What happened to that user friendly environment? I guess it was nice
while it lasted.
Jerry Yeager wrote:
Allocating memory in OS-X can be done by the user, but it is not for
the faint-of-heart (smile).
Jerry
On Thursday, October 24, 2002, at 12:00 AM, Tony LaFemina
I would think the OS-X approach is really a little more user friendly
because it does not require the end user to guess at how much RAM the
software manufacturer really intended the application to use ratehr than
the bare bones minimum it need to get by with. (Sorry about ending the
sentence
Hmm,
If you were closer to the Cincinnati area (and soon the Indianapolis
area) you could find the jack-of-all-trades type people you are
looking for in the genius bar of the Apple store. {Not that the folks at
MacTown aren't very well qualified!!}
Best wishes in this, especially at
On Thursday, October 24, 2002, at 11:05 PM, Tony LaFemina wrote:
What happened to that user friendly environment? I guess it was nice
while it lasted.
I think the point Jerry had in mind was that users of Mac OS X don't
have to worry about things like micromanaging memory any more. As far
Allan Atherton wrote:
Tony LaFemina remacs at optonline.net wrote:
Allan Atherton wrote:
What should I do about corrupted fonts in Word?
I am using Word X under OS 10.2.1
I don't think you have corrupted fonts. I thing the program is getting
bogged down. Try allocating more memory to it in 10M
I don't think you have corrupted fonts. I thing the program is getting
bogged down. Try allocating more memory
I have 768MB of RAM, and OSX gives each application all the memory it wants,
on the fly, depending on whether the application is resting or working. So I
doubt that I have a memory
Jesse,
I'm far from a computer expert.that's one reason I'm so grateful for the
help of those on this list.
But, as a publisher, writer, editor and web-site content person, I can justly
say from observation whatever you write will be well written.
Good luck,
Jane Blake
The next meeting
Hello every one,
I am looking into buying a domain name for the LCS web site. I have ran
into some trouble. It would be nice to have WWW.LCS.COM its short and sweet,
but unfortunately another company owns that. The following list of names are
already taken:
lcs.com
lcs.net ?
lcs.us
I've never quite understood if LCS is anything more than the mac user
group.
mug-l.org :)
mug-louisville.org
loumug.org
loucs.org [which is untaken]
Hen
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Brian O'Neal wrote:
Hello every one,
I am looking into buying a domain name for the LCS web site. I have ran
lcs.org ...vDog
The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will be November 26
For more information, see http://www.aye.net/~lcs. A calendar of
activities is at http://www.calsnet.net/macusers.
Erm. is taken :) Loudonville Christian School since 1996
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, vDog wrote:
lcs.org ...vDog
The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will be November 26
For more information, see http://www.aye.net/~lcs. A calendar of
activities is at
Brian,
I frequently visit a new website named www.stevehoffman.tv. This is the
first time I have seen tv used. So, I suggest lcs.tv.
David Dudine
From: Brian O'Neal brimac at mac.com
Reply-To: macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:58:52 -0400
To: macgroup at
I'd be for maclouisville.whatever, myself. Or even
macgroup.whatever. (That'd go nicely with the mailing list, anyway)
Hello every one,
I am looking into buying a domain name for the LCS web site. I have ran
into some trouble. It would be nice to have WWW.LCS.COM its short and sweet,
but
I would recommend lcsworld. All major extensions are
available.
Bryan Forrest
Macintosh Specialist
LifeNet
http://www.lifenet.org
The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will be November 26
For more information, see http://www.aye.net/~lcs. A calendar of
activities is at
on 10/25/02 11:58, Brian O'Neal at brimac at mac.com wrote:
Just something that you feel would be a nice domain name for our web site.
And it doesn?t have to be a .COM
***On a side note, please refrain from using the word river. No
rivermacs.com, riverLCS.com. I think the area sports
I actually like the lcsmug suggestion.
Remember the KISS rule. The simpler it is, the easier it is to remember
and repeat.
rob
vDog wrote:
lcs.org ...vDog
The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will be November 26
For more information, see http://www.aye.net/~lcs. A
On 10/25/02 11:58, Brian O'Neal wrote
Hello every one,
I am looking into buying a domain name for the LCS web site. I have ran
into some trouble.
I think that the organization should have a .org ending, as we aren't a
company, but a non-profit organization.
Here are some available names
LMacCS.com, .org etc. For Louisville Mac Computer Society. Just a
thought.
Bernie
The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will be November 26
For more information, see http://www.aye.net/~lcs. A calendar of
activities is at http://www.calsnet.net/macusers.
Lee Larson wrote:
On Thursday, October 24, 2002, at 11:05 PM, Tony LaFemina wrote:
What happened to that user friendly environment? I guess it was nice
while it lasted.
I think the point Jerry had in mind was that users of Mac OS X don't
have to worry about things like micromanaging
19 matches
Mail list logo
