10.13 builder on our BuildBot is failing

Hi, Our 10.13 builder on build.macports.org is failing with: twisted.spread.pb.RemoteError: [Errno 23] Too many open files in system: '/opt/bblocal/var/buildworker/ports/ports-10_13_x86_64-watcher' -- Best regards, Zero King smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: poppler, security updates in general...

Hi, On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 04:39:05PM +0100, Rainer Müller wrote: > > I think you’re referring to Repology: > > > > https://repology.org > > > > No CVE linkages that I can see there. That would be a valuable > > resource though. That's the one, thanks. > I do not think Repology would offer

Re: GSOC 2018 org application period has begun

Hi, On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 08:36:39AM +0530, Jackson Isaac wrote: > That's great :) I'll help you out. Probably its time for me to become > a Mentor now ;) > > > Let me know what you think and also, if any other criteria MacPorts > > has. I'd be happy to volunteer. Could use someone as backup

Re: libressl vs openssl

On Jan 10 11:02:46, neum...@wu.ac.at wrote: > Am 09.01.18 um 18:24 schrieb Perry E. Metzger: > > On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 18:47:14 +0100 Jan Stary wrote: > > > Hi Jeremy, > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 06:03:17AM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston > > > > Sequoia wrote: > > > > > There are

Re: libressl vs openssl

On Jan 09 09:40:23, bl...@orcaware.com wrote: > https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/ > > "Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general > use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. > Doing so is likely to be frustrating

Re: libressl vs openssl

On Jan 09 12:24:22, pe...@piermont.com wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 18:47:14 +0100 Jan Stary wrote: > > Hi Jeremy, > > > > > On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 06:03:17AM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston > > > Sequoia wrote: > > > > There are some things that I want to do to the port (and > > > >

Re: poppler, security updates in general...

On 01/10/2018 04:00 PM, Craig Treleaven wrote: >> On Jan 10, 2018, at 4:20 AM, Clemens Lang wrote: >> That's correct. It would be nice if we had some tooling that could check >> for CVEs we haven't fixed yet. If you would like to grab some of the >> existing open source tooling

Re: poppler, security updates in general...

> On Jan 10, 2018, at 4:20 AM, Clemens Lang wrote: > > Hi Perry, > > - On 9 Jan, 2018, at 18:27, Perry E. Metzger pe...@piermont.com wrote: > >> I note the version of poppler we're shipping is pretty old, and that >> there are CVEs outstanding against it. >> >> Am I

Re: libressl vs openssl

Hi Jeremy, > > On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 06:03:17AM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > > > There are some things that I want to do to the port (and OpenSSL) what is the strategy with the libressl port as opposed to libressl-devel? Currently, libressl is 2.5.5 and libressl-devel is 2.6.2. I

Re: reclaim and rleaves

On 15 Dec 2017, at 15:51, db wrote: > Shouldn't reclaim use rleaves instead of unrequested? As of now I have to > rerun reclaim in order to remove unnecessary ports. Can anyone clarify why multiple runs of reclaim are necessary?

Re: poppler, security updates in general...

Hi Perry, - On 9 Jan, 2018, at 18:27, Perry E. Metzger pe...@piermont.com wrote: > I note the version of poppler we're shipping is pretty old, and that > there are CVEs outstanding against it. > > Am I correct in assuming that as things stand, we mostly depend on > port owners to track