Re: [144262] trunk/dports/lang/py-htmldocs/Portfile

I was thinking you might use git+https://github.com/python/cpython.git/Doc with a set checkout id using the GitHub PortGroup, but that would require building the docs. How about using https://docs.python.org and relying on python.org's SSL cert to ensure the integrity rather than the MacPorts

Re: [144262] trunk/dports/lang/py-htmldocs/Portfile

The general solution to this problem is to create a stable (snapshot) mirror somewhere else. > On Jan 6, 2016, at 5:44 AM, Russell Jones > wrote: > I was thinking you might use git+https://github.com/python/cpython.git/Doc > with a set checkout id using the

KDE4/KF5 "cohabitation"

Hello Nicolas, I'm sure you've noticed that I'm making progress with ports for KF5. Maybe I should have asked your opinion on how to approach this (if so, apologies that I didn't), but I would like to know your thoughts on the issue of co-existence of KDE4 and KF5 ports. KF5 is designed to

Re: [144262] trunk/dports/lang/py-htmldocs/Portfile

On Jan 6, 2016, at 4:44 AM, Russell Jones wrote: > I was thinking you might use git+https://github.com/python/cpython.git/Doc > with a set checkout id using the GitHub PortGroup, but that would require > building the docs. > > How about using https://docs.python.org and relying on

Re: pymol-devel obsolete?

On Jan 5, 2016, at 5:19 PM, David Strubbe wrote: > I propose to make the port pymol-devel obsolete. There is a pymol port, which > is a newer version of the same software. It is not clear what, if any, > purpose pymol-devel serves, though years ago it was a newer version than the > pymol port

Re: [144262] trunk/dports/lang/py-htmldocs/Portfile

On Jan 6, 2016, at 6:44 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > An SSL certificate does not guarantee the user is getting the same files the > maintainer did. It only guarantees the user is talking to the same server. it's not even that strong of a guarantee (especially since the

Re: uploading distfiles directly to the distfiles mirror

On Jan 6, 2016, at 7:51 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > On Jan 6, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> How would you envision this capability being provided? I wouldn't want to, >> for example, just open up ftp write access to the distfiles server to anyone >> who

Re: uploading distfiles directly to the distfiles mirror (was: Re: [144262] trunk/dports/lang/py-htmldocs/Portfile)

On Jan 6, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > How would you envision this capability being provided? I wouldn't want to, > for example, just open up ftp write access to the distfiles server to anyone > who asked for it. maybe for maintainers (or committers only)?

Re: uploading distfiles directly to the distfiles mirror (was: Re: [144262] trunk/dports/lang/py-htmldocs/Portfile)

On Jan 6, 2016, at 7:29 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > > Can we make it easier for maintainers to add files to the mirrors? When we > used to put files into subversion, it was easy for any maintainer to avoid > this problem by just checking in a snapshot. While it's undesirable to go > back to

Re: [144322] trunk/dports/python/py-keyczar/Portfile

> On Jan 6, 2016, at 10:12 AM, adfernan...@macports.org wrote: > > Revision > 144322 > Author > adfernan...@macports.org > Date > 2016-01-06 08:12:47 -0800 (Wed, 06 Jan 2016) > Log Message > > python/py-keyczar: fix portfile for silent failures that only buildbot showed > (grr) > Modified

Re: [KDE/Mac] KDE4/KF5 "cohabitation"

Hi René and Nicolas and everybody, On 07/01/2016, at 1:44 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > I'm sure you've noticed that I'm making progress with ports for KF5. Yep. Good on yer, René! And it is nice to see that David Faure and other KDE core developers are taking an interest at last... > KF5 is

Re: uploading distfiles directly to the distfiles mirror

On Jan 6, 2016, at 8:53 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Jan 6, 2016, at 7:51 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: >> On Jan 6, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> How would you envision this capability being provided? I wouldn't want to, >>> for