gcc-mp-4.8 -march=native fails

2014-03-17 Thread Watson Ladd
Dear all, When I attempt to compile a C program using -march=native I receive a bunch of errors about nonexistent instructions in temporary assembler files. This does not happen without that command. Does anyone have any bright ideas for how to fix this? Has anyone else had this problem and been a

glib user_data_dir set to /opt/local/share

2014-03-17 Thread Jonathan Koren
I’m on Mavricks with MacPorts 2.2.1 I recently upgraded the meld port (@1.8.4), and now when ever I try to run it, it blows up with an OSError. (OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/opt/local/share/meld/recent-NbPmhP.meldcmp’ ) Looking into it, it appears that the problem is that meld want

Re: usage numbers for macports vs. homebrew?

2014-03-17 Thread Davor Cubranic
On Mar 12, 2014, at 2:12 PM, Art McGee wrote: > The problem is that the presentation of the case for supporting MacPorts was > confusing and unconvincing, so usage statistics are not going to help in that > matter. I’ve been wondering why Homebrew has such huge momentum and mindshare these da

Re: taskgated: no signature

2014-03-17 Thread Ian Wadham
Thanks, Brandon. You have given me some leads I can get my teeth into … or google. And you dated me pretty accurately re SVR4. I knew quite a bit about UNIX before that, but System V Release 4 was my first "hands-on" experience --- 1989-1998, with H-P, Sun, Prime and ICL. Cheers, Ian W. On 18/0

Re: taskgated: no signature

2014-03-17 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Ian Wadham wrote: > 1. The check seems to be to prevent a program from starting a > foreign process that could compromise the O/S (e.g. spyware?). > In the long term, should MacPorts be recomending bypassing it > with the -p and -s options? I presume

Re: clang memory usage vs. gcc (and OS X 10.8, 10.9, ...)

2014-03-17 Thread James Linder
On 18 Mar 2014, at 3:00 am, macports-users-requ...@lists.macosforge.org wrote: >> Well yes, of course. I was thinking as much as a test, to see if its the >> optimisations that are the issue, as it is for me, than as a solution. In my >> case i simply could not compile at all without -O0... wit

Re: taskgated: no signature

2014-03-17 Thread Ian Wadham
On 17/03/2014, at 8:51 AM, Eric Gallager wrote: > Yeah, that was all I meant by saying "on Mountain Lion and higher" was that > it was conditionally declared like that; I did not mean to imply that I was > on Mountain Lion myself... (I am actually still on Snow Leopard so `port > notes gdb-apple

Re: taskgated: no signature

2014-03-17 Thread James Linder
On 18 Mar 2014, at 3:00 am, macports-users-requ...@lists.macosforge.org wrote: > Yeah, that was all I meant by saying "on Mountain Lion and higher" was that > it was conditionally declared like that; I did *not* mean to imply that I > was on Mountain Lion myself... (I am actually still on Snow Le

sandboxd message

2014-03-17 Thread Craig Treleaven
Hi: I re-purposed a Core2 Duo mini running 10.7.5 over the weekend. I'm trying to set up Time Machine to backup the machine and it is running very slowly (est 20+ hours for a 56 GB backup). It may not be related to the slow Time Machine backup, but I'm getting the following Console message

Re: qt4-mac : still dependent on Carbon.framework?

2014-03-17 Thread Michael Dickens
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014, at 09:36 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > On Sunday March 16 2014 18:42:53 you wrote: > > about for some project that's using QtGui via QMake, for which removing > > the linking with Carbon worked? I've never tried the former, and the > > latter could easily work depending on th

Re: clang memory usage vs. gcc (and OS X 10.8, 10.9, ...)

2014-03-17 Thread René J.V. Bertin
Hi, On Mar 16, 2014, at 18:05, Chris Jones wrote: > Well yes, of course. I was thinking as much as a test, to see if its the > optimisations that are the issue, as it is for me, than as a solution. In my > case i simply could not compile at all without -O0... without it, the memory > usage hit

Re: moving install dir back to /opt/local : what config files to edit?

2014-03-17 Thread René J.V. Bertin
On Mar 16, 2014, at 20:13, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > You might consider checking that the destination of your symlink has > appropriate permissions. My guess is something over there no longer matches > up. You could have had a point with permissions of the symlink, but in the end the issue was