On Jul 28, 2020, at 20:29, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> I'll ask them if they want to enable older algorithms or allow non-https
> access. If they want to do neither, I'll configure MacPorts to remove that
> mirror on OS versions that can't connect to it.
They've reinstated old ciphers so now it'll
On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jul 28, 2020, at 20:29, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I'll ask them if they want to enable older algorithms or allow
non-https access. If they want to do neither, I'll configure MacPorts
to remove that mirror on OS versions that can't connect to it.
They'v
there seems to be demand for replicating the “binary only” installers of
homebrew cask.
we have a few ports that do that now, and I see more and more coming in.
I have used homebrew cask from time to time to see what it’s up to. It is
convenient at times. I also downloaded a lot of things that
On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Ken Cunningham wrote:
there seems to be demand for replicating the “binary only” installers of
homebrew cask.
we have a few ports that do that now, and I see more and more coming in.
From the user's perspective, how does that differ from a port that's
available as a bi
On Jul 29, 2020, at 9:30 PM, Fred Wright wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Ken Cunningham wrote:
>> there seems to be demand for replicating the “binary only” installers of
>> homebrew cask.
>>
>> we have a few ports that do that now, and I see more and more coming in.
>
>> From the user's perspect
> >> From the user's perspective, how does that differ from a port that's
> > available as a binary archive? I presume the idea is that it directly uses
> > a precompiled binary from the upstream source, but from the user's
> > perspective, does it really matter whether it was a binary from ups
