Re: [M100] Telnet BBS

2016-05-11 Thread MikeS
I trust that you'll post a prominent notice with proper attribution and pointing out that Club100 is freely accessible to all without having to pay you for the privilege... m - Original Message - From: Gregory McGill To: Model 100 Discussion Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 12:16

Re: [M100] Telnet BBS

2016-05-11 Thread Gregory McGill
I went ahead and took a mirror of club100 and will be making the areas available on thekeep.net's file libraries the areas will start with 100 Greg On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Gregory McGill wrote: > Being as most phone companies offer free long distance. I can

Re: [M100] Model T Progress

2016-05-11 Thread Chris Fezzler
It is nice to see new folks on the list and enjoying the Model T.  Club100 is an amazing and remarkable resources that I was happy to contribute to in a small way.  RIP my friend Rick H! From: Bill Nobel To: Model 100 Discussion Sent:

Re: [M100] Model T Progress

2016-05-11 Thread Bill Nobel
I might have to agree with you Ken, This was just a thought I had while writing the email. Drivewire on the client side does require a lot of background processing, thinking about it. Bill Nobel b_nobel@ hotmail.com > On May 11, 2016, at 9:18 PM, Ken Pettit

Re: [M100] Model T Progress

2016-05-11 Thread Ken Pettit
On 5/11/16 7:57 PM, Bill Nobel wrote: And for Ken’s response, yes a second protocol. It would mean replacing TS-DOS with the Drivewire client in the same format as TS-DOS as to comply with the Model T structure. Drivewire uses 256 drives of various sizes in a image format, with utilities

Re: [M100] Model T Progress

2016-05-11 Thread Bill Nobel
Oh no John, I am not saying there is a bug. TPDD loads and saves .BA, .DO, .CO files fine. I was meaning having to load a large ASCII basic listing from TPDD into basic. Instead of having to do it using ‘load “com:98n1e”’ from basic using Hyperterm. I have since learned after I sent the email

Re: [M100] Model T Progress

2016-05-11 Thread Ken Pettit
On 5/11/16 7:32 PM, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: The big advantage of TPDD with the Model T is Tsdos is a pretty friendly client. To really replace it would take some work or rewriting. Maybe you could swap out TPDD support for DW support in tsdos. Or even add it as a 2nd protocol with TPDD and

Re: [M100] Model T Progress

2016-05-11 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Wednesday, May 11, 2016, Bill Nobel wrote: > Hey All… > > I have to say I finally have a decent working PC interface with my > recently acquired 102 with 32k Ram. Thanks to Mike Stein, Ken Pettit, and > many others from this list. I always wanted one of these machines,

Re: [M100] Legacy

2016-05-11 Thread Willard Goosey
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:18:05PM -0700, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: > That's not Minicom's fault, flow control is handled in Linux kernel. And I can't deny that's where it SHOULD be. > > It just doesn't work with the M100 and it's small serial queue. That's > why I implemented HTERM with its

Re: [M100] Legacy

2016-05-11 Thread Willard Goosey
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 03:10:25PM -0400, Mike Stein wrote: > I suspect that this is the way everyone loaded programs back in 'the > old days' which is probably why the text-mode .BA files were normal > and didn't cause problems; kinda slow though, and you definitely > want proper handshaking...

Re: [M100] Listserv Setting

2016-05-11 Thread Chris Fezzler
Thanks all.  I see mine in the threads now and changed the settings. From: Mike Stein To: Model 100 Discussion Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 3:04 PM Subject: Re: [M100] Listserv Setting Whether your posts are echoed back and

Re: [M100] Null Modem Cable

2016-05-11 Thread Bob Pigford
IIRC, John Hogerhuis once recommended a factory made Belkin “modem cable” that worked well for me as a null modem cable. I have used it with ModelT <-> NADSbox and with ModelT <-> PC for mComm/LaddiAlpha, etc. These Belkin cables have model numbers like this: F2L088-01 (one foot

Re: [M100] Legacy

2016-05-11 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Willard Goosey wrote: > This of course does leave you at the mercy of whoever did the soft > flow control code for your terminal program. I've always used Procomm > under msdos and never had much trouble (that I can remember > anyway *). But my

Re: [M100] Legacy

2016-05-11 Thread Willard Goosey
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:12:32AM -0700, Gary Weber wrote: > Yes, you can do things like this from the BASIC prompt: > > Load "COM:98N1E" > > Then just initiate an ASCII upload of a non-tokenized .BA file (plain text) > from the desktop PC that you're connected via null modem, and voila, you >

Re: [M100] Legacy

2016-05-11 Thread Mike Stein
How often we forget that not everyone knows the things we take for granted... I suspect that this is the way everyone loaded programs back in 'the old days' which is probably why the text-mode .BA files were normal and didn't cause problems; kinda slow though, and you definitely want proper

Re: [M100] Listserv Setting

2016-05-11 Thread Mike Stein
Whether your posts are echoed back and whether you get confirmations are both account options, but I've noticed that every now and then they seem to change (actually, I don't think the settings change, but they are ignored). Some of mine also changed a little while ago... Account settings:

Re: [M100] Legacy

2016-05-11 Thread Willard Goosey
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 03:36:34PM -0700, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: > Legacy takes 15 minutes or something to generate the maze. When it decides > to crap out it is... unfortunate. Humm yeah I didn't really play it very long, level generation took up most of the time I'd allocated to M100

Re: [M100] Legacy

2016-05-11 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:24 AM, Shaun M. Wheeler wrote: > Holy crap, I didn't know you could do that! > > That would have saved me a lot of time and effort back in the day (before I > bought my NADSBox). > > -Shaun > Yeah with TS-DOS you would tokenize as you load with

Re: [M100] Legacy

2016-05-11 Thread Shaun M. Wheeler
Holy crap, I didn't know you could do that! That would have saved me a lot of time and effort back in the day (before I bought my NADSBox). -Shaun On May 11, 2016 2:51 AM, "John R. Hogerhuis" wrote: > > > On Wednesday, May 11, 2016, Gary Weber wrote: >

Re: [M100] Legacy

2016-05-11 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Wednesday, May 11, 2016, Gary Weber wrote: > > "download directly into basic"? > > Yes, you can do things like this from the BASIC prompt: > > Load "COM:98N1E" > > Then just initiate an ASCII upload of a non-tokenized .BA file (plain > text) from the desktop PC that

Re: [M100] Mdeol 100 FACEBOOK group

2016-05-11 Thread Russ Oechslin
One problem has been people sending SPAM to the list. That's NOT what it's all about. DA has been a real thorne in several sides. At 03:39 AM 5/7/2016, you wrote: > BTW, I'm not sure exactly what John's policy is regarding the bitchin100 list archive; insofar > as it restricts at least

Re: [M100] Legacy

2016-05-11 Thread Gary Weber
> "download directly into basic"? Yes, you can do things like this from the BASIC prompt: Load "COM:98N1E" Then just initiate an ASCII upload of a non-tokenized .BA file (plain text) from the desktop PC that you're connected via null modem, and voila, you can directly load into basic. Crazy,

Re: [M100] Legacy

2016-05-11 Thread Peter Vollan
"download directly into basic"? On 10 May 2016 at 15:33, Willard Goosey wrote: > Wow I'd forgotten what a PITA it is to have to download directly into BASIC. > To anyone who has to load ROG the old-fashioned way, i apologize. > > But LEGACY does seem to work. > > Willard > >

Re: [M100] Telnet BBS

2016-05-11 Thread Peter Vollan
Sorry, my bad. That is terrible, that they took that capabilty from you just cos of some dumb regulation. On 10 May 2016 at 12:42, James Zeun wrote: > No, my European M100 has a blanking plate over where the modem would be. > > But to be honest, I think I'd rather make use

Re: [M100] Telnet BBS

2016-05-11 Thread Peter Vollan
You have a modem, silly, your Model 100 has one built in. On 10 May 2016 at 06:51, James Zeun wrote: > Just out of curiosity, aside from saying linking my M100 to a RPi and > connecting that way. What other ways can the old M100 get online? I don't > have a modem. > > On