Mine refuses to work without RTS/CTS on. DTR is a must for TS-DOS. So it looks
like the 200 needs both enabled or both as a loop back.
Kurt
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019, at 4:33 PM, Jim Anderson wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > Agreed. TELCOM only uses XON/XOFF.
> >
> > I'm curious about
> -Original Message-
>
> Agreed. TELCOM only uses XON/XOFF.
>
> I'm curious about this so I'll dust off my 200 and do some testing.
Here's where I got to:
The flaw in my methodology was testing TELCOM with nothing plugged in (on the
assumption that if it isn't paying attention to
Agreed. TELCOM only uses XON/XOFF.
I'm curious about this so I'll dust off my 200 and do some testing.
Kurt
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019, at 1:21 PM, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 1:01 PM Kurt McCullum wrote:
>> __
>>
>> One test for the original poster. If you are using a
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 1:01 PM Kurt McCullum wrote:
>
> One test for the original poster. If you are using a full null cable, just
> enable RTS/CTS on your settings and give it a try. This would eliminate the
> question.
>
> I say this because my T200 gave me a few issues when I was developing
One test for the original poster. If you are using a full null cable, just
enable RTS/CTS on your settings and give it a try. This would eliminate the
question.
I say this because my T200 gave me a few issues when I was developing mComm.
The thing that was strange was I had to have RTS/CTS
" know TELCOM in the M100 ignores RTS/CTS, and I thought that was also
true of the T200"
TELCOM ignores RTS/CTS.
Many Model T programs require DSR signal or they won't send anything. I'm
not sure about TELCOM.
The other issue is the duplex. Half duplex, you see what you type. Full
duplex, you
> -Original Message-
>
> sounds like something's holding up the serial port, flow control
I forgot to mention, this happens even if nothing is plugged into the T200's
serial port. STAT string is 88N1ENN,O,T - I also just tried changing it to
88N1DNN,O,T for fun and it still behaves
sounds like something's holding up the serial port, flow control
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:33 AM Jim Anderson wrote:
> So I have been getting back into amateur radio this year (was licensed in
> 2002 but slowly fell away from the hobby with children, divorce, etc.)
>
> I'm sure I'm not the
So I have been getting back into amateur radio this year (was licensed in 2002
but slowly fell away from the hobby with children, divorce, etc.)
I'm sure I'm not the first person who used a model T as the terminal for their
packet radio TNC. It seems like an extraordinarily good idea for
