On Saturday, March 15, 2003, at 05:13 PM, Nathan Torkington wrote:
And if anyone's wondering What Would Tim Do?, I think Tim would
want this thread to end so we can get back doing actual work with
Perl on Mac OS X.
yes, please.
And since I started this sordid saga, indulge me by letting me have
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 04:56 PM, Mike Schienle wrote:
Perhaps this quote will help you understand Randal's response.
In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didnt speak up
because I wasnt a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I
didnt speak up because I wasnt a Jew.
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 03:56 PM, Mike Schienle wrote:
Perhaps this quote will help you understand Randal's response.
In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didnt speak up
because I wasnt a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I
didnt speak up because I wasnt a Jew.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 12:07:33PM -0600, Lorin Rivers wrote:
Talking about PERL, folks.
No, that would be Perl or perl. See perlfaq1
Although, now that I think of it, does Inline::PERL work on OS X?
;-) ---given the length and nature of this thread PLEASE NOTE SMILEY.
dha, also thinks
On Saturday, March 15, 2003, at 05:13 PM, Nathan Torkington wrote:
And if anyone's wondering What Would Tim Do?, I think Tim would
want this thread to end so we can get back doing actual work with
Perl on Mac OS X.
yes, please.
And since I started this sordid saga, indulge me by letting me have
In a message dated Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Puneet Kishor writes:
5. I made the original posting on the list, not to any one person
privately. All responses to that should be made to the list.
This is an interpretation of netiquette I've never heard of, and I've been
on the net for well over a decade.
Trey Harris wrote:
In a message dated Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Puneet Kishor writes:
5. I made the original posting on the list, not to any one person
privately. All responses to that should be made to the list.
This is an interpretation of netiquette I've never heard of, and I've been
on the net
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 11:05 AM, Puneet Kishor wrote:
2. I did not mean any disrespect to Tim. Now I realize that some can
be offended by it, however, I would feel justifiably reprimanded
_only_ if the reprimand came from Tim. Many folks on this list had
harsh words for me, directly or
On 3/16/03 4:56 PM, Mike Schienle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didn¹t speak up
because I wasn¹t a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn¹t
speak up because I wasn¹t a Jew. Then they came for the trade
unionists, and I didn¹t speak
At 2:56 PM -0700 3/16/03, Mike Schienle wrote:
Perhaps this quote will help you understand Randal's response.
In Germany they came first for the Communists, ...
Protestant minister Martin Neimoller, reflecting on Germany's fall
to the Nazis
IIRC, a reference to Nazis is a definitive reason for
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 11:15 PM, Rich Morin wrote:
At 2:56 PM -0700 3/16/03, Mike Schienle wrote:
Perhaps this quote will help you understand Randal's response.
In Germany they came first for the Communists, ...
Protestant minister Martin Neimoller, reflecting on Germany's fall
to the
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 03:11 PM, Geoffrey F. Green wrote:
On 3/16/03 4:56 PM, Mike Schienle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Protestant minister Martin Neimoller, reflecting on Germanys fall to
the Nazis
Maybe that will help you reconsider if the reprimand was justified.
Now I'm offended. Jews
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 06:52 PM, Lou Moran wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 04:56 PM, Mike Schienle wrote:
Perhaps this quote will help you understand Randal's response.
In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didnt speak up
because I wasnt a Communist. Then they came for
13 matches
Mail list logo
