: Rich Morin; Mac OS X Perl
Subject: Re: OS X Installed numbers (Was Re: mac-toolbox)
Auto forwarded by a Rule
On 14/11/02 1:05, David Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 04:27 PM, Ken Williams wrote:
2) High-end users who are dying to switch, but need to wait
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Heather Madrone) wrote:
At 09:45 PM 11/14/2002 -0500, Kee Hinckley wrote:
Two possibilities.
1. You're used to some version of make which does cpan installs?
sudo perl -MCPAN -e shell
install xxx
I'm used to
At 7:58 -0500 15/11/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I for one, use Maya from SGI|Alias|Waefront - and it doesn;t
support 10.2 - there are a number of dialog boxen which get very
screwed up by it.
Are there any other packages which work under 10.1- not in 10.2+ ?
Yes, there have been quite
On Friday, November 15, 2002, at 02:05 AM, Heather Madrone wrote:
More to the point though, if you haven't installed the developer
package, you don't have a make at all--that may be your problem.
Which developer package would that be?
As others have mentioned, it is the Developer Tools CD.
At 10:36 AM -0500 11/15/02, William H. Magill wrote:
If you want to develop for Unix(tm), I would recommend using a
platform like Tru64 Unix, as it will teach you what Standards really
mean. Just because it was developed and runs on Sun, usually means
it won't run anywhere else. AND
Not to
On 14/11/02 1:05, David Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 04:27 PM, Ken Williams wrote:
2) High-end users who are dying to switch, but need to wait until
their software is properly supported, or until they can properly do a
massive switchover of
Hi, I'm Heather Madrone, and I just signed onto this list this
morning.
At 10:44 PM 11/14/2002 +, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Switch, whether from Mac OS 9 or Win32, definitely ain't happening here :-(
I just got a Powerbook a week ago, and I'm so disgusted with it that I'm
thinking of switching
At 8:26 PM -0600 11/14/02, Puneet Kishor wrote:
Also, which make do you use to get modules installed from CPAN?
no idea. Just say install whateveryouwant at the cpan prompt and
it does it all.
Please elaborate more on your problems. That is the only way others
can help you.
Two
On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 09:26 PM, Puneet Kishor wrote:
Perl 5.8.0 on OS X 10.2.x does have some problems in that it can
conflict with previously compiled libraries.
That depends entirely on how you choose to compile and install it. If
you install it somewhere other than
On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 07:17 PM, Heather Madrone wrote:
I haven't yet been able to figure out how to get the carbon build of
emacs (a gui emacs) to import the locale so that the perl debugger
will run under emacs. Any suggestions for the best way to handle
that?
GUI programs,
At 09:59 PM 11/14/2002 -0500, Sherm Pendley wrote:
On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 07:17 PM, Heather Madrone wrote:
I haven't yet been able to figure out how to get the carbon build of
emacs (a gui emacs) to import the locale so that the perl debugger
will run under emacs. Any suggestions
At 09:45 PM 11/14/2002 -0500, Kee Hinckley wrote:
Two possibilities.
1. You're used to some version of make which does cpan installs?
sudo perl -MCPAN -e shell
install xxx
I'm used to ActivePerl's ppm, which looks and feels a lot like ftp.
No need to make anything. Unix-style
On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 03:58 PM, Rich Morin wrote:
At 8:45 PM -0500 11/12/02, John Gruber wrote:
Even Apple admits that they expect only 20 percent of the Mac user
base to be running OS X by the end of 2002. It could be quite a long
time before that number gets to 50.
There are
On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 04:27 PM, Ken Williams wrote:
2) High-end users who are dying to switch, but need to wait until
their software is properly supported, or until they can properly do a
massive switchover of technologies in their business
You can probably blame Quark for
At 11:27 AM +1100 11/14/02, Ken Williams wrote:
On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 03:58 PM, Rich Morin wrote:
At 8:45 PM -0500 11/12/02, John Gruber wrote:
Even Apple admits that they expect only 20 percent of the Mac user
base to be running OS X by the end of 2002. It could be quite a
On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 06:06 PM, Rich Morin wrote:
There is also the group that is sticking to Mac OS for reasons of
caution.
I expect many of these folks to switch over in the next year,
however...
Some will also stick to Mac OS for a while because it's still faster
than Mac
There is a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. I started it some time
ago, for discussion of issues relating to accessing the Mac toolbox(es)
from perl. The rationale of a separate list is twofold:
* Discussions of the Mac toolbox are not necessarily specific to Mac OS,
or Mac OS X
* Keep
Chris Nandor writes:
There is a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. I started it some time
ago, for discussion of issues relating to accessing the Mac toolbox(es)
from perl. The rationale of a separate list is twofold:
* Discussions of the Mac toolbox are not necessarily specific to Mac OS
There is a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. I started it some time
ago, for discussion of issues relating to accessing the Mac toolbox(es)
from perl. The rationale of a separate list is twofold:
* Discussions of the Mac toolbox are not necessarily specific to Mac OS,
or Mac OS X
www.SecureShopper.com
1-417-546-5593
From: Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Pudge.Net
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:41:44 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mac-toolbox
(FWIW, I bring this up now because I am finishing up version 0.01 of
Mac::Carbon, which is a port of the MacPerl Mac
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jefferson R. Lowrey) wrote:
Actually, I wonder where the break-even point is for maintaining a separate
'MacPerl on OS 9/Classic is. At some point in the very near future, if it
hasn't happened already, the majority of Macintosh users will be
21 matches
Mail list logo
