RE: canonical perl IDE for Mac OSX

2002-04-15 Thread Noe Arzate
How can I unsubscribe to this mailing list? thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 8:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: canonical perl IDE for Mac OSX Importance: Low On Sunday, April 14, 2002

RE: canonical perl IDE for Mac OSX

2002-04-15 Thread Thompson,Roger
the control key. I, in fact wish, that PERL was the extension language for emacs (over Stallman's dead body no doubt). -Original Message- From: Noe Arzate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 9:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: canonical perl IDE for Mac OSX How

canonical perl IDE for Mac OSX

2002-04-14 Thread drieux
On Sunday, April 14, 2002, at 05:59 , Bill -Sx- Jones wrote: dealing with corporate coding standards, you should try and make it easy to read. No exceptions or special cases, if it can be avoided. You want I had thought the x operator strange the first couple of times I ran over it...

Re: canonical perl IDE for Mac OSX

2002-04-14 Thread Bill -Sx- Jones
On 4/14/02 9:07 PM, drieux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there an Orthodox Perl IDE for OS X? It isn't silly and it isn't available... I just use BBEdit and am done with it; -Sx- :] My new personal quote: Be alert! The world needs more Lerts! :)

Re: canonical perl IDE for Mac OSX

2002-04-14 Thread Bill -Sx- Jones
Still others like BBEdit. They're even weirder. But I like them all. Not sure about vim, et all, but I know emacs and BBEdit allow you to 'automate' your coding environment to a high degree. BBEdit is, IMHO, the coders choice for programming in a multiplatform environment: MacsOS X are

Re: canonical perl IDE for Mac OSX

2002-04-14 Thread Chris Devers
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Bill -Sx- Jones wrote: Still others like BBEdit. They're even weirder. But I like them all. Not sure about vim, et all, but I know emacs and BBEdit allow you to 'automate' your coding environment to a high degree. Vim is scriptable, if that's what you mean. I'm not

Re: canonical perl IDE for Mac OSX

2002-04-14 Thread Bill -Sx- Jones
On 4/14/02 10:02 PM, Chris Devers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: access to such systems. BBEdit is Mac only, isn't it? It might integrate well with remote systems, but if it can't run on them natively then this isn't as useful to me, personally. Yes and we are getting OT here, but I try to 'stay

Re: canonical perl IDE for Mac OSX

2002-04-14 Thread Chris Devers
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Bill -Sx- Jones wrote: Yes and we are getting OT here, but I try to 'stay away' from the systems I program and/or manage. So you never manage or program on the box you're using? It's strictly a dumb terminal? Or do you drive it from the servers? ;) Plus, I like platform

Re: canonical perl IDE for Mac OSX

2002-04-14 Thread Puneet Kishor
hi, me and my very humble opinion... jEdit (www.jedit.org). On Sunday, April 14, 2002, at 08:07 PM, drieux wrote: Is there an Orthodox Perl IDE for OS X? no orthodox, but... works on every conceivable platform, supports every conceivable language, has every conceivable option