Everyone:
Recently, the GNOME developers wrote a replacement for scrollkeeper
named rarian. rarian is a drop-in replacement for scrollkeeper with
the advantage of continuing active development and support as well as
other under-the-hood improvements.
Unfortunately, it has caused some problems
On Apr 6, 2008, at 8:14 PM, Randall Wood wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 10:48 AM, William Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 6, 2008, at 4:26 AM, Randall Wood wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 1:55 AM, William Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
dang it all
you have fixed scrollkeeper so I
Yo yo! Hey kids, please calm down a little.
I mean, it's almost like I can't feel the love in this room anymore.
- Zav
Valium. It's not just for breakfast anymore.
And I find your presumption of ignorance of basics on my part
instead of looking at the problem rather inept.
macintosh:~
:
/opt/local/bin/rarian-example
/opt/local/bin/rarian-sk-config
[...]
/opt/local/bin/scrollkeeper-config
/opt/local/bin/scrollkeeper-extract
[...]
/opt/local/bin/scrollkeeper-update
[...]
bug-buddy already use
system ${prefix}/bin/scrollkeeper-update
instead of the simpler
On Apr 6, 2008, at 8:14 PM, Randall Wood wrote:
There are no ports that depend on scrollkeeper. None. Every port
that
had a dependency on scrollkeeper now has a dependency on rarian. Try
sudo port selfupdate ; sudo port clean --all all ; sudo port upgrade
outdated
and see
On Apr 7, 2008, at 9:10 AM, William Davis wrote:
As I previously reported: I did (and still do) have rarian installed.
Have you already tried to reinstall it with
sudo port -f uninstall rarian ; sudo port install rarian ?
-Guido
___
install rarian ?
I think I might understand the problem now. At some point port may
have attempted to activate, and been blocked by the then active
scrollkeeper port. Upgrading scrollkeeper may have deactivated
scrollkeeper without activating rarian, leading to the empty state
that William saw
it with
sudo port -f uninstall rarian ; sudo port install rarian ?
I think I might understand the problem now. At some point port may
have attempted to activate, and been blocked by the then active
scrollkeeper port. Upgrading scrollkeeper may have deactivated
scrollkeeper without activating rarian
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 1:55 AM, William Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dang it all
you have fixed scrollkeeper so I cant re-install it but now I cant install
half the gnome updates because they want scrollkeeper!
Im disgussted
There are no ports that depend on scrollkeeper. None
On Apr 6, 2008, at 4:26 AM, Randall Wood wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 1:55 AM, William Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
dang it all
you have fixed scrollkeeper so I cant re-install it but now I cant
install
half the gnome updates because they want scrollkeeper!
Im disgussted
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 10:48 AM, William Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 6, 2008, at 4:26 AM, Randall Wood wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 1:55 AM, William Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
dang it all
you have fixed scrollkeeper so I cant re-install it but now I cant
install
On Apr 4, 2008, at 9:08 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Please file a ticket if one does not already exist.
On Apr 4, 2008, at 14:19, William Davis wrote:
For gunucash-docs: the dependentcy on scrollkeeper needs to be
removed and rarian substitued.
Ticket #14926 (new defect)
Opened 3 seconds
, 2008, at 14:19, William Davis wrote:
For gunucash-docs: the dependentcy on scrollkeeper needs to be removed and
rarian substitued.
Ticket #14926 (new defect)
Opened 3 seconds ago
For gunucash-docs: the dependentcy on scrollkeeper needs to be removed and
rarian substitued
For gunucash-docs: the dependentcy on scrollkeeper needs to be removed
and rarian substitued.
William Davis
frstanATbellsouthDOTnet
Mac OS X.5.2 Darwin 9.2.2
Xquartz 2.2.0 - (xorg-server 1.3.0-apple13)
Mac Mini Intel Duo @ 1.86 GHz
Mundus vult decepi, ego non
Please file a ticket if one does not already exist.
On Apr 4, 2008, at 14:19, William Davis wrote:
For gunucash-docs: the dependentcy on scrollkeeper needs to be
removed and rarian substitued.
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users
On Mar 30, 2008, at 11:33 AM, Randall Wood wrote:
I know that rarian is supposed to be a drop-in replacement for
scrollkeeper. but is it really?
Yes, scrollkeeper has been deprecated in Gnome 2.22: rarian
provides its own substitutes of the scrollkeeper-* commands
required for backward
Does the rarian port completely obsolete scrollkeeper or does it
merely conflict with scrollkeeper?
I'm getting the following message and am wondering if I can simply
uninstall scrollkeeper and replace all dependencies on it with a
dependency on rarian?
--- Activating rarian 0.8.0_0
Error
:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/
opt/local/var/macports/build/
_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_ports_textp
roc_scrollkeeper/work/destroot/opt/local/bin
; \echo `date +\%b %d %X\` Installing ScrollKeeper
`scrollkeeper-config --version`...
/opt/local
/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_ports_textproc_scrollkeeper/work/destroot/opt/local/bin
; \echo `date +\%b %d %X\` Installing ScrollKeeper
`scrollkeeper-config --version`...
/opt/local/var/macports/build
Upon attempting to install scrollkeeper, it builds but I get errors
when trying to destroot. Here's a dump:
--- Staging scrollkeeper into destroot
. missing (directory not created: File exists)
./Applications missing (directory not created: File exists)
./Developer missing (directory
/macports/build/
_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_ports_textpro
c_scrollkeeper/work/destroot/opt/local/bin/scrollkeeper-rebuilddb -q -
p /opt/local/var/macports/build/
_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_ports_textpro
c_scrollkeeper/work/destroot/opt
This is a problem with the gramps port, not scrollkeeper.
Although many packages run scrollkeeper-update when make
install (destroot phase) is run, they SHOULD (note the should) have
a disable-scrollkeeper configure flag to allow them to be packaged
(in ports, rpms, etc) without borking
--- Activating gramps 2.2.6_0
Error: Target com.apple.activate returned: Image error: /opt/local/
var/lib/scrollkeeper/am/scrollkeeper_cl.xml already exists and does
not belong to a registered port. Unable to activate port gramps.
Warning: the following items did not execute (for gramps
anyone know what causes this annoyance?
white:~ root# port -f install scrollkeeper
--- Fetching scrollkeeper
--- Verifying checksum(s) for scrollkeeper
--- Extracting scrollkeeper
--- Configuring scrollkeeper
--- Building scrollkeeper with target all
--- Staging scrollkeeper
Fixed in changeset 24191. Do a port sync and try again in not less
than 12 hours.
On 18 Apr 2007, at 21:31, paul beard wrote:
anyone know what causes this annoyance?
white:~ root# port -f install scrollkeeper
--- Fetching scrollkeeper
--- Verifying checksum(s) for scrollkeeper
On Apr 18, 2007, at 6:36 PM, Randall Wood wrote:
Fixed in changeset 24191. Do a port sync and try again in not less
than 12 hours.
Well, I uninstalled and installed it again and it seems OK now.
Thanks. it was holding up something else from building.
On Dec 9, 2006, at 22:11, McGarry Vince wrote:
Scrollkeeper does not activate with the following error:
--- Activating scrollkeeper 0.3.14_2
Error: Target com.apple.activate returned: Image error: /opt/local/
var/lib/scrollkeeper/am/scrollkeeper_cl.xml already exists and does
not belong
Scrollkeeper does not activate with the following error:
--- Activating scrollkeeper 0.3.14_2
Error: Target com.apple.activate returned: Image error: /opt/local/
var/lib/scrollkeeper/am/scrollkeeper_cl.xml already exists and does
not belong to a registered port. Unable to activate port
28 matches
Mail list logo
