Rainer Müller wrote:
For one
thing, if you are running on Mac OS X you are not running on pure
darwin;
ah ?
i thought that pure darwin was the UNIX layer under the GUI, not
only the OS for those who don't have GUI at all
No, puredarwin is http://puredarwin.org.
The +puredarwin variant
Hi,
Probably not.
If you're trying to set up a complete desktop environment (this file
defines a desktop applications menu) then you probably need to decide
whether you want to use gnome or kde.
Technically, there is no reason why he cannot have gnome and KDE
installed at the same time.
Hi all,
I searched Trac for this and asked on IRC, hoping someone here has
some good info. I've installed OpenLDAP and have it set up to run
from the command line properly, but over the course of a few months,
have found that my PostgreSQL starts properly via daemondo / launchd
and
On Apr 27, 2009, at 11:02, Chris Jones wrote:
Probably not.
If you're trying to set up a complete desktop environment (this
file defines a desktop applications menu) then you probably need
to decide
whether you want to use gnome or kde.
Technically, there is no reason why he cannot have
On Apr 27, 2009, at 12:02, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Apr 27, 2009, at 11:02, Chris Jones wrote:
Probably not.
If you're trying to set up a complete desktop environment (this
file defines a desktop applications menu) then you probably need
to decide
whether you want to use gnome or kde.
I've been working through the gnome dependency tree from the bottom up
upgrading to 2.26 which is way over due. However, I think on going
maintainership of gnome is more than a one man task. So I'm willing to
be a co-maintainer if others will also participate.
With regard to QA, a major
I've been working through the gnome dependency tree from the bottom up
upgrading to 2.26 which is way over due. However, I think on going
maintainership of gnome is more than a one man task. So I'm willing to
be a co-maintainer if others will also participate.
With regard to QA, a major
On Apr 27, 2009, at 14:30, David Evans wrote:
I've been working through the gnome dependency tree from the bottom up
upgrading to 2.26 which is way over due. However, I think on going
maintainership of gnome is more than a one man task. So I'm
willing to
be a co-maintainer if others will
Of course I figure this out as soon as I post... lol. I need to get a
dog so I can ask him technical problems first.
It appears that the 'ldap' account is not set up with adequate
permissions to run. There are a few issues:
1. /opt/local/var/run is set up with permissions as root:admin
I have not had enough experience with VTK to know how compatible it is
across minor version releases. To provide flexibility, I've assumed that
vtkXY should be sufficient to provide the major.minor (X.Y) version
specificity for any port that depends on VTK (ie, I've not considered vtkXYZ
David Evans wrote:
With regard to QA, a major problem with MacPorts is the lack of a
separate port tree for ports under test. With something as far reaching
as gnome or kde, when a major revision occurs, it would be better to
work out all the kinks for the suite of ports in such a testing
Rainer Müller wrote:
David Evans wrote:
With regard to QA, a major problem with MacPorts is the lack of a
separate port tree for ports under test. With something as far reaching
as gnome or kde, when a major revision occurs, it would be better to
work out all the kinks for the suite of
So for awhile I've had had Leopard and Mysql 5 running in concert with
Rails. I installed the macports version of Mysql5 because my original
installation apparently didn't have all the libraries that the plugin
thinking_sphinx needs.
Long story short, I'm getting this error message when trying to
Confused; you stated you installed MySql from ports, so you should
have your data in /opt/local already?
Maybe you mean you had an OS X mysql binary distro installed, and you
now have installed mysql via mac ports and you want your data to move
over to the mac ports side of things?
If
14 matches
Mail list logo
