Re: mod_ssl and libdbm

2002-11-21 Thread Ken Williams
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 11:58 AM, David Wheeler wrote: On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 04:50 PM, Ken Williams wrote: Another option: update src/Configure (in the apache distribution) to give a better hint for darwin platform, something like: DBM_LIB=-lSystem Nope,

Re: mod_ssl and libdbm

2002-11-21 Thread David Wheeler
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 04:10 PM, Ken Williams wrote: If you look closely, though, you'll see it says lSystem instead of -lSystem. It should be -lSystem. D'oh! I could have swarn I did -lSystem! But testing it again now, it's working with -lSystem, so I guess I didn't. Gah! I

Re: mod_ssl and libdbm

2002-11-21 Thread Ken Williams
On Friday, November 22, 2002, at 12:06 PM, David Wheeler wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 04:10 PM, Ken Williams wrote: If you look closely, though, you'll see it says lSystem instead of -lSystem. It should be -lSystem. D'oh! I could have swarn I did -lSystem! But testing it

Re: mod_ssl and libdbm

2002-11-20 Thread David Wheeler
On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 04:47 PM, Ken Williams wrote: Hmm - none of those are 'dbm', though. David, can you show/quote the page that claimed that dbm was a part of libSystem? I think that ndbm is it. It's what Perl finds when it compiles, and when I have gdbm installed, mod_ssl

mod_ssl and libdbm

2002-11-19 Thread David Wheeler
Hi All, I've been using mod_ssl with Apache 1.3.x on Mac OS X for a while now, and it works great. I've had to use gdbm to get it to compile, but that was okay with me. Now, however, I'm writing an article about this, and want to try to eliminate the gdbm dependency in the name of simplicity.

Re: mod_ssl and libdbm

2002-11-19 Thread Jerry LeVan
David [macjerry:/usr/lib]$ otool -vM libSystem.dylib | grep module_name | grep db module_name = ndbm.So module_name = db.So module_name = aliasdb.o module_name = printerdb.o Looks like something is there :) Regrettably I don't understand shared library syntax. Ie how to specify

Re: mod_ssl and libdbm

2002-11-19 Thread Ken Williams
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 08:06 AM, David Wheeler wrote: Hi All, I've been using mod_ssl with Apache 1.3.x on Mac OS X for a while now, and it works great. I've had to use gdbm to get it to compile, but that was okay with me. Now, however, I'm writing an article about this, and

Re: mod_ssl and libdbm

2002-11-19 Thread David Wheeler
On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 04:06 PM, Ken Williams wrote: Maybe what's required is just to keep mod_ssl from complaining about -ldbm (i.e. not search for it), and link against libSystem? According to this document from Apple (entitled ]Inside Mac OS X: UNIX Porting Guide), libSystem

Re: mod_ssl and libdbm

2002-11-19 Thread David Wheeler
On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 03:35 PM, Jerry LeVan wrote: [macjerry:/usr/lib]$ otool -vM libSystem.dylib | grep module_name | grep db module_name = ndbm.So module_name = db.So module_name = aliasdb.o module_name = printerdb.o Looks like something is there :) Regrettably I

Re: mod_ssl and libdbm

2002-11-19 Thread Ken Williams
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 10:50 AM, David Wheeler wrote: On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 04:06 PM, Ken Williams wrote: Maybe what's required is just to keep mod_ssl from complaining about -ldbm (i.e. not search for it), and link against libSystem? According to this document

Re: mod_ssl and libdbm

2002-11-19 Thread Ken Williams
Hmm - none of those are 'dbm', though. David, can you show/quote the page that claimed that dbm was a part of libSystem? -Ken On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 10:35 AM, Jerry LeVan wrote: David [macjerry:/usr/lib]$ otool -vM libSystem.dylib | grep module_name | grep db

Re: mod_ssl and libdbm

2002-11-19 Thread Ken Williams
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 10:50 AM, David Wheeler wrote: On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 04:06 PM, Ken Williams wrote: Maybe what's required is just to keep mod_ssl from complaining about -ldbm (i.e. not search for it), and link against libSystem? According to this document