Re: Please DON'T

2002-01-25 Thread Ken Williams
On Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 10:17 AM, Cranz, Gregory wrote: I shudder to think of having to differentiate between both versions when debugging or having a conversation on this thread. I don't think anybody sane would advocate creating a whole new installation of perl just so that we

Re: Please DON'T

2002-01-25 Thread Chris Nandor
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory Cranz) wrote: Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl. IMHO, MacPerl was a stopgap that kept the Mac in the game until we've got OS/X i.e. Un*x to work with. Do you mean the purpose of the existence of MacPerl, or the purpose it

Re: Please DON'T

2002-01-25 Thread Bohdan Peter Rekshynskyj
At 13:42 -0500 1/25/2002, Chris Nandor wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory Cranz) wrote: Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl. IMHO, MacPerl was a stopgap that kept the Mac in the game until we've got OS/X i.e. Un*x to work with. Do you mean the

Re: Error on installation

2002-01-25 Thread Martin Redington
Remove the references to xmlwf from the Makefile. xmlwf is an application that uses expat to check xml files for well-formedness. You don't need it to use the expat library. expat should then build and install cleanly. On Friday, January 25, 2002, at 10:38 AM, Jeremy Schwartz wrote: I am

GDBM_File

2002-01-25 Thread Nicolas Bertrand
Hi Anybody here who succeeded in getting GDBM_File to work in macosx? Nicolas

Problems compiling 5.6.1 on MacOSX 10.1.2

2002-01-25 Thread Nicolas Bertrand
hi I have realized that GDBM_File may not be used unless perl is reinstalled on my system after installing gdbm. I have installed gdbm and am at the stage where I am reinstalling perl 5.6.1. I have followed at the instructions at http://duke.usask.ca/~dalglb/macosx/Perl_5.6.html I did get