Re: SoftPC--the 68K Version (Was: Mac Emulators--Which?)

2003-06-03 Thread William Ove
on 5/29/03 9:30 AM, Darren at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :) when I joined this list I had 2.1.7 installed as a stand alone app running dos only because I couldn't figure out the cdrom driver and I had yet to install the pc compatabilty software onto the pc image. I made a new larger dos image

Re: SoftPC--the 68K Version (Was: Mac Emulators--Which?)

2003-06-03 Thread Darren
William Ove wrote: I went back and gave it another try and you were correct, 2.1.7 is working fine with my DOS hard drive file. Must have been some glitch the first time through. Hi, did you have success with using the clipboard both ways? I can go mac - pc but have trouble the other way. Glad

Re: SoftPC--the 68K Version (Was: Mac Emulators--Which?)

2003-05-30 Thread Darren
William Ove wrote: on 5/28/03 10:39 PM, Darren at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have softwindows1.0 68k 8 disks with the last image containing a bad header. :( Any help out there? Made with a quadra in mind. Also have softwindows 2 which appears to move to ppc. I was also thinking of my old

Re: SoftPC--the 68K Version (Was: Mac Emulators--Which?)

2003-05-30 Thread Gregg Eshelman
--- MUGWump [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Until recently, I only knew of the PPC-capable versions of SoftWindows and RealPC. Now I've learned that there were 68K versions of SoftWindows and an RealPC-equivalent called SoftPC, which have apparently passed into the realm of abandonware.

Re: Mac Emulators--Which?

2003-05-29 Thread Michael Dawe
on 28/05/2003 10:31 PM, Darren at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Be nice if it works, on VPC :) Suffered a communal fault on the drive D image, lost legacy again. :( Bummer! Anywho vpc4 is showing its colours, Vmac-dos runs at a very acceptable rate of knots. Startup looks better than booting

Re: Mac Emulators--Which?

2003-05-29 Thread Michael Dawe
on 28/05/2003, Gregg Eshelman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Michael Dawe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't have Win 9x set up on VPC. I installed it onto DOS and got the error message that it can't run from DOS. Which is a bit weird, as it runs from the CLI in a DOS window on 9x. My

Re: Mac Emulators--Which?

2003-05-29 Thread Michael Dawe
on 28/05/2003 1:44 PM, MUGWump at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 27/05/2003 10:34 PM, Darren at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Worm Mike? http://web.archive.org/web/20020208145419/http://www.emaculation.com/other.s ht ml Heh, I haven't looked at Worm for some time. I think I'll install a copy

SoftPC--the 68K Version (Was: Mac Emulators--Which?)

2003-05-29 Thread MUGWump
(I'm only top-posting so as to leave the background material appended; the older material can be deleted by whoever replies.) Until recently, I only knew of the PPC-capable versions of SoftWindows and RealPC. Now I've learned that there were 68K versions of SoftWindows and an RealPC-equivalent

Re: SoftPC--the 68K Version (Was: Mac Emulators--Which?)

2003-05-29 Thread William Ove
on 5/28/03 12:25 PM, MUGWump at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Until recently, I only knew of the PPC-capable versions of SoftWindows and RealPC. Now I've learned that there were 68K versions of SoftWindows and an RealPC-equivalent called SoftPC, which have apparently passed into the realm of

Re: SoftPC--the 68K Version (Was: Mac Emulators--Which?)

2003-05-29 Thread Darren
William Ove wrote: on 5/28/03 12:25 PM, MUGWump at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Until recently, I only knew of the PPC-capable versions of SoftWindows and RealPC. Now I've learned that there were 68K versions of SoftWindows and an RealPC-equivalent called SoftPC, which have apparently passed into

Re: SoftPC--the 68K Version (Was: Mac Emulators--Which?)

2003-05-29 Thread William Ove
on 5/28/03 10:39 PM, Darren at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have softwindows1.0 68k 8 disks with the last image containing a bad header. :( Any help out there? Made with a quadra in mind. Also have softwindows 2 which appears to move to ppc. I was also thinking of my old Quadra for use with

Re: Mac Emulators--Which?

2003-05-27 Thread Michael Dawe
on 27/05/2003 10:34 PM, Darren at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Worm Mike? http://web.archive.org/web/20020208145419/http://www.emaculation.com/other.sht ml Ok found it and a couple of others. :) Thanks for the tip. Heh, I haven't looked at Worm for some time. I think I'll install a copy onto

Re: Mac Emulators--Which?

2003-05-27 Thread Darren
Michael Dawe wrote: Heh, I haven't looked at Worm for some time. I think I'll install a copy onto VPC for a laff. It should run at least 2x as fast as a real Plus even on VPC :) Well on Realpc its workable under win95 but I think the classic runs rings around it. :) Better under vpc,