Re: Port submission for aidadoc

-H > On Mar 7, 2018, at 03:24, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > >> On Mar 7, 2018, at 00:43, G Alexander wrote: >> >> I'd set a no cache flag so you don't get lots of cookie and cache garbage > > Huh? >

Re: Port submission for aidadoc

On Mar 7, 2018, at 00:43, G Alexander wrote: > I'd set a no cache flag so you don't get lots of cookie and cache garbage Huh?

Re: Port submission for aidadoc

I'd set a no cache flag so you don't get lots of cookie and cache garbage > On Mar 6, 2018, at 22:15, Bernard Desgraupes wrote: > > Dear Joshua, > > thank you for the insight. Everything is clear now and I discover the -I and > -L options of curl by the way, very handy

Re: Port submission for aidadoc

On 2018-3-7 06:52 , Bernard Desgraupes wrote: > I don’t really understand how the master-sites command works when it says > master_sitessourceforge:projects/aidadoc/files/${version}/ > > The « real » download URL is >

Re: Port submission for aidadoc

Mojca, thank you very much for reviewing this port. The other two checksums (if needed) are md528acc622599ae70bd9027fd80cf9f9b8 sha1aece1dbfdc342c63995a1bf7d7de525067038748 I don’t know why the download fails. Indeed I already have a dist file locally in

Re: Port submission for aidadoc

On 6 March 2018 at 10:47, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2018-3-6 20:23 , Bernard Desgraupes wrote: >> So, if I understand correctly, writing: >> use_autoreconfyes >> >> would enough to replace the following: >> pre-configure { >> system -W ${build.dir} autoheader >> } >> use_autoconf

Re: Port submission for aidadoc

On 2018-3-6 20:23 , Bernard Desgraupes wrote: > So, if I understand correctly, writing: > use_autoreconfyes > > would enough to replace the following: > pre-configure { > system -W ${build.dir} autoheader > } > use_autoconfyes > > Am I right ? In most cases yes. - Josh

Re: Port submission for aidadoc

So, if I understand correctly, writing: use_autoreconfyes would enough to replace the following: pre-configure { system -W ${build.dir} autoheader } use_autoconfyes Am I right ? Thanks, Bernard Le 6 mars 2018 à 10:17, Joshua Root a écrit : > On

Re: Port submission for aidadoc

On 2018-3-6 19:27 , Mojca Miklavec wrote: > I have a question for others: what's the "correct" way to run > autoheader > autoconf > before configure? We do have autoconf.cmd for example, but I'm not > sure about the best way to run more than one commands (unless I misuse > automake.cmd :)

Re: Port submission for aidadoc

On 6 March 2018 at 09:10, Bernard Desgraupes wrote: > Dear Mojca, > > I have made the recommended fixes and have just been attaching the modified > Portfile (added as Portfile.2). > This is Ticket #55808: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/55808 Thanks, but for some reason I'm unable to download

Re: Port submission for aidadoc

Dear Mojca, I have made the recommended fixes and have just been attaching the modified Portfile (added as Portfile.2). This is Ticket #55808: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/55808 cheers, Bernard Le 5 mars 2018 à 12:22, Mojca Miklavec a écrit : > Dear Bernard, > > On

Re: Port submission for aidadoc

Dear Mojca, thank you for your kind reply and all the suggestions you made on the ticket. I’ll fix my PortFile accordingly and resubmit later. Cheers, Bernard Le 5 mars 2018 à 12:22, Mojca Miklavec a écrit : > Dear Bernard, > > On 5 March 2018 at 12:06, Bernard Desgraupes

Re: Port submission for aidadoc

Dear Bernard, On 5 March 2018 at 12:06, Bernard Desgraupes wrote: > Hi, > > I have submitted, three weeks ago, a new port via a submission ticket > (https://trac.macports.org/ticket/55808) but it doesn't seem to have received > any attention. > It concerns the aidadoc project (see >

Port submission for aidadoc

Hi, I have submitted, three weeks ago, a new port via a submission ticket (https://trac.macports.org/ticket/55808) but it doesn't seem to have received any attention. It concerns the aidadoc project (see https://sourceforge.net/projects/aidadoc). No rush but could someone review my ticket ?