Sadly, there's no way to figure out how many OS X 10.3 users exist.
This number is probably the most important one to take into account
deciding whether MacPorts should support OS X 10.3 or not.
Assuming Apple supports OSs as long as there're fair amount of users,
this might be a good idea to
Official MacPorts policy has been that we support the two most
recent versions of Mac OS. Which at the present means Tiger and
Leopard. That doesn't mean that we'll go out of our way to break older
versions, but that we don't promise we won't.
A particularly good example of why this is
BTW, Does Official support mean anything?
Just another name of priority?
On Nov 22, 2007 11:48 PM, James Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Official MacPorts policy has been that we support the two most
recent versions of Mac OS. Which at the present means Tiger and
Leopard. That doesn't mean that
On Nov 22, 2007, at 7:26 AM, js wrote:
BTW, Does Official support mean anything?
Just another name of priority?
I said official policy, not official support. MacPorts provides no
official support for anything, though unofficial and informal support
is available through this email list
Apple is still supporting 10.3 updates to itunes, quicktime and
security are regular.
I hope it will still be supported by macports as well.
Marco
On Nov 20, 2007, at 2:40 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Nov 19, 2007, at 14:02, Weissmann Markus wrote:
10.3 is not
On Nov 19, 2007, at 14:02, Weissmann Markus wrote:
10.3 is not officially supported anymore*) and I do not even have
access to a 10.3 box.
I'll happily add any patch for 10.3 that does not conflict with
10.4 or 10.5 but I don't have a way of testing it.
-Markus
*) which doesn't mean
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Nov 19, 2007, at 14:02, Weissmann Markus wrote:
10.3 is not officially supported anymore*) and I do not even have
access to a 10.3 box.
This is the first I've heard of 10.3 not being supported anymore.
Historically MacPorts has supported the current Mac OS X release
