact script included in the package.
Thank you, this script can be useful.
Best Regards
Simon


Re: pybliographer

2005-04-12 Thread Simon Bock
Thank you for your answer, and sorry for the late reply - it somehow 
ended up in my spam folder.

Martijn Brouwer wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 12:30 +0100, Simon Bock wrote:
Martijn Brouwer wrote:
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 10:09 +0100, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I was asked by a colleague how to handle a MedLine search in order to insert 
selected references into pybliographer before piping them into lyx. 
[snip]
It is not clear to me want you want to achieve. Note that searching does
not change your database. I just shows only the entries that match your
search criteria.
Maybe I just do not understand what happens. Here is what I do; maybe 
this is just the way to do it?
1) I have my database opened and displayed in a pybliographic window.
2) I use the button Medline search, and perform a search for e.g. some 
author name list.
3) The pybliographic window displays only the search results.
I don't know whether my database has been closed or what.
4) I copy the good results to the clipboard.
5) I re-open my database file and paste the clipboard into it.

Is this the way to do it?
What I expected was a behaviour with my database and the search results 
being open, allowing to drag results directly to the database, or at 
least not the re-opening after each search.

That is what I use, but I did not manage to have multiple windows / 
reference databases in it.
What I know from the M$ world is one window to do your searches in, one 
window with your reference database, and you drag the relevant article 
out of the search results into your database.
Can this be achieved with pybliographic?
You want to store your search results in a separate database file? As
far as I know it is not possible. Why would you like this? If you want
No. I want to be able to integrate selected search results into my 
database and then forget about the reast of the search results.

Storing them in a separate database seems to be the easy thing to me, 
just hit the save button...

to make a database file with all citations used in some article you can
use the pybcompact script included in the package.
Thank you, this script can be useful.
Best Regards
Simon


Re: pybliographer

2005-04-12 Thread Simon Bock
Thank you for your answer, and sorry for the late reply - it somehow 
ended up in my spam folder.

Martijn Brouwer wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 12:30 +0100, Simon Bock wrote:
Martijn Brouwer wrote:
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 10:09 +0100, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I was asked by a colleague how to handle a MedLine search in order to insert 
selected references into pybliographer before piping them into lyx. 
[snip]
It is not clear to me want you want to achieve. Note that searching does
not change your database. I just shows only the entries that match your
search criteria.
Maybe I just do not understand what happens. Here is what I do; maybe 
this is just the way to do it?
1) I have my database opened and displayed in a pybliographic window.
2) I use the button "Medline search", and perform a search for e.g. some 
author name list.
3) The pybliographic window displays only the search results.
I don't know whether my database has been closed or what.
4) I copy the good results to the clipboard.
5) I re-open my database file and paste the clipboard into it.

Is this the way to do it?
What I expected was a behaviour with my database and the search results 
being open, allowing to drag results directly to the database, or at 
least not the re-opening after each search.

That is what I use, but I did not manage to have multiple windows / 
reference databases in it.
What I know from the M$ world is one window to do your searches in, one 
window with your reference database, and you drag the relevant article 
out of the search results into your database.
Can this be achieved with pybliographic?
You want to store your search results in a separate database file? As
far as I know it is not possible. Why would you like this? If you want
No. I want to be able to integrate selected search results into my 
database and then forget about the reast of the search results.

Storing them in a separate database seems to be the easy thing to me, 
just hit the "save" button...

to make a database file with all citations used in some article you can
use the "pybcompact" script included in the package.
Thank you, this script can be useful.
Best Regards
Simon


Re: pybliographer

2005-03-25 Thread Martijn Brouwer
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 12:30 +0100, Simon Bock wrote:
 Martijn Brouwer wrote:
  On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 10:09 +0100, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
 I was asked by a colleague how to handle a MedLine search in order to 
 insert 
 selected references into pybliographer before piping them into lyx. 
  
  I do not know much about Medline searches, but pybliographer can handle
  medline databases. Pybliographer is really great software, especially
 
 Sure, I did searches and they come back as expected. That's cool.
 But since I don't manage to get only one result back, I'm confronted 
 with e.g. 10 entries cluttering my database.
 
It is not clear to me want you want to achieve. Note that searching does
not change your database. I just shows only the entries that match your
search criteria.


 That is what I use, but I did not manage to have multiple windows / 
 reference databases in it.
 What I know from the M$ world is one window to do your searches in, one 
 window with your reference database, and you drag the relevant article 
 out of the search results into your database.
 Can this be achieved with pybliographic?
 
You want to store your search results in a separate database file? As
far as I know it is not possible. Why would you like this? If you want
to make a database file with all citations used in some article you can
use the pybcompact script included in the package.
 
  I have a 150+ article database (bibtex format) for my PhD thesis and
  with pybliographic I can conveniently manage it, search articles and
 
 Maybe I am just stupid - but isn't your bitex database cluttered with 
 search results after a search?

You can easily remove a  by right clicking on it search in the search
window. You can also perform a new search within the results of a
previous search by selecting the old search before entering a new one.

 Thank you for your opinion.
 Best Regards
 Simon
 



Re: pybliographer

2005-03-25 Thread Martijn Brouwer
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 12:30 +0100, Simon Bock wrote:
 Martijn Brouwer wrote:
  On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 10:09 +0100, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
 I was asked by a colleague how to handle a MedLine search in order to 
 insert 
 selected references into pybliographer before piping them into lyx. 
  
  I do not know much about Medline searches, but pybliographer can handle
  medline databases. Pybliographer is really great software, especially
 
 Sure, I did searches and they come back as expected. That's cool.
 But since I don't manage to get only one result back, I'm confronted 
 with e.g. 10 entries cluttering my database.
 
It is not clear to me want you want to achieve. Note that searching does
not change your database. I just shows only the entries that match your
search criteria.


 That is what I use, but I did not manage to have multiple windows / 
 reference databases in it.
 What I know from the M$ world is one window to do your searches in, one 
 window with your reference database, and you drag the relevant article 
 out of the search results into your database.
 Can this be achieved with pybliographic?
 
You want to store your search results in a separate database file? As
far as I know it is not possible. Why would you like this? If you want
to make a database file with all citations used in some article you can
use the pybcompact script included in the package.
 
  I have a 150+ article database (bibtex format) for my PhD thesis and
  with pybliographic I can conveniently manage it, search articles and
 
 Maybe I am just stupid - but isn't your bitex database cluttered with 
 search results after a search?

You can easily remove a  by right clicking on it search in the search
window. You can also perform a new search within the results of a
previous search by selecting the old search before entering a new one.

 Thank you for your opinion.
 Best Regards
 Simon
 



Re: pybliographer

2005-03-25 Thread Martijn Brouwer
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 12:30 +0100, Simon Bock wrote:
> Martijn Brouwer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 10:09 +0100, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> >>I was asked by a colleague how to handle a MedLine search in order to 
> >>insert 
> >>selected references into pybliographer before piping them into lyx. 
> > 
> > I do not know much about Medline searches, but pybliographer can handle
> > medline databases. Pybliographer is really great software, especially
> 
> Sure, I did searches and they come back as expected. That's cool.
> But since I don't manage to get only one result back, I'm confronted 
> with e.g. 10 entries cluttering my database.
> 
It is not clear to me want you want to achieve. Note that searching does
not change your database. I just shows only the entries that match your
search criteria.


> That is what I use, but I did not manage to have multiple windows / 
> reference databases in it.
> What I know from the M$ world is one window to do your searches in, one 
> window with your reference database, and you drag the relevant article 
> out of the search results into your database.
> Can this be achieved with pybliographic?
> 
You want to store your search results in a separate database file? As
far as I know it is not possible. Why would you like this? If you want
to make a database file with all citations used in some article you can
use the "pybcompact" script included in the package.
 
> > I have a 150+ article database (bibtex format) for my PhD thesis and
> > with pybliographic I can conveniently manage it, search articles and
> 
> Maybe I am just stupid - but isn't your bitex database cluttered with 
> search results after a search?

You can easily remove a  by right clicking on it search in the search
window. You can also perform a new search within the results of a
previous search by selecting the old search before entering a new one.

> Thank you for your opinion.
> Best Regards
> Simon
> 



Re: pybliographer

2005-03-22 Thread Simon Bock
Martijn Brouwer wrote:
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 10:09 +0100, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I was asked by a colleague how to handle a MedLine search in order to insert 
selected references into pybliographer before piping them into lyx. 
I do not know much about Medline searches, but pybliographer can handle
medline databases. Pybliographer is really great software, especially
Sure, I did searches and they come back as expected. That's cool.
But since I don't manage to get only one result back, I'm confronted 
with e.g. 10 entries cluttering my database.

the graphical citation manager pybliographic (pybliographer also
includes some nice commandline tools).
That is what I use, but I did not manage to have multiple windows / 
reference databases in it.
What I know from the M$ world is one window to do your searches in, one 
window with your reference database, and you drag the relevant article 
out of the search results into your database.
Can this be achieved with pybliographic?

I have a 150+ article database (bibtex format) for my PhD thesis and
with pybliographic I can conveniently manage it, search articles and
Maybe I am just stupid - but isn't your bitex database cluttered with 
search results after a search?

Thank you for your opinion.
Best Regards
Simon


Re: pybliographer

2005-03-22 Thread Simon Bock
Martijn Brouwer wrote:
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 10:09 +0100, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I was asked by a colleague how to handle a MedLine search in order to insert 
selected references into pybliographer before piping them into lyx. 
I do not know much about Medline searches, but pybliographer can handle
medline databases. Pybliographer is really great software, especially
Sure, I did searches and they come back as expected. That's cool.
But since I don't manage to get only one result back, I'm confronted 
with e.g. 10 entries cluttering my database.

the graphical citation manager pybliographic (pybliographer also
includes some nice commandline tools).
That is what I use, but I did not manage to have multiple windows / 
reference databases in it.
What I know from the M$ world is one window to do your searches in, one 
window with your reference database, and you drag the relevant article 
out of the search results into your database.
Can this be achieved with pybliographic?

I have a 150+ article database (bibtex format) for my PhD thesis and
with pybliographic I can conveniently manage it, search articles and
Maybe I am just stupid - but isn't your bitex database cluttered with 
search results after a search?

Thank you for your opinion.
Best Regards
Simon


Re: pybliographer

2005-03-22 Thread Simon Bock
Martijn Brouwer wrote:
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 10:09 +0100, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I was asked by a colleague how to handle a MedLine search in order to insert 
selected references into pybliographer before piping them into lyx. 
I do not know much about Medline searches, but pybliographer can handle
medline databases. Pybliographer is really great software, especially
Sure, I did searches and they come back as expected. That's cool.
But since I don't manage to get only one result back, I'm confronted 
with e.g. 10 entries cluttering my database.

the graphical citation manager pybliographic (pybliographer also
includes some nice commandline tools).
That is what I use, but I did not manage to have multiple windows / 
reference databases in it.
What I know from the M$ world is one window to do your searches in, one 
window with your reference database, and you drag the relevant article 
out of the search results into your database.
Can this be achieved with pybliographic?

I have a 150+ article database (bibtex format) for my PhD thesis and
with pybliographic I can conveniently manage it, search articles and
Maybe I am just stupid - but isn't your bitex database cluttered with 
search results after a search?

Thank you for your opinion.
Best Regards
Simon


Re: pybliographer

2005-03-21 Thread Martijn Brouwer
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 10:09 +0100, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
 slightly off topic: could somebody share his experience with pybliographer 
 with me?
 I was asked by a colleague how to handle a MedLine search in order to insert 
 selected references into pybliographer before piping them into lyx. 

I do not know much about Medline searches, but pybliographer can handle
medline databases. Pybliographer is really great software, especially
the graphical citation manager pybliographic (pybliographer also
includes some nice commandline tools).
I have a 150+ article database (bibtex format) for my PhD thesis and
with pybliographic I can conveniently manage it, search articles and
(nearly) everything you would like to do with citations.
LyX does not support Medline, but you can load your search results into
pybliographic, export as bibtex and LyX will by happy with your
citations.

Martijn Brouwer



Re: pybliographer

2005-03-21 Thread Martijn Brouwer
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 10:09 +0100, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
 slightly off topic: could somebody share his experience with pybliographer 
 with me?
 I was asked by a colleague how to handle a MedLine search in order to insert 
 selected references into pybliographer before piping them into lyx. 

I do not know much about Medline searches, but pybliographer can handle
medline databases. Pybliographer is really great software, especially
the graphical citation manager pybliographic (pybliographer also
includes some nice commandline tools).
I have a 150+ article database (bibtex format) for my PhD thesis and
with pybliographic I can conveniently manage it, search articles and
(nearly) everything you would like to do with citations.
LyX does not support Medline, but you can load your search results into
pybliographic, export as bibtex and LyX will by happy with your
citations.

Martijn Brouwer



Re: pybliographer

2005-03-21 Thread Martijn Brouwer
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 10:09 +0100, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> slightly off topic: could somebody share his experience with pybliographer 
> with me?
> I was asked by a colleague how to handle a MedLine search in order to insert 
> selected references into pybliographer before piping them into lyx. 

I do not know much about Medline searches, but pybliographer can handle
medline databases. Pybliographer is really great software, especially
the graphical citation manager pybliographic (pybliographer also
includes some nice commandline tools).
I have a 150+ article database (bibtex format) for my PhD thesis and
with pybliographic I can conveniently manage it, search articles and
(nearly) everything you would like to do with citations.
LyX does not support Medline, but you can load your search results into
pybliographic, export as bibtex and LyX will by happy with your
citations.

Martijn Brouwer