Re: Module regression

2004-11-17 Thread Phil Dobbin
On 17/11/2004 @ 16:29 GMT, Ken Williams, [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote: [...] >Oh. =) In that case, removing based on the packlist is probably fairly >reasonable (using a package manager would still be preferable, but >admittedly almost nobody does that for installing perl modules). > >To see which

Re: Module regression

2004-11-17 Thread Ken Williams
On Nov 17, 2004, at 3:38 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote: On 16/11/2004 @ 02:32 GMT, Ken Williams, [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote: On Nov 16, 2004, at 3:47 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote: I need to step back a version in a module compliled from source (from v.3.0 -> v.2.0). What's the best way to go about this (again compi

Re: Module regression

2004-11-17 Thread Phil Dobbin
On 16/11/2004 @ 02:32 GMT, Ken Williams, [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote: >On Nov 16, 2004, at 3:47 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote: > >> I need to step back a version in a module compliled from source (from >> v.3.0 -> v.2.0). >> >> What's the best way to go about this (again compiling from source >> rather tha

Re: Module regression

2004-11-16 Thread Ken Williams
On Nov 16, 2004, at 3:47 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote: I need to step back a version in a module compliled from source (from v.3.0 -> v.2.0). What's the best way to go about this (again compiling from source rather than cpan)? * The best way to do this is to have a backup of the previous system with v

Module regression

2004-11-16 Thread Phil Dobbin
I need to step back a version in a module compliled from source (from v.3.0 -> v.2.0). What's the best way to go about this (again compiling from source rather than cpan)? Thanks, Regards, Phil.