Hello, Alexander.
The fix looks good to me.
With best regards. Petr.
On 18.02.2014, at 16:20, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> Hi, Alexander.
> The fix looks good then.
>
> On 17.02.2014 18:38, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
>> On 2/14/2014 3:16 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>> On 2/14/14 2:32 PM, Alexand
Hey guys,
will this fix cover JTree folder icons as well? I.e.
javax.swing.UIManager.getIcon("Tree.closedIcon") returns something that is
rendered in HiDPI on a a HiDPI display?
Or would that be a separate issue?
Thanks,
-hendrik
On Feb 24, 2014, at 14:48, Petr Pchelko wrote:
> Hello, Ale
> Just noticed this in Console.app when launching an application without an
> embedded JRE…
>
> 2/22/14 5:57:39.093 PM JavaAppLauncher[5669]: objc[5669]: Class
> JavaLaunchHelper is implemented in both /Library/Internet
> Plug-Ins/JavaAppletPlugin.plugin/Contents/Home/lib/jli/libjli.dylib and
On Feb 24, 2014, at 3:52 PM, David DeHaven wrote:
>
>> Just noticed this in Console.app when launching an application without an
>> embedded JRE…
>>
>> 2/22/14 5:57:39.093 PM JavaAppLauncher[5669]: objc[5669]: Class
>> JavaLaunchHelper is implemented in both /Library/Internet
>> Plug-Ins/Jav
> I think I asked this before. I'm not sure it was answered, not remembering
> the answer anyhow.
> Should java System.getenv pick up ones that are added with LSEnvironment in
> the Info.plist file?
> It doesn't seem to.
> What would be a workaround for java code that depends on things like a H
>>> Just noticed this in Console.app when launching an application without an
>>> embedded JRE…
>>>
>>> 2/22/14 5:57:39.093 PM JavaAppLauncher[5669]: objc[5669]: Class
>>> JavaLaunchHelper is implemented in both /Library/Internet
>>> Plug-Ins/JavaAppletPlugin.plugin/Contents/Home/lib/jli/libjl
On Feb 24, 2014, at 4:10 PM, David DeHaven wrote:
>
>> I think I asked this before. I'm not sure it was answered, not remembering
>> the answer anyhow.
>> Should java System.getenv pick up ones that are added with LSEnvironment in
>> the Info.plist file?
>> It doesn't seem to.
>> What would b
> Application. Signed, not sandboxed. Something recently, Lion -> Mountain Lion
> maybe? seemed not to work unless I signed it. So I self-signed. I first
> looked at this a while ago I think before it was even signed and still
> couldn't get it to work.
I don't know what the core issue is but
On Feb 24, 2014, at 5:15 PM, David DeHaven wrote:
>
>> Application. Signed, not sandboxed. Something recently, Lion -> Mountain
>> Lion maybe? seemed not to work unless I signed it. So I self-signed. I first
>> looked at this a while ago I think before it was even signed and still
>> couldn't
