Re: Darwin darwin or darwin6.0

2002-11-18 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
Peter == Peter N Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Peter which in turn is stored in Config.pm, typically somewhere like Peter /Library/Perl/darwin/Config.pm or System/Library/Perl/darwin/Config.pm Peter this can be handy if you need to correct any settings (such as Peter library or include

/usr/bin or /sw/bin?

2002-11-18 Thread John Adams
I've been happily using Fink to install some of my software, and I'm considering whether I'd be better off putting Perl in /sw/bin instead of /usr/bin. Any thoughts, pro or con? Thanks, John A see me fulminate at http://www.jzip.org/

Re: /usr/bin or /sw/bin?

2002-11-18 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 11:43 AM -0500 11/18/02, John Adams wrote: I've been happily using Fink to install some of my software, and I'm considering whether I'd be better off putting Perl in /sw/bin instead of /usr/bin. Any thoughts, pro or con? I wouldn't do either. Leave /sw for fink stuff, and /usr/bin for the

Re: /usr/bin or /sw/bin?

2002-11-18 Thread Martin Redington
I leave all fink stuff in /sw/bin I put all my other installed stuff under /usr/local whenever possible I always try and leave /usr/bin alone. My path is set to something like ... /usr/local/bin:/sw/bin:/usr/bin The principle being to avoid any possibility of collisions between my stuff,

Re: Perl Package Problem

2002-11-18 Thread drieux
On Sunday, Nov 17, 2002, at 11:20 US/Pacific, Vic Norton wrote: [..] The VTN::Utilities and VTN::Sppd packages are here /Library/Perl/darwin/VTN% ls -l total 56 -rwxr--r-- 1 vicnorto admin 5427 Nov 2 16:26 Sorts.pm* -rwxr--r-- 1 vicnorto admin 2116 Nov 17 12:28 Sppd.pm*

Re: Darwin darwin or darwin6.0

2002-11-18 Thread drieux
On Sunday, Nov 17, 2002, at 20:22 US/Pacific, Peter N Lewis wrote: At 11:39 -0800 16/11/02, drieux wrote: [jeeves: 1:] perl -MConfig -e 'print $Config{osname} \n; ' As for how this gets set - it gets set when your version of perl is built for that specific OS. which in turn is stored in

Re: /usr/bin or /sw/bin?

2002-11-18 Thread drieux
On Monday, Nov 18, 2002, at 08:43 US/Pacific, John Adams wrote: I've been happily using Fink to install some of my software, and I'm considering whether I'd be better off putting Perl in /sw/bin instead of /usr/bin. Any thoughts, pro or con? there are several basic arguments here that need

Re: /usr/bin or /sw/bin?

2002-11-18 Thread Martin Redington
On Monday, November 18, 2002, at 07:56 PM, drieux wrote: there are several basic arguments here that need to be addressed. martin has pointed towards a 'name space solution' by having your PATH environmental set to include the three basic sets /usr/local/bin:/sw/bin:/usr/bin I should add,

Re: /usr/bin or /sw/bin?

2002-11-18 Thread drieux
On Monday, Nov 18, 2002, at 12:22 US/Pacific, Martin Redington wrote: [..] I might not hate the stock perl enough to blow it away, but having it obscured by the PATH variable is exactly what I want. Of course, there is an issue with the instinctive #!/usr/bin/perl, with this approache, and

Re: hard links on HFS+ (now even further off topic...)

2002-11-18 Thread Ken Williams
On Monday, November 18, 2002, at 03:33 PM, Peter N Lewis wrote: For example, the system I want for mail is a mail server and pop server that run as the mail account and all mailboxes are private files, so there is no need for any special privs at all - except you need root access to open the

Re: hard links on HFS+ (now even further off topic...)

2002-11-18 Thread Ken Williams
On Monday, November 18, 2002, at 06:13 AM, Wiggins d'Anconia wrote: Heather Madrone wrote: Most of my career was spent as a C/C++ systems programmer. The damage I can do with a command line as root is nothing compared to the damage I can do with a C compiler. This makes no sense? Compiling

Re: hard links on HFS+ (now even further off topic...)

2002-11-18 Thread Wiggins d'Anconia
Ken Williams wrote: On Monday, November 18, 2002, at 06:13 AM, Wiggins d'Anconia wrote: Heather Madrone wrote: Most of my career was spent as a C/C++ systems programmer. The damage I can do with a command line as root is nothing compared to the damage I can do with a C compiler. This

Re: /usr/bin or /sw/bin?

2002-11-18 Thread Bohdan Peter Rekshynskyj
Yes, /usr/bin is traditional. If it's not a full-blow release, you might even consider /usr/bin/local Cheers, Bohdan On Monday, Nov 18, 2002, at 11:45 America/New_York, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 11:43 AM -0500 11/18/02, John Adams wrote: I've been happily using Fink to install some

Re: hard links on HFS+ (now even further off topic...)

2002-11-18 Thread Heather Madrone
At 11:29 AM 11/19/2002 +1100, Ken Williams wrote: On Monday, November 18, 2002, at 06:13 AM, Wiggins d'Anconia wrote: Heather Madrone wrote: Most of my career was spent as a C/C++ systems programmer. The damage I can do with a command line as root is nothing compared to the damage I can do with a

Re: hard links on HFS+

2002-11-18 Thread Chris Devers
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Joseph Kruskal wrote: On 11/1/02 3:47 AM, William H. Magill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... journaled file system ... What is a journaled file system? This has been answered already, but just to expand a bit: one very nice feature of the late lamented BeOS was it's

Re: locale in carbon emacs (was: OS X Installed numbers)

2002-11-18 Thread Chris Devers
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Heather Madrone wrote: At 12:46 PM 11/15/2002 +1100, Ken Williams wrote: On Friday, November 15, 2002, at 11:17 AM, Heather Madrone wrote: However, these past few days have been so discouraging that I have considered selling the Powerbook and surrendering to the evil of

Re: locale in carbon emacs (was: OS X Installed numbers)

2002-11-18 Thread Heather Madrone
At 12:49 AM 11/19/2002 -0500, Chris Devers wrote: Actually, I'm a bit curious how you managed to install Perl 5.8.0 without first installing the Tools. Maybe I missed some detail... I downloaded a binary. Those Apple switch ads currently make steam come out my ears. Kill Your Television.