Re: MacPerl Capabilities on OS X (was Please Don't)

2002-02-04 Thread Chris Nandor
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The version of MacPerl lagged behind the current release of Perl - I was > constantly porting stuff and finding out that modules like HTML::Table > wouldn't work because it required capabilities not in the MacPerl release. > To someone

RE: MacPerl Capabilities on OS X (was Please Don't)

2002-01-28 Thread CSBURRIS
, 2002 4:49 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: MacPerl Capabilities on OS X (was Please Don't) > > In article > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In the interest of stopping what looks to be a potential flame war: > > I d

Re: MacPerl Capabilities on OS X (was Please Don't)

2002-01-26 Thread Chris Nandor
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In the interest of stopping what looks to be a potential flame war: I don't think there's any flamewar brewing. Perhaps I was a bit too curt -- it was a long week -- but I just wanted to emphasize that MacPerl is a first-class Perl

RE: MacPerl Capabilities on OS X (was Please Don't)

2002-01-25 Thread CSBURRIS
In the interest of stopping what looks to be a potential flame war: As a long-time Unix (Solaris) SysAdmin and a Macintosh Bigot, I developed apps in both the *nix Perl and MacPerl. I really liked many of the capabilities of MacPerl (the open box, the droplets, the syntax checking from the edito