Re: libressl vs openssl

2018-01-11 Thread Jan Stary
On Jan 11 07:07:42, ryandes...@macports.org wrote: > > On Jan 10, 2018, at 14:49, Jan Stary wrote: > > > On Jan 09 09:40:23, Blair Zajac wrote: > >> https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/ > >> > >> "Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for > >> general use,

Re: libressl vs openssl

2018-01-11 Thread Watson Ladd
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Jan Stary wrote: > On Jan 09 12:24:22, pe...@piermont.com wrote: >> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 18:47:14 +0100 Jan Stary wrote: >> > Hi Jeremy, >> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 06:03:17AM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston >> > > Sequoia wrote: >> >

Re: libressl vs openssl

2018-01-11 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 10, 2018, at 06:33, Jan Stary wrote: > what is the strategy with the libressl port as opposed to libressl-devel? > Currently, libressl is 2.5.5 and libressl-devel is 2.6.2. > > I don't think upstream even considers "devel" releases in any sense, > a release is a release. Is there

Re: libressl vs openssl

2018-01-11 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 10, 2018, at 14:49, Jan Stary wrote: > On Jan 09 09:40:23, Blair Zajac wrote: >> https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/ >> >> "Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for >> general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend >> upon

Re: libressl vs openssl

2018-01-10 Thread Jan Stary
On Jan 10 11:02:46, neum...@wu.ac.at wrote: > Am 09.01.18 um 18:24 schrieb Perry E. Metzger: > > On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 18:47:14 +0100 Jan Stary wrote: > > > Hi Jeremy, > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 06:03:17AM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston > > > > Sequoia wrote: > > > > > There are

Re: libressl vs openssl

2018-01-10 Thread Jan Stary
On Jan 09 09:40:23, bl...@orcaware.com wrote: > https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/ > > "Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general > use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. > Doing so is likely to be frustrating

Re: libressl vs openssl

2018-01-10 Thread Jan Stary
On Jan 09 12:24:22, pe...@piermont.com wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 18:47:14 +0100 Jan Stary wrote: > > Hi Jeremy, > > > > > On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 06:03:17AM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston > > > Sequoia wrote: > > > > There are some things that I want to do to the port (and > > > >

Re: libressl vs openssl

2018-01-10 Thread Jan Stary
Hi Jeremy, > > On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 06:03:17AM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > > > There are some things that I want to do to the port (and OpenSSL) what is the strategy with the libressl port as opposed to libressl-devel? Currently, libressl is 2.5.5 and libressl-devel is 2.6.2. I

Re: libressl vs openssl

2018-01-09 Thread Blair Zajac
> On Jan 9, 2018, at 9:24 AM, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 18:47:14 +0100 Jan Stary wrote: >> Hi Jeremy, >> >>> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 06:03:17AM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston >>> Sequoia wrote: There are some things that I want to do

Re: libressl vs openssl

2018-01-09 Thread Perry E. Metzger
On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 18:47:14 +0100 Jan Stary wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > > On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 06:03:17AM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston > > Sequoia wrote: > > > There are some things that I want to do to the port (and > > > OpenSSL) > > It would be very nice if all ports currently

libressl vs openssl

2018-01-08 Thread Jan Stary
Hi Jeremy, > On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 06:03:17AM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > > There are some things that I want to do to the port (and OpenSSL) It would be very nice if all ports currently depending on openssl would build against libressl, and we could get rid of openssl in favor