Re: [51915] trunk/dports/lang

2009-06-08 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jun 6, 2009, at 04:08, t...@macports.org wrote: Revision: 51915 http://trac.macports.org/changeset/51915 Author: t...@macports.org Date: 2009-06-06 02:08:48 -0700 (Sat, 06 Jun 2009) Log Message: --- SnowLeopard default was set back to gcc-4.2, no need to explicitly

Re: fail2ban

2009-06-08 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jun 6, 2009, at 15:28, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: On Jun 6, 2009, at 1:09 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: What is the macports way to get python26 into my paths? python2.6 installed by MacPorts is already in your path. To get a symlink called python pointing to it, use python_select as

Re: creating two launchd items

2009-06-08 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jun 7, 2009, at 03:03, Joshua Root wrote: On 2009-6-7 17:43, Bryan Blackburn wrote: Looks like /Library is considered to be not a violation, so no need for destroot.violate_mtree. This will be changing in 1.8, however. I noticed your recent commit that removed this exemption. So how

Re: Sip 4.8 / PyQt 4.5

2009-06-08 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jun 6, 2009, at 13:43, vincent habchi wrote: For those who are in a hurry, here are Portfiles corresponding to the brand new releases of Sip (first file) and PyQt – the latter at last compatible with qt 4.5.1. Universal builds are supported, though of course Sip must be built universal

Re: Is it time to start regression testing yet?

2009-06-08 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 6 June 2009 12:43:36 -0700 Jordan K. Hubbard j...@apple.com wrote: and if there are no users of a port to report errors, then who really cares if it's broken? All the users who come to MacPorts, give it a go, then go away without reporting the errors that cause them to give up. It's

Re: Sip 4.8 / PyQt 4.5

2009-06-08 Thread vincent habchi
Hi Ryan, New portfiles should typically be contributed by filing a ticket in the issue tracker and attaching the new portfile there. http://guide.macports.org/#project.tickets Ok, I'll do that. Sorry for the noise. Also, as soon as the software are released, I'll be adding a couple of

Re: [51915] trunk/dports/lang

2009-06-08 Thread Toby Peterson
On Jun 8, 2009, at 12:26 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jun 6, 2009, at 04:08, t...@macports.org wrote: Revision: 51915 http://trac.macports.org/changeset/51915 Author: t...@macports.org Date: 2009-06-06 02:08:48 -0700 (Sat, 06 Jun 2009) Log Message: --- SnowLeopard default

Re: creating two launchd items

2009-06-08 Thread Joshua Root
On 2009-6-9 02:03, Blair Zajac wrote: On Jun 8, 2009, at 3:01 AM, Joshua Root wrote: On 2009-6-8 19:01, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jun 7, 2009, at 03:03, Joshua Root wrote: On 2009-6-7 17:43, Bryan Blackburn wrote: Looks like /Library is considered to be not a violation, so no need for

Re: Sip 4.8 / PyQt 4.5

2009-06-08 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jun 8, 2009, at 14:54, vincent habchi wrote: thank you for all your advice. I clearly copied the portfile of the old versions, converted them to my own conventions (e.g. tabs instead of spaces) and then tested them. They were by no means meant to be drop-in replacement for the old

Re: Is it time to start regression testing yet?

2009-06-08 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jun 6, 2009, at 15:36, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: http://portmill.florianebeling.com/ is doing a default build for all ports if I'm not mistaken. I'm just getting back to this thread. Thank you for your work on this, Florian! Some friendly criticism: I imagine you've been working on this

Re: Is it time to start regression testing yet?

2009-06-08 Thread Scott Haneda
On Jun 8, 2009, at 2:18 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: So, and automated test suite would (a) get errors diagnosed and fixed quicker, (b) reduce the number of errors as a result, and (c) give us a way of flagging them before a user starts a 20 minute build process. I have been reading this

Re: Is it time to start regression testing yet?

2009-06-08 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jun 8, 2009, at 15:49, Scott Haneda wrote: On Jun 8, 2009, at 2:18 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: So, and automated test suite would (a) get errors diagnosed and fixed quicker, (b) reduce the number of errors as a result, and (c) give us a way of flagging them before a user starts a 20 minute

Re: Is it time to start regression testing yet?

2009-06-08 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Jun 8, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: It is also a very good way to get an exact idea of what ports are being installed. You can then see that port x has been installed 400 times, 390 of those with no issues, 10 of those with some issue. I proposed this two years ago but was shot

Re: Is it time to start regression testing yet?

2009-06-08 Thread Bryan Blackburn
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 03:36:21PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt said: [...] You said you wrote this with Rails and CouchDB. While I understand the desire to write using technologies you're familiar with, MacPorts is written in Tcl, and the main MacPorts web site is written in PHP and MySQL, and it

Re: Is it time to start regression testing yet?

2009-06-08 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
I'll take on the rewriting to PHP this summer if it needs to be done. On Jun 8, 2009, at 7:54 PM, Bryan Blackburn wrote: Of course it doesn't really lower the barrier if someone knows Rails but not PHP, especially when quite a bit of code has already been written. While trying to stay

Re: [52043] trunk/dports/tex/texlive_base

2009-06-08 Thread Bryan Blackburn
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 02:29:16PM -0700, jerem...@macports.org said: Revision: 52043 http://trac.macports.org/changeset/52043 Author: jerem...@macports.org Date: 2009-06-08 14:29:15 -0700 (Mon, 08 Jun 2009) Log Message: --- texlive_base: Use freetype instead of

Re: Is it time to start regression testing yet?

2009-06-08 Thread Andre Stechert
2009/6/8 Scott Haneda talkli...@newgeo.com: On Jun 8, 2009, at 2:46 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: I proposed this two years ago but was shot down because this was considered an invasion of privacy and people didn't want MacPorts phoning home. I had wanted to have a nice status display on the

Re: Is it time to start regression testing yet?

2009-06-08 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
There's a difference between a crash and a failed compilation in that the system can't just catch it. Apple also pays people to look at those crash reports. We're almost entirely unpaid volunteers with a variable body count. On Jun 8, 2009, at 8:26 PM, Andre Stechert wrote: If a program

Re: [52043] trunk/dports/tex/texlive_base

2009-06-08 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
xdvi can use either motif or xaw. It builds binaries for both if both are available. xdvi-motif.bin is the file that actually links against it. --Jeremy On Jun 8, 2009, at 17:01, Bryan Blackburn wrote: On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 02:29:16PM -0700, jerem...@macports.org said: Revision: 52043

Re: Is it time to start regression testing yet?

2009-06-08 Thread Jim Meyer
On 6/8/09 4:56 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: I'll take on the rewriting to PHP this summer if it needs to be done. And I'll volunteer to help with the Rails upkeep if not. =] --j On Jun 8, 2009, at 7:54 PM, Bryan Blackburn wrote: Of course it doesn't really lower the barrier if someone

Re: Is it time to start regression testing yet?

2009-06-08 Thread Jim Meyer
On 6/8/09 6:17 PM, Jim Meyer wrote: On 6/8/09 2:46 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: It is also a very good way to get an exact idea of what ports are being installed. You can then see that port x has been installed 400 times, 390 of those with no issues, 10 of those with some issue. I proposed this

Default compiler for Snow Leopard

2009-06-08 Thread Darren Weber
Is there any plan to define or redefine the default compiler for Snow Leopard? Some folks may have access to a developer preview of Snow Leopard soon, what do you recommend to maintain the integrity of an existing MacPorts installation under Leopard, after the upgrade to Snow Leopard? Take care,

Re: Default compiler for Snow Leopard

2009-06-08 Thread Toby Peterson
On Jun 8, 2009, at 10:22 PM, Darren Weber wrote: Is there any plan to define or redefine the default compiler for Snow Leopard? Some folks may have access to a developer preview of Snow Leopard soon, what do you recommend to maintain the integrity of an existing MacPorts installation

Removing configure options

2009-06-08 Thread Scott Haneda
I have the most basic of a port file and I can not get it to work. Here is how I do it by hand cd ~/Downloads/rbldnsd sudo -s ./consigure make cp rbldnsd var/rbldnsd I am done at that point. sudo port -d install in my local repo DEBUG: Assembled command: 'cd /opt/local/var/macports/build/

Re: Removing configure options

2009-06-08 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
Check out this command for ideas on why prefix isn't working: ./configure --help If you need to override the configure arguments in MacPorts, that's done via configure.args-append and configure.args-delete On Jun 9, 2009, at 1:43 AM, Scott Haneda wrote: I have the most basic of a port

Re: Removing configure options

2009-06-08 Thread Scott Haneda
I tried configure.args-delete, do I have to quote it? configure.args-delete --prefix=/opt/local Thanks On Jun 8, 2009, at 10:46 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: Check out this command for ideas on why prefix isn't working: ./configure --help If you need to override the configure arguments in

Re: Removing configure options

2009-06-08 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
My apologies: the prefix is located in configure.pre_args. Please try: configure.pre_args-delete --prefix=/opt/local I believe you shouldn't need to quote it unless there's a space in it. On Jun 9, 2009, at 1:54 AM, Scott Haneda wrote: I tried configure.args-delete, do I have to quote it?