Re: Application Support directory to classpath

2016-03-12 Thread Michael Hall
> Not sure what javapackager does. Perhaps this is helpful for you. javapackager is the current Oracle supported application builder. It automatically handles the signing related for sandboxed. The infinitekind app bundler fork might be worth a look as well though. Michael Hall

Re: Application Support directory to classpath

2016-03-12 Thread Hendrik Schreiber
Hey Michael, FWIW, I have been using https://bitbucket.org/infinitekind/appbundler as packager/launcher for a while now. It passes a couple of additional environment variables to the JVM: • LibraryDirectory • DocumentsDirectory • CachesDirectory • ApplicationSupp

Re: Application Support directory to classpath

2016-03-12 Thread Michael Hall
> On Mar 11, 2016, at 3:47 AM, Michael Hall wrote: > >> > > Maybe someone else can answer the question of whether or not this has been > considered for sandboxed java applications so that you actually do get > something different for these properties that is usable? Given no one has tried an

Re: Application Support directory to classpath

2016-03-11 Thread Michael Hall
> On Mar 11, 2016, at 1:23 AM, Hendrik Schreiber wrote: > > Hey Michael, > >> On Mar 11, 2016, at 02:51, Michael Hall wrote: >> >> I am trying to add some support for my application updating external files. >> Appstore is not necessarily a major concern, but I wouldn’t want to >> eliminate i

Re: Application Support directory to classpath

2016-03-10 Thread Hendrik Schreiber
Hey Michael, > On Mar 11, 2016, at 02:51, Michael Hall wrote: > > I am trying to add some support for my application updating external files. > Appstore is not necessarily a major concern, but I wouldn’t want to eliminate > it as a possibility for no good reason by doing something unnecessaril

Application Support directory to classpath

2016-03-10 Thread Michael Hall
I am trying to add some support for my application updating external files. Appstore is not necessarily a major concern, but I wouldn’t want to eliminate it as a possibility for no good reason by doing something unnecessarily violating some app store constraint. In some quick browsing I saw no r