GSoC 2011: Call for Mentors

Hello, I am going to submit an application on behalf of The MacPorts Project for the Google Summer of Code (GSoC) program 2011. I think most of you will already have heard of it. Google pays students to work on various Open Source projects over the summer. It is also a good start for students with

Re: perl5, perl5.* changes

On 2011-03-01 16:45 , Dan Ports wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:34:22PM -0800, Dan Ports wrote: >> I see this as a high-priority issue that affects many people. So if we >> can get things closer to working by revbumping a bunch of ports, we >> should do that ASAP. Is there any reason *not* to r

Re: KDE's application path

On 2011-02-16 22:52 , Nicolas Pavillon wrote: > There are ways to circumvent this issue, but can hardly be automated > on the Portfile. Typically, a solution may be to prepare a preference > file with proper path already set in, but KDE's preferences are in > ~/Library/Preferences/KDE, so that inst

Re: [76421] trunk/doc-new/guide/xml/installing.xml

On 2011-02-23 22:05 , Andrea D'Amore wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Ryan Schmidt > wrote: > >> Of course, MP_EDITOR won't work for most users until we release a new >> version of MacPorts base including that change. > > Should documentation refer to a packaged release instead? We

Re: gtk3 in category gnome

On 2011-02-18 18:32 , David Baumgold wrote: > I agree that gtk2 and gtk3 should be in the same category, but I figured > that "gnome" was more applicable than "x11", considering that GTK is the > Gnome ToolKit. I'm in favor of moving gtk2 to the gnome category: does > anyone have any objections? A

gtk3 in category gnome

Hi David, you added a pre-release version of gtk3 a few weeks ago. I was looking into updating it to the final GTK+ 3.0.0. I noticed the new port lives in category gnome while gtk2 is in x11. Was this intentional? In my opinion we should move both into the same category. Rainer _

Re: [75992] trunk/dports/aqua

On 2011-02-16 18:39 , Daniel J. Luke wrote: > On Feb 16, 2011, at 12:38 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> I would dislike removing vcs fetching because it is very convenient to use. >> It can be used correctly -- specifying a version to fetch -- maintainers >> just need to know that they need to do t

Re: MacPorts participation in GSoC 2011

Thank you for all suggestions! I will incorporate these into the ideas page in the next days. On 2011-02-16 10:25 , Joshua Root wrote: > * When an action will run targets on multiple ports, run them in > parallel when possible and sensible (requires tracking dependencies > between both targets and

MacPorts participation in GSoC 2011

Hello, Google has once again announced their Google Summer of Code for 2011. They will begin to accept mentoring organizations as of February 28 until March 11. In GSoC students get money to work for an open source project over the summer. MacPorts participated in the years from 2007 to 2010 with

Re: port my own applications

Hello, On 2011-02-15 09:03 , Panayotis Katsaloulis wrote: > I am the author of the Jubler subtitle program and a happy user of > macports. I would like to ask if you think it is acceptable to create > a port of my application. Although I have already a DMG version and > an auto-update mechanism, I

Scheduled downtime on Feb 2, 15-16 UTC

Hello, there will be a scheduled downtime for the MacPorts mailing list server due to maintenante at our hosting provider MacOSforge. The services will be affected on February 2nd from 15:00 to 16:00 UTC. See the original MacOSforge announcement attached below. Rainer Original Message

Re: how to extend 'clean' operation

On 2011-02-01 00:19 , James Gregurich wrote: > does workdir == $workpath? Uhm, yes, that is what I meant actually. Sorry for the confusion. I should have known better as in MacPorts anything ending with *path is an absolute path, while *dir means a relative directory name. > If so, then that is

Re: how to extend 'clean' operation

Hello James, On 2011-02-01 00:08 , James Gregurich wrote: > I'm looking for documentation or an example on how to add custom code > to a clean operation in a portfile and I'm not finding anything > useful. Can I get some guidance on the proper way to extend a 'clean' > in a port file? What exact

Re: [75406] trunk/dports/devel

On 2011-01-24 17:27 , ye...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 75406 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/75406 > Author: ye...@macports.org > Date: 2011-01-24 08:27:40 -0800 (Mon, 24 Jan 2011) > Log Message: > --- > import libevent2 > > Added Paths: > --- > trunk/

Re: libpng transition?

On 2011-01-22 01:21 , Jack Howarth wrote: > Your argument doesn't make sense. According to... > > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/74954 > > the revision 1 change was committed on Jan 9th, whereas according to... > > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/75159 > > The bump to revision 2 was do

Re: libpng transition?

On 2011-01-21 21:41 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > Why are the effects of -R not the default behavior? -R causes a forced rebuild of *all* dependents recursively and will cause lots of unnecessary builds. There is currently no way to tell if an upgrade of a dependent is required. Note also, a 'por

Re: [75235] trunk/doc-new/guide/xml/portfile-phase.xml

On 2011-01-21 18:44 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > Is this available on the site somewhere, or will each person trying to make > changes be left guessing how to do it properly? All you need to do is 'make guide' in the doc-new directory. There is also a README. The Makefile expects the MacPorts inst

Re: libpng transition?

On 2011-01-21 15:02 , Jack Howarth wrote: >When I did a 'sudo port selfupdate' and 'sudo port outdated", the libpng > and other packages > were updated but the pymol wasn't. I am still unclear on how this mechanism > can be certain to > sequence properly. Since MacPorts lacks the ability to d

Scheduled downtime on Jan 19, 15-16 UTC

Hello, there will be a scheduled downtime for the MacPorts Trac and the Subversion repository due to a hardware upgrade at our hosting provider MacOSforge. The services will be affected on January 19th from 15:00 to 16:00 UTC. See the original MacOSforge announcement attached below. Rainer

Re: [75134] trunk/dports/net/mtr/Portfile

On 2011-01-16 12:10 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Perhaps we could change the "port -d checksum" output to no longer suggest > the md5 > checksums. That's already the case for an empty or missing checksums line. It will only print out sha1 and rmd160. But if a checksums line already exists, checksum w

Re: [75039] trunk/dports/kde/kdelibs4/Portfile

On 2011-01-13 21:28 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: >> If you're going to do that, then you need to bump the revision too, to force >> a rebuild for everyone who already installed kdelibs4 without kerberos5 >> support. > > I'd rather avoid that, rebuilding kdelibs to change functionality would have >

Re: archive_sites in Portfiles

On 2011-01-07 04:39 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: >> I thought we decided before that we don't want individual >> maintainers distributing archives, but that we want a central >> server farm creating and distributing them? I concur with Ryan, having a central build infrastructure will be better. MPAB i

Re: Problem with distfile, how to proceed?

On 2011-01-05 03:06 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > The problem here was I think that you were using a > BitBucket-generated distfile, and they did not keep the distfile > around anywhere; they re-generated it later, after you had already > recorded its checksums into the portfile. I recall there was at le

Re: Option for a "local mirror"?

On 2011-01-02 02:11 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > This is the layout my existing local mirror already uses, and I don't > really want to have all ports' distfiles in a single directory. Is > there any way, using MASTER_SITE_LOCAL, that I can run a local mirror > using the same directory layout as our pub

Re: [74720] trunk/dports/x11/gobby/Portfile

On 2010-12-30 18:41 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: >> x11/gobby: Add missing dependency, fixes #27811x11/gobby: Add missing >> dependency, fixes #27811x11/gobby: Add missing dependency, fixes >> #27811x11/gobby: Add missing dependency, fixes #27811x11/gobby: Add missing >> dependency, fixes #27811x11/

Re: Performance issue?!

I don't have a good explanation, but there are some aspects in virtualization which are serious issues for taking benchmarks inside the VM. Some operations may take longer or even shorter on a VM than on real hardware. As an example, in a VM the I/O operations can happen directly in RAM as the hos

Re: Tickets #26325 and #27283

On 2010-12-11 17:22 , Francois Claire wrote: > The new ports in tickets #26325 and #27283 should be ready now. I committed both new ports. Sorry that it always takes that long to process your port submissions... Rainer ___ macports-dev mailing list macp

Re: Arch of .mo Files

On 2010-12-03 13:34 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Dec 2, 2010, at 23:01, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > >> I have a package that is on the path of being noarch, but `file` claims that >> the produced .mo files are a specific endian. Are .mo files >> architecture-specific? > > .mo files are machine-sp

Re: Kismet and Tiger

On 2010-11-29 02:49 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > Perhaps this leads us to another issue: why is the MacPorts site a mountain > of text? Even our downloads must be found mid-sentence. Most of the website content was written by jmpp and he loves text ;-) I totally agree with you that the download li

Re: Howto Section

On 2010-11-13 15:39 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > Do we still need the "how to build 64-bit binaries?" how to? This was just an idea, *shrug* I added some topics as we introduced this section to encourage others to write more HOWTO documents. But seems like that didn't work out that way... ;-) Rain

Re: compile additional files after build

On 2010-11-11 02:32 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > After build I need to: > > cd ${worksrcpat}/driver > /usr/bin/gcc blah blah > > I'm currently doing: > > post-build { >system "cd ${worksrcpath}/driver" >system "CC=/usr/bin/gcc \$CC -bundle " > } You should be using ${configure.cc}

Re: A few new features for `port`

On 2010-11-08 15:26 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: >> When you want to see which ports you _could_ remove, that aren't >> depended on by anything else. >> There are times when you may have installed a port as a trial and no >> longer need it to be installed. >> In this case, it may simply be better to in

Re: A few new features for `port`

On 2010-11-08 08:59 , Anders F Björklund wrote: > Galen Wright-Watson wrote: > >> I've a few customizations for the `port` command, and I'm getting tired of >> patching with each new release, so I'm offering them up for inclusion into >> the base, should others be interested. The attached "port.

Re: Email Addresses in Man Pages

On 2010-11-02 01:13 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > But I'm not sure it's the best strategy to try to keep that list > updated with new people. I don't know whom to properly consider > "authors" of MacPorts. Can we just delete that section, or refer > people to the MacPortsDevelopers wiki page? This secti

Re: How to convert the Guide's xml source files into (chunked) HTML locally?

On 2010-10-30 20:13 , Marko Käning wrote: > I figure there should be an XSLT stylesheet somewhere and a certain > xlstproc call to make this task work… But before I start searching > and experimenting I hope that someone can give me quick help on the > list. There is a Makefile for this task at th

Re: xorg-util-macros w/o any dependencies...

On 2010-10-30 19:33 , Marko Käning wrote: > Is it correct that xorg-util-macros has no dependencies and is not required > by another port? > Well, at least I have it for some reason installed on my system, although no > port requires it. Perhaps I have the latter uninstalled at some stage, so >

Re: Port groups howto

On 2010-10-29 20:43 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > I suspect it's deeper, like the locking mechanism in MacPorts: you can do > multiple non-install commands, but the moment you use an install command all > others get locked out--even while it's doing fetch for its dependencies. Note that this behavi

Re: Port groups howto

On 2010-10-29 20:32 , Marko Käning wrote: > On Oct 29, 2010, at 8:21 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > >> >> ${prefix}/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/ports/_resources/port1.0/group/ > > Would be an idea to update the Guide accordingly. :) The source files for the guide are at trunk/d

Re: xmlto dependencies on texlive

On 2010-10-27 03:58 , Dan Ports wrote: > Can move xmlto's dblatex/texlive dependencies into a variant, or better > yet a separate port? As these are runtime dependencies, I assume we could remove them from xmlto and add them on individual ports who need that as build dependencies. Of course that

Re: Progress UI for Phases

On 2010-10-26 19:52 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > Have there been any plans to make use of a `curl -# ...` style > progress bar for the download/configure/install phases? This is for > the normal, non-verbose/non-debug output. If I remember correctly such a style is not available from libcurl, but wo

Re: suggest portgroup selector

On 2010-10-26 18:55 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > Would be nice to be able to: > > port echo portgroup:kde4 > > > Also adding portgroup to output of "port info". The PortGroup statements is currently just a blessed include. The information is not stored anywhere, also not in the index. This wou

Re: avoiding "Portfile changed since last build; discarding previous state."

On 2010-10-25 20:36 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > Is Google able to search our man pages (are they online)? No, they are not. More than a year ago I started the new-help-system branch, which is intended to rewrite our man pages in asciidoc. This would make it possible to generate HTML pages as well a

Re: SHA256 checksums

Hello Anders, On 2010-10-25 10:31 , Anders F Björklund wrote: > I think the main objection to sha256 checksums was > that they were "too long", even though one sha256 > is shorter than two as in both of sha1 and rmd160... > > But one way to make it "shorter" is to use base32 > rather than base16

Re: Permissions for trac's wiki pages

On 2010-10-23 11:56 , Marko Käning wrote: > I just noticed that it is possible for any registered user to create own wiki > pages on MacPorts' trac. > > I found it strange though that it was not possible to delete a previously > created page anymore. > > This, I understood, is only allowed to c

Re: [MacPorts] mk modified

On 2010-10-24 15:55 , MacPorts wrote: > Changed page "mk" by m...@macports.org from 93.233.120.127* > Page URL: > Diff URL: > Revision 25 > Comment: Hmm, tilde not allowed in URLs, disable them for now U

Re: [72651] trunk/dports

Changes like this should not be necessary anymore with 1.9. If you try to install +universal and a dependency does not have a universal variant, it will print a descriptive error message: $ sudo port install foo +universal Error: Cannot install foo for the arch(s) 'i386 x86_64' because Error

Re: [72523] trunk/dports/net

On 2010-10-19 22:51 , Anders F Björklund wrote: > Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >>> And you still want to use both sha1/rmd160 rather >>> than just sha256, right ? (In addition to the md5.) >> >> As I update ports I have been using sha1 and rmd160 only. I've been >> removing md5 on the theory that it is

Re: [72457] trunk/dports/devel/ld64/Portfile

On 2010-10-16 19:10 , Mike Alexander wrote: > There's another problem with this. Since this executes > "${prefix}/bin/llvm-config" every time the port file is parsed it fails > if whatever provides that (maybe llvm?) is not installed. This means > that portindex fails with this patch if you do

Re: [72457] trunk/dports/devel/ld64/Portfile

On 2010-10-16 14:50 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Oct 16, 2010, at 04:53, mfe...@macports.org wrote: > >> Revision: 72457 >> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/72457 >> Author: mfe...@macports.org >> Date: 2010-10-16 02:52:57 -0700 (Sat, 16 Oct 2010) >> Log Message: >> --- >> m

Re: [72439] trunk/dports/devel/ld64

Hello Michael, portindex fails on ld64 when llvm is not installed. You are trying to execute a binary which is not present. Failed to parse file devel/ld64/Portfile: couldn't execute "/opt/local/bin/llvm-config": no such file or directory I would recommend to move the exec inside a pre-configure

Re: macportstrac.sh

On 2010-10-14 19:40 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > I was interested in a simple and quick way to see if a port has any > tickets in trac. I wrote a simple shell script as a starting point. > Maybe there is already a command line svn-trac integration tool? I > think this might be a nice feature

Supported python versions (was: Re: [72383] trunk/dports/devel/gtk-osx-application/Portfile)

On 2010-10-13 22:06 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: >>> Are we ready to make the jump from python26 to python27 for all of macports? >> > >> I suppose not, but it looked good (pygtk, and many others where already >> there). >> Maybe it's too early to make it default, would you advise to revert it ? > >

Xcode shared pre-compiled headers cache

Hello, in ticket #26723 [1] I had to deal with a Xcode related problem. Apparently the pre-compiled headers of an older build have been re-used although the file contents has changed on disk. In the Mac OS X Reference Library [2], I found some documentation about this feature. "Xcode automatical

Re: [72401] trunk/dports/lang/perl5/Portfile

On 2010-10-13 15:01 , rai...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 72401 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/72401 > Author: rai...@macports.org > Date: 2010-10-13 06:01:02 -0700 (Wed, 13 Oct 2010) > Log Message: > --- > lang/perl5: > perl5.12 provides version 5.12.2, creating th

Re: Using fetch.type git AND standard.....

On 2010-10-09 19:37 , Steve Fatula wrote: > So, I have a situation where I need to get the main program via git, and, > another program via normal methods and I cannot figure the syntax for the > life of me. > > fetch.type standard:typea \ >git:typeb > > Would likely be the correct synt

Re: How to close a ticket?

On 2010-10-09 09:06 , Marko Käning wrote: > Wondering whether this is connected with my Email address used for > trac login which is not "m...@macports.org" (used for committing to > svn), but "mk-macpo...@techno.ms" (used for mailing list and trac > login). You should use a Trac account with your

Re: [72200] trunk/dports/lang/llvm/Portfile

On 2010-10-06 20:54 , eri...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 72200 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/72200 > Author: eri...@macports.org > Date: 2010-10-06 11:54:51 -0700 (Wed, 06 Oct 2010) > Log Message: > --- > llvm with clang version default > > Modified Paths: >

Re: [MacPorts] #26710: Update gdk-pixbuf to latest release

On 2010-10-03 20:16 , David Evans wrote: > Actually the latest version of gtk+ 2.22.0 breaks gdk-pixbuf out > separately again (also 2.22.0) to keep > it out of the gtk3 development path. So a gdk-pixbuf-2 port will be > necessary when gtk2 is upgraded (and some > logic to disable the old gtk2 bef

Re: [72075] trunk/dports

On 10/02/2010 06:37 PM, eri...@macports.org wrote: > Added: trunk/dports/python/py26-pyzmq/Portfile > === > --- trunk/dports/python/py26-pyzmq/Portfile (rev 0) > +++ trunk/dports/python/py26-pyzmq/Portfile 2

Re: python portfile issue with running setup.py twice

On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:53:46 -0600, Frank Schima wrote: > I'm still not clear how this will run both setup.py commands that are > needed. The build phase in the port group runs "setup.py ... build", after that destroot phase runs "setup.py ... install". That's exactly what you wanted to do, just

Re: [71873] trunk/dports/math/petsc/Portfile

On 2010-09-26 16:56 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Oops, but now you've got a post-destroot inside a post-destroot. I wonder, > does that work? Maybe it does. :P It does work, but that's merely a coincidence. For example it wouldn't work to add a pre-destroot inside a post-destroot... I would advice to

Re: port -q -v differs from port -v -q

On 2010-09-24 23:00 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > It makes sense to me that "quiet" would hide some info that's > normally shown, and "verbose" would show some info that's normally > hidden. As you said, I want to hide the usually-shown header, and > show the usually-hidden architectures and platforms. I

Re: port -q -v differs from port -v -q

On 2010-09-24 22:24 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > I just noticed that "port -q -v" is not the same as "port -v -q": > > > $ port -v -q installed zlib > zlib @1.2.5_0+universal (active) > $ port -q -v installed zlib > zlib @1.2.5_0+universal (active) platform='darwin 10' archs='i386 x86_64' > > >

Re: [71761] trunk/dports/sysutils/dpkg

On 2010-09-22 22:41 , Joshua Root wrote: > On 2010-9-23 06:15 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> Weren't we supposed to be depending on perl as "path:bin/perl:perl5"? > > That makes no sense given that perl5 doesn't provide bin/perl... perl5 always depends on one of perl5.8, perl5.10 or perl5.12 depending

Re: port load/unload

On 2010-09-18 22:23 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> if {${build.asroot} == "yes"} { >> ui_msg (no newline) "sudo " >> } >> ui_msg "port load ${name}" No, build.asroot does not have anything to do whether we are using Leopard or Snow Leopard, so that's not the solution. Also note that you don't need sudo

Re: port load/unload

On 2010-09-18 21:15 , Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > Do we "do the right thing" by not having them use 'sudo' for LaunchAgents on > Snow Leopard? MacPorts does not make any difference between LaunchDaemons and LaunchAgents. The default for startupitem.location is LaunchDaemons and I am not aware of a

Re: build.env-append working with merger in muniversal?

On 2010-09-14 19:57 , Michael Dickens wrote: > That said, I haven't figured out how to execute Python as 32-bit to > test whether or not that variety works [...] Try to execute the 32-bit code in the universal binary with the Apple provided /usr/bin/arch: arch -i386 /opt/local/bin/python2.6 HTH,

Re: Using MacPorts to build from source directory

On 2010-09-13 16:59 , Oliver King-Smith wrote: > It would be convenient to run MacPorts in such a fashion where it can > just use a local directory for the source files as opposed to grabbing a > tar ball from an http or ftp server. This would allow me to make > changes to source code and then re

Re: trouble building new libpano portfile

On 2010-09-11 22:05 , Harry van der Wolf wrote: > I tried: > > if {[variant_isset universal]} { > configure.ldflags-append ${configure.universal_ldflags} > } else { > configure.ldflags-append ${configure.ld_archflags} > } > > That doesn't work. Do I use it incorrect

Re: trouble building new libpano portfile

On 2010-09-11 17:18 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > Replace curly braces with double quotes for reinplace regex. > > post-configure { > if {[variant_isset universal]} { > foreach arch ${universal_archs} { >reinplace -E "s|-dynamiclib|-dynamiclib -arch ${arch}|" $ > {works

Re: [71380] trunk/base/src/pextlib1.0/system.c

On 2010-09-11 01:00 , rai...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 71380 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/71380 > Author: rai...@macports.org > Date: 2010-09-10 16:00:39 -0700 (Fri, 10 Sep 2010) > Log Message: > --- > pextlib1.0: > Add new 'system -W path' which changes into t

Problems with option-replace modifier

>From > I caused this by switching ImageMagick to use the new `-replace` syntax in > r70377. [...] [The] problem is that when I asked it to replace "`--with-x`" > with > "`--without-x`" in the `configure.args`, in fact it replaced "`--with- > x

Re: trying to avoid a double negative in port variant

On 2010-09-10 12:03 , Kjell Konis wrote: > What I am having trouble figuring out is how to turn off the variant. When I > run (Portfile is in the cwd) > > bash-3.2# port install -recommended The syntax is port install -- -recommended or port install current -recommended The command line

Re: [71338] trunk/dports/graphics/vtk5/Portfile

On 2010-09-09 17:30 , raph...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 71338 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/71338 > Author: raph...@macports.org > Date: 2010-09-09 08:30:18 -0700 (Thu, 09 Sep 2010) > Log Message: > --- > vtk5: > > * collect post-destroot phases of all variants

Re: [71115] trunk/dports/science/gnuradio-grc/Portfile

On 2010-09-04 17:00 , Michael Dickens wrote: > On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:18 +0200, "Rainer Müller" > wrote: >> >> You should use the replaced_by option with a revision bump >> which will automatically remove the old port and install >> the new one on upgrad

Re: call script from Portfile?

On 2010-09-07 23:27 , Titus von Boxberg wrote: > Am 07.09.2010 um 21:43 schrieb Bradley Giesbrecht: >> In which ever phase you want to work you can add some "if [variant_isset >> myvariant]" logic. >> >> man portfile >> /variant > Found it. The variable holding all selected variants of the port is

Re: Tickets #26139, #26198

On 2010-09-06 16:08 , Titus von Boxberg wrote: > Would a commiter please commit the diffs from these tickets? Committed #26198 in r71265. Committed #26139 in r71266. > And - if not too new - also from #26377 Committed #26377 in r71267. Rainer ___ macp

Re: [71235] trunk/base/src/pextlib1.0/curl.c

On 2010-09-05 23:25 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Have you also put in any rate-limiting checks? I've run into problems > lately with the mirror for gcc46 delivering part of a file to me, > then stalling, and MacPorts sitting forever waiting for data and not > giving up and trying another mirror as I wou

Re: [71114] trunk/dports/science

On 2010-09-01 20:54 , michae...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 71114 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/71114 > Author: michae...@macports.org > Date: 2010-09-01 11:54:21 -0700 (Wed, 01 Sep 2010) > Log Message: > --- > Update GNU Radio and USRP to version 3.3.0. > Added n

Re: [71115] trunk/dports/science/gnuradio-grc/Portfile

On 2010-09-01 21:10 , michae...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 71115 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/71115 > Author: michae...@macports.org > Date: 2010-09-01 12:10:52 -0700 (Wed, 01 Sep 2010) > Log Message: > --- > Add NOTE about the renaming of this port. You should

Re: Qt4 Poll

On 2010-08-31 16:53 , Frank Schima wrote: > I use Qt4 and PyQt4 every day. Ultimately I just care if PyQt4 works. > However, the Mac way is to use Frameworks and python26 and above use > it. I don't see how py26-pyqt4 will work without a framework build of > Qt4, but I don't actually know either wa

Re: Possibility of hdparm on Mac OS X

On 2010-08-27 07:42 , Scott Webster wrote: > I guess maybe the name isn't really indicative of what MacPorts really > does... because I don't think it is porting :) Right, at the moment we are only packaging software to be easily installed... Q: Yeah, why are we not porting software to Mac OS X?

Re: please commit

On 2010-08-23 18:43 , Daniel wrote: > http://trac.macports.org/ticket/25996 Committed in r70852. > http://trac.macports.org/ticket/26145 Committed in r70853. Rainer ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforg

Re: [70816] trunk/dports/gnome/gst-plugins-base/Portfile

On 2010-08-23 01:13 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Now that MacPorts 1.9.0 is out, we should no longer prefer "no_" > variants, so instead this should be an "ogg" variant which is on by > default ("default_variants +ogg"). We do not enforce use of the sqlite registry yet which is vital for deselected var

Re: [70418] branches/gsoc10-configfiles/base/src/cregistry/entry.c

On 2010-08-08 22:46 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Is there a reason why you're using md5 and not sha1 or rmd160, or a > combination of multiple algorithms like we do for portfile checksums? > My understanding was that md5 is old and now considered insecure and > should not be used for new code anymore.

Re: 1.9.2

On 2010-08-05 16:25 , Joshua Root wrote: > On 2010-8-5 23:24 , Rainer Müller wrote: >> The problem with activate/deactivate was introduced by the fact that >> activation/deactivation is now being run from the registry Portfile >> making the statefile lock ineffective for ano

Re: 1.9.2

On 2010-08-05 11:45 , Joshua Root wrote: > On 2010-8-5 19:05 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> On Aug 4, 2010, at 03:14, Joshua Root wrote: >> >>> Does anyone have any more patches that should go into the 1.9.2 >>> release? >> >> The change you made to fix 19935 seems to be drastic. >> >> http://trac

Re: ruby_select port

On 2010-08-02 18:46 , David Baumgold wrote: > I'm fine with all of that. Kimura, do you want to be the maintainer of the > ruby_select port? Ryan, can you instruct us on the proper way to write a > select port, now that the select functionality is built into Macports? Just do the same as python_se

Re: [70235] trunk/dports/multimedia/libvpx

Michael, thanks for implementing the fix for this problem. On 2010-08-03 06:49 , michae...@macports.org wrote: > +# set configure parameters depending on if universal or not > +if {![variant_isset universal]} { > +# specify only the single target, otherwise 'configure' will try > +# for a

New committer: mfeiri

Please join us in welcoming the following new MacPorts committers: - Michael Feiri (mfeiri) We look forward to continued excellent contributions from these new team members. - Bryan, Joshua, Rainer, and Ryan Do you want to join the MacPorts team? If you would like to be considered for team me

Re: variants not preserved on upgrade

On 2010-08-02 07:48 , Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > From the Portfile: > > foreach s ${pythons_suffixes} { > set p python${s} > set v [string index ${s} 0].[string index ${s} 1] > set i [lsearch -exact ${pythons_ports} ${p}] > set c [lreplace ${pythons_ports} ${i} ${i}] > eval

Re: variants not preserved on upgrade

On 2010-08-01 00:07 , Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > I have boost installed as +python26+universal: > $ port installed boost > The following ports are currently installed: > boost @1.42.0_0+icu+python26+universal (active) > > but when upgrading, it's trying to pull in openmpi (which is a variant tha

Changing port maintainership rules (was: Re: [70103] trunk/dports/lang/parrot/Portfile)

On 07/30/2010 12:24 PM, Thomas Keller wrote: > Am 30.07.10 07:53, schrieb Rainer Müller: >> As the ticket was sitting 6 months without attention should we call port >> abandonement for parrot? > > I'd vote for a less bureaucratic way to handle all this, i.e. l

Re: [70103] trunk/dports/lang/parrot/Portfile

On 2010-07-30 03:55 , Thomas Keller wrote: > Am 30.07.10 03:47, schrieb Ryan Schmidt: >> Were your changes approved by the port's maintainers, by the way? > > Actually not, but as the port was largely outdated I did this (and the > earlier) NMU without the create-ticket-wait-72-hours-finally-conti

Re: Installer should allow installation of macport in custom locations - for users without admin access

On 2010-07-29 11:57 , Mark Farnell wrote: > Are there any way to make ports relocable? > > In OS X, applications are placed in Foo.app I see a lot of applications in /usr/bin. > whereas shared libraries (Framework) and data are placed under /Library There are many libraries in /usr/lib and lots

Re: [MacPorts] InstallingMacPorts modified

On 2010-07-28 20:40 , vincent habchi wrote: > Le 28 juil. 2010 à 18:45, Ryan Schmidt > a écrit : > >> >> Xcode updates via Software Update on Snow Leopard? That would be >> handy. I hadn't seen that yet. > > Not in any way I am aware of. According to this post [1

Re: Update Clojure port

On 2010-07-08 16:47 , Michael Dippery wrote: > Can someone commit the latest patch to the Clojure port? [1] It's > been four months since it was submitted but it hasn't been committed > yet apparently. Committed in r69628. Rainer ___ macports-dev mailin

Re: please commit pidgin port

On 2010-07-05 19:17 , Daniel wrote: > Would someone committ http://trac.macports.org/ticket/25127 please? Committed in r69627. > It feels odd to have to request commits every time I want a port > committed. Surely there must be some more efficient way of doing this? Sorry, but that's we way we d

Re: [MacPorts] #25507: kdelibs4 4.4.x fails to compile/link: undefined symbols "_png_set_longjmp_fn"

On 07/10/2010 03:52 PM, Joshua Root wrote: > Seems kind of overengineered to me. The few ports that have a known safe > build.jobs limit > 1 can just do: > > if {${build.jobs} > $safe_limit} { > build.jobs $safe_limit > } In this case we should also get rid of "use_parallel_build no" and re

Re: [MacPorts] #25507: kdelibs4 4.4.x fails to compile/link: undefined symbols "_png_set_longjmp_fn"

On 2010-07-10 00:38 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > I once suggested it would be a good idea to replace the > "use_parallel_build" yes/no switch with a more fine-grained switch > (say "parallel_jobs") where you could specify the maximum number of > parallel jobs. "parallel_jobs 1" would then be the equival

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >