At 6:21 PM + 2001-02-05, Alan Fry wrote:
>>At 4:25 pm +0100 2/2/01, Andreas Marcel Riechert wrote:
>>
>>| Waste >= 2.0 ... still Beta. ( http://www.merzwaren.com/waste/ )
>>| or
>>| The Multilingual Text Editor (MLTE)
>>
>>| Unfortunately MLTE seems to require MacOS 8.6 or
On 2001-02-05 at 14:10, John Delacour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't think of anything that can't be done with a very simple AppleScript
> script,
Yes, this is how I do it now but it would be nice.
> without even mentioning Frontier.
Personally I've never "become a buddy" (loses in tran
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Erik Moström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Personally, I don't have any need for a better text editor, I already have an
| excellent text editor. But what I would really like is a command shell ability.
| I would like to be able to enter the name of scripts and
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Fry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| I wish I had the ability to grab the WASTE libs and after a few
| grunts write "Hi MacPerlers -- here's a brand new editor". I couldn't
| do it on my own in a thousand years, but I would be happy (and
| interested) to have a
OK, since everybody else is giving their opinion I might as well give mine.
Personally, I don't have any need for a better text editor, I already have an
excellent text editor. But what I would really like is a command shell ability.
I would like to be able to enter the name of scripts and give c
Bart Lateur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If, however, the built-in editor got just that little bit better, people
>might find that they hardly ever need an external editor, at all.
My sentiments exactly - the external editors exist because they fill the
gap left by the MacPerl app's own editing fun
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001 07:52:35 -0600, David Steffen wrote:
>When I want to test
>a bit of syntax or knock out a small script, I usually use the
>MacPerl editor. When I am going to spend more than a few minutes on
>a script, I use BBEdit and then very much appreciate the integration.
>Why do I n
John Delacour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 4:25 pm +0100 2/2/01, Andreas Marcel Riechert wrote:
>
> | Even if we won't get a new text editor in the next release, it seems to
> | be a good idea to think about the features, the next editor should have.
> | I think -- because Perl is movin
