On Sunday, April 14, 2002, at 06:21 , Bill -Sx- Jones wrote:
--boring, cautious, obvious over commented code--
Nothing wrong with being OVERLY cautious, especially if YOU expect to
understand why you did what you did months or years later.
I wrote a quick hack once to fix a short term
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 07:43 , Bill -Sx- Jones wrote:
On 4/15/02 10:34 AM, drieux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on a vt52 dial up with only sed as your editor
Yes - and THAT is why I only use a Mac :)
So I don't have use vt52 OR sed;
my complements to your good fortune!
But given
At 10:43 AM -0400 4/15/02, Bill -Sx- Jones wrote:
On 4/15/02 10:34 AM, drieux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on a vt52 dial up with only sed as your editor
Yes - and THAT is why I only use a Mac :)
So I don't have use vt52 OR sed;
Damn, your right. I just checked and terminal doesn't do
At 8:36 AM -0700 4/15/02, drieux wrote:
If anything the fact that they opted to go for the
plain jane vt100 mode is the 'warm fuzzy' - no need
to worry about esoteric and arcane 'termCap/termInfo'
settings for remote hosts
Actually the terminal setting lies. It is definitely not a vt100.
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 08:59 , Kee Hinckley wrote:
At 8:36 AM -0700 4/15/02, drieux wrote:
If anything the fact that they opted to go for the
plain jane vt100 mode is the 'warm fuzzy' - no need
to worry about esoteric and arcane 'termCap/termInfo'
settings for remote hosts
