Re: [GSoC] migration

On 20 Jul 2017, at 06:04, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > Snapshot and restore should be able to be executed without migrate. I have a question and I haven't been following in detail this GSoC, so bear with me. Could snapshot and restore be used to rollback to a previous

Re: registry with multiple portfiles

On 17 Jul 2017, at 10:38, Joshua Root wrote: > Don't delete anything from the database, its contents are correct (and have > been the whole time). You can delete the portfiles that are in a directory > named after a port (or version of a port) that is not installed. Those

Re: registry with multiple portfiles

On 13 Jul 2017, at 18:08, Joshua Root wrote: > Fixed in master: > I understand that there's no additional name field for subports in the registry and that they have the same hash. But

Re: registry with multiple portfiles

anually checked the reg db yet.

Re: registry with multiple portfiles

On 11 Jul 2017, at 18:40, db <iams...@gmail.com> wrote: > While writing the portfile for py-ipaddr in vim I saved it and stopped the > process, then installed/uninstalled the port and made some corrections in the > portfile, repeat. I tried this with another port while monitori

Re: tarball link when using python group

On 9 Jul 2017, at 23:29, Joshua Root wrote: > Solution 2: Use the github portgroup, which takes care of the idiosyncrasies > of fetching from github. It's fine to use at the same time as the python > portgroup, see e.g. py-alabaster. Thanks for the reference. I was missing

Re: registry with multiple portfiles

On 11 Jul 2017, at 19:21, Joshua Root wrote: >> I think I might explain this case — but not others. While writing the >> portfile for py-ipaddr in vim I saved it and stopped the process, then >> installed/uninstalled the port and made some corrections in the portfile, >>

Re: registry with multiple portfiles

On 11 Jul 2017, at 16:16, Joshua Root wrote: > How do the files differ? Is one not referenced in the registry database? port cat shows the right file. I think I might explain this case — but not others. While writing the portfile for py-ipaddr in vim I saved it and stopped

Re: install doc with python group

On 11 Jul 2017, at 14:44, Joshua Root wrote: > Only the subports like py27-setuptools_hg and py35-setuptools_hg are supposed > to install any files. py-setuptools_hg is a stub port, and as such has no > distfiles and thus no extracted sources. I know why it fails. The stub

registry with multiple portfiles

Is it normal or expected to have multiple portfiles for the same port in the registry?

Re: Python 3.4

On 8 May 2017, at 18:36, m...@macports.org wrote: >> - Should we actively remove 34 subports? > When py35 and py36 have more sub-ports, then yes. I wonder how many of those are maintained, of these how many actually get updated and how many are non-maintained at all.

env python - port select or reinplace

What should I use to reference the python binary, put notes to use port select or rewrite the interpreter directive?

Re: pypi2port and python supported versions

On 24 Apr 2017, at 19:10, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > In short: > - we probably need a bit more effort to bring all modules to 3.6 > - we probably need to review which entries may go from py-graveyard > and potentially change the others to default to 36 rather than 34

Re: python port - use pypi or github

On 10 Apr 2017, at 12:59, Clemens Lang wrote: > It's up to you, really. pypi2port might be easier, because it auto-generates > most > of the boilerplate and is better tested, since most python ports use PyPI. Ok, I just want to avoid having too much divergence between current

python port - use pypi or github

When writing a python port, what is best practice for one that's on both PyPI and GitHub, use pypi2port or portgroups github+python?

<    1   2