Background:
I've tried, many times, to get Amarok working on my iMac. I spent about 10
years running a business based on my own software on Linux, so I'm used to
Linux and still prefer some Linux programs to what I cat get on OS X. However,
I have a VERY limited experience with C or C++ or
Okay, I think I've got it working properly now. (At least it worked for me.)
See the link I included for my comments. Basically I edited
/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_ports_audio_liblastfm/work/liblastfm-0.3.0
to read as was already
Hi !
On 15 mai 08, at 22:47, Simon Wheatley wrote:
Simon Wheatley wrote:
Is it possible to point MacPorts at a downloaded package of some
kind and say install that? Something similar to Debian's 'dpkg -i'?
Thanks all. I'll have a go with the various suggestions.
Did you have any success
Simon Wheatley wrote:
Is it possible to point MacPorts at a downloaded package of some
kind and say install that? Something similar to Debian's 'dpkg -i'?
Thanks all. I'll have a go with the various suggestions.
S
___
macports-users mailing list
Is it possible to point MacPorts at a downloaded package of some kind
and say install that? Something similar to Debian's 'dpkg -i'?
Thanks.
S
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
Simon Wheatley wrote:
Is it possible to point MacPorts at a downloaded package of some
kind and say install that? Something similar to Debian's 'dpkg -i'?
Not at the moment... You can build a package (pkg/rpm/deb), but then
it doesn't integrate with the already installed ports and registry
On 14/mag/08, at 09:59, Simon Wheatley wrote:
Is it possible to point MacPorts at a downloaded package of some
kind and say install that? Something similar to Debian's 'dpkg -i'?
If you're trying to avoid the need of an internet connection you could
just get the tarballs and put them in
On May 14, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Andrea D'Amore wrote:
On 14/mag/08, at 09:59, Simon Wheatley wrote:
Is it possible to point MacPorts at a downloaded package of some
kind and say install that? Something similar to Debian's 'dpkg -i'?
If you're trying to avoid the need of an internet
On May 14, 2008, at 5:39 PM, Robert Liesenfeld wrote:
I think this is what the port fetch portname command does, isn't it?
yep, although it's possible for variants to alter which files are
fetched, so you have to be a little careful if you want to make sure
you get all the files that you
Robert Liesenfeld wrote:
On May 14, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Andrea D'Amore wrote:
If you're trying to avoid the need of an internet connection you
could just get the tarballs and put them in appropriate folders in
distfiles dir.
I think this is what the port fetch portname command does, isn't
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:42 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 12:39:48 +0200
From: Anders F Bj?rklund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Manual install
To: Simon Wheatley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: liste gtk macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL
On May 14, 2008, at 6:50 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
The reason I ask is that a. it would be very useful to have this
feature, especially on systems without a lot of horsepower (given
the high degree of standardization on this hardware, why compile
anything yourself, if a compile farm exists
12 matches
Mail list logo
