Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released - problems with the progress lines

2012-05-16 Thread James Berry
On May 16, 2012, at 3:51 PM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > Clemens Lang wrote: >> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:17:02PM +0100, Chris Jones wrote: > Is there something I can do to switch this progess thingy off ??? >> >>> disabling the feature isn't really the same thing as just disabling >>> the

Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released - problems with the progress lines

2012-05-16 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Clemens Lang wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:17:02PM +0100, Chris Jones wrote: Is there something I can do to switch this progess thingy off ??? > >> disabling the feature isn't really the same thing as just disabling >> the eye-candy progress count-down. I suspect you are not the only on

Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released - problems with the progress lines

2012-05-16 Thread Chris Jones
On 16 May 2012, at 6:07am, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > Removing macports-dev since this isn't a development issue. Not sure I agree there. > > On May 16, 2012, at 12:59 a.m., Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > >> Is there something I can do to switch this progess thingy off ??? > > > I'm not sure

Re : archive_site_local [was: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released]

2012-05-16 Thread C D
  Hello, 1) On 2012-5-16, Joshua Root wrote: > archive_site_local still works for me BTW.  Well, for me (as I said) it stopped working. To restore its behaviour, I had to add ":tbz2" after the URL, like this: archive_site_local  http://localhost:6227/:tbz2 2) I submitted a patch in #3201

Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released - problems with the progress lines

2012-05-15 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
Removing macports-dev since this isn't a development issue. On May 16, 2012, at 12:59 a.m., Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > Is there something I can do to switch this progess thingy off ??? I'm not sure if there's a way to disable the output. You can do upgrades without rev-upgrade with the --no-r

Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released - problems with the progress lines

2012-05-15 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
I've noticed these two new lines in my output: ---> Updating database of binaries: 100.0% ---> Scanning binaries for linking errors: 100.0% My problem is with the progress of the percentages in combination with updating ports automatically using a script in periodic daily logging to syslog. That

Re: archive_site_local [was: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released]

2012-05-15 Thread Joshua Root
On 2012-5-16 06:09 , Joshua Root wrote: > On 2012-5-16 06:01 , Arno Hautala wrote: >> On 5/15/12, C D wrote: >>> >>> Then there might be a bug: following the procedure in >>> https://trac.macports.org/wiki/howto/ShareArchives2, I have set up a local >>> archive repository, which I access through

Re: archive_site_local [was: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released]

2012-05-15 Thread Joshua Root
On 2012-5-16 06:01 , Arno Hautala wrote: > On 5/15/12, C D wrote: >> >> Then there might be a bug: following the procedure in >> https://trac.macports.org/wiki/howto/ShareArchives2, I have set up a local >> archive repository, which I access through the URL http://localhost:6227/ . >> When this U

Re: archive_site_local [was: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released]

2012-05-15 Thread Arno Hautala
On 5/15/12, C D wrote: > > Then there might be a bug: following the procedure in > https://trac.macports.org/wiki/howto/ShareArchives2, I have set up a local > archive repository, which I access through the URL http://localhost:6227/ . > When this URL is put into ${prefix}/etc/archive_sites.conf,

Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released

2012-05-15 Thread Craig Treleaven
At 4:17 AM +1000 5/16/12, Joshua Root wrote: On 2012-5-16 03:55 , Craig Treleaven wrote: Thanks to the devs for all their work. In the NEWS, I noticed a couple of points: == Overview of changes from MacPorts 2.0.4 to 2.1.0 == *) The pkg and mpkg targets will create flat packages on 10.6

archive_site_local [was: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released]

2012-05-15 Thread C D
> The MacPorts Project is happy to announce that the 2.1.0 version has now > been released.   Thanks to all for the work!  It seems that 'archive_site_local' in macports.conf is now ignored (at least it stopped working for me after the upgrade to MacPorts 2.1.0). I understand that it has been r

Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released

2012-05-15 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 15, 2012, at 12:55, Craig Treleaven wrote: > In the NEWS, I noticed a couple of points: > >> == Overview of changes from MacPorts 2.0.4 to 2.1.0 == >> >> *) The pkg and mpkg targets will create flat packages on 10.6+. >> >> >> *) Multiple ports can now be defined in one Portfile using

Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released

2012-05-15 Thread Joshua Root
On 2012-5-16 03:55 , Craig Treleaven wrote: > Thanks to the devs for all their work. > > In the NEWS, I noticed a couple of points: > >> == Overview of changes from MacPorts 2.0.4 to 2.1.0 == >> >> *) The pkg and mpkg targets will create flat packages on 10.6+. >> >> >> *) Multiple ports can no

Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released

2012-05-15 Thread Craig Treleaven
At 1:29 AM +1000 5/16/12, Joshua Root wrote: The list of what's new in 2.1.0 is quite extensive (so I won't list it here), the details can be found in the NEWS [7] file or the somewhat more exhaustive ChangeLog [8]. [7]

Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released

2012-05-15 Thread Phil Dobbin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15/05/2012 18:07, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: >> Makes sense (& the fact the whole of /Library is set executable). >> I just wondered why it was pointed it out in the message & Tcl >> was mentioned explicitly. > > It's just letting you know what it's d

Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released

2012-05-15 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
> Makes sense (& the fact the whole of /Library is set executable). I > just wondered why it was pointed it out in the message & Tcl was > mentioned explicitly. It's just letting you know what it's doing and where. It probably reflects any change you might have made if you were compiling it outsi

Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released

2012-05-15 Thread Phil Dobbin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15/05/2012 17:54, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: >> I've just upgraded via selfupdate on 10.6.8 & got a message about >> Tcl's executable bit being set: >> >> `MacPorts base is outdated, installing new version 2.1.0 >> Installing new MacPorts release in

Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released

2012-05-15 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
> I've just upgraded via selfupdate on 10.6.8 & got a message about Tcl's > executable bit being set: > > `MacPorts base is outdated, installing new version 2.1.0 > Installing new MacPorts release in /opt/local as root:admin; permissions > 0755; Tcl-Package in /Library/Tcl` > > upon doing a `ls -

Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released

2012-05-15 Thread Phil Dobbin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15/05/2012 16:29, Joshua Root wrote: > The MacPorts Project is happy to announce that the 2.1.0 version has now > been released. It is available via the usual methods: [snip] I've just upgraded via selfupdate on 10.6.8 & got a message about Tcl's

MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released

2012-05-15 Thread Joshua Root
The MacPorts Project is happy to announce that the 2.1.0 version has now been released. It is available via the usual methods: - selfupdate if you already have MacPorts installed - package installers for 10.5 [1], 10.6 [2], and 10.7 [3] (all universal builds, the first i386/ppc and the latter