On Nov 27, 2007, at 3:40 AM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
I'ld like to add the maintainer to the Cc field of a ticket (#13399)
I've filed. How do I do that after having submitted the ticket ?
Unfortunately this is currently not possible if you're not a project
committer, we have a restricted
On Nov 28, 2007, at 3:07 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007, at 00:55, Rainer Müller wrote:
Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
From what I can see it should be possible to add custom fields to
the
trac system. How about adding these two fields:
+ portcategory
+ portname
as (mandatory) fields ?
On Nov 27, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Remove the Author: line. Instead, make the propchange email come
from the author, instead of the original committer. Also, put the
author's address in the Reply-To, not the committer's.
Also, we need to see what the old property value was, n
On Nov 28, 2007, at 00:55, Rainer Müller wrote:
Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
From what I can see it should be possible to add custom fields to
the
trac system. How about adding these two fields:
+ portcategory
+ portname
as (mandatory) fields ?
Not a good idea since you can also file bugs agai
Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
>>From what I can see it should be possible to add custom fields to the
> trac system. How about adding these two fields:
> + portcategory
> + portname
> as (mandatory) fields ?
Not a good idea since you can also file bugs against base code, docs or
the website.
Rainer
_
On Nov 27, 2007, at 12:06 AM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
Now that Trac mailing features are working for us, does it still
make sense to have this list, dev, as the default owner for the
base, ports & www components of tickets? As you may have already
seen, if we keep it like that we're
On Nov 27, 2007, at 11:37 AM, Ernest Prabhakar wrote:
Hi all,
On Nov 27, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Frank Rietta wrote:
MacPorts-1.6.0-Panther-10.3.dmg
MacPorts-1.6.0-Tiger-10.4.dmg
MacPorts-1.6.0-Leopard-10.5.dmg
I think that this proposed naming scheme provides the most clarity.
I like the idea,
This is a pretty straightforward new port for the Ruby json gem. I'm
willing to be the maintainer.
Can you someone take a look and commit?
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/13320
Thanks,
Roger
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-
Hi all,
On Nov 27, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Frank Rietta wrote:
MacPorts-1.6.0-Panther-10.3.dmg
MacPorts-1.6.0-Tiger-10.4.dmg
MacPorts-1.6.0-Leopard-10.5.dmg
I think that this proposed naming scheme provides the most clarity.
I like the idea, but I would suggest:
MacPorts-1.6.0-10.3-Panther.dmg
M
On Nov 26, 2007, at 12:56 PM, Simon Ruderich wrote:
I like the idea, but maybe we should add the version after the
name. I can
sometimes not remember which name stands for which version.
MacPorts-1.6.0-Panther-10.3.dmg
MacPorts-1.6.0-Tiger-10.4.dmg
MacPorts-1.6.0-Leopard-10.5.dmg
I think tha
On Nov 26, 2007, at 11:56, Simon Ruderich wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 12:25:17PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
[snip]
Maybe we could use the kitty name starting with our next release?
MacPorts-1.6.0-Panther.dmg
MacPorts-1.6.0-Tiger.dmg
MacPorts-1.6.0-Leopard.dmg
That would make it easier to
Ok, so propchange emails are working! Great! Some suggestions though:
On Nov 27, 2007, at 06:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: November 27, 2007 06:53:55 CST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: propchange - r31472 svn:log
Reply-To: macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org, [EMAIL P
I have the same problem on that.
It's very inconvenient.
On Nov 27, 2007 4:40 PM, Bjarne D Mathiesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'ld like to add the maintainer to the Cc field of a ticket (#13399)
> I've filed. How do I do that after having submitted the ticket ?
>
> --
> Bjarne D Mathiesen
> Kø
On Nov 26, 2007, at 11:36 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007, at 22:06, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
Now that Trac mailing features are working for us, does it still
make sense to have this list, dev, as the default owner for the
base, ports & www components of tickets? As you may ha
Boey Maun Suang wrote:
Hi everyone,
Probably a stupid question, but:
LDFLAGS = -L/usr/local/lib @LDFLAGS@
Should we really have '-L/usr/local/lib' in that line in
trunk/base/Mk/macports.autoconf.mk.in ?
Having it there (explicitly) makes things more predictable,
as it'll look in /usr/lo
On Nov 26, 2007, at 23:10, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007, at 12:36 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007, at 22:06, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
Now that Trac mailing features are working for us, does it still
make sense to have this list, dev, as the default owner for the
16 matches
Mail list logo
