Strange I thought I'd set a DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH in my .profile, but I
must have done that as a one-off way back the last time I needed
mpg123. Adding
export DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/local/lib/mpg123:/opt/local/lib
to my .profile did the trick.
Thanks!
Watts
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:28 AM,
On Dec 2, 2009, at 10:39, Andrew Watts wrote:
Strange I thought I'd set a DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH in my .profile, but I
must have done that as a one-off way back the last time I needed
mpg123. Adding
export DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/local/lib/mpg123:/opt/local/lib
to my .profile did the trick.
I am trying to use a binary package that also relies on python. But it seems
to expect the default apple python to be installed. So, I have run:
sudo python_select python26-apple
Yet when I run the binary, I see the following:
Python 2.5.4 found.
Or, if I run a different version of the
On Dec 2, 2009, at 12:03, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
I am trying to use a binary package that also relies on python. But it seems
to expect the default apple python to be installed. So, I have run:
sudo python_select python26-apple
Yet when I run the binary, I see the following:
Python
On Dec 1, 2009, at 16:50, Jochen Küpper wrote:
Does rpm-vercomp know that 4.6.0 is greater than 4.6.0-rc1? If not, the
epoch should be increased.
Hah, good catch, thanks.
I’ve added epoch 1”
Thanks.
Will qt4-mac also be updated to this version?
I guess so;-)
Looks like there's
On Dec 2, 2009, at 10:08 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 12:03, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
I am trying to use a binary package that also relies on python. But it
seems to expect the default apple python to be installed. So, I have run:
sudo python_select python26-apple
Yet
On Dec 2, 2009, at 10:08 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 12:03, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
I am trying to use a binary package that also relies on python. But it
seems to expect the default apple python to be installed. So, I have run:
sudo python_select python26-apple
Yet
On Dec 2, 2009, at 12:22, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 10:08 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I wonder how it is finding python, or if there is a way to tell it which
python to use.
I don't know how it is finding it. But when GRASS starts, it opens a
terminal and reports some
On 02.12.2009, at 19:18, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Will qt4-mac also be updated to this version?
I guess so;-)
Looks like there's already a ticket filed for that too.
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/22743
Maybe we should resolve issues (like your ticket below) and also wait for
4.6.1
Hello,
I encountered the following error when trying to install gnustep:
--- Fetching Etoile
Error: Target org.macports.fetch returned: Subversion check out failed
Error: The following dependencies failed to build: GNUMail Etoile
Pantomime PRICE TalkSoup netclasses Yap.app ImageMagick
Hello,
Running:
sudo port install gnustep
I ran into the following violation warnings:
Warning: violation by /opt/local/GNUstep
Warning: gnustep-gui violates the layout of the ports-filesystems!
Warning: Please fix or indicate this misbehavior (if it is intended),
it
Hello,
I do not know what is deprecated either. I guess there will have to
be a discussion with the etoile people.
On Dec 2, 2009, at 1:52 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
According to etoile website, the etoile runtime is now officially
deprecated.
I did read that, but is the Etoile port
On Dec 2, 2009, at 16:03, Frank J. R. Hanstick wrote:
Warning: violation by /opt/local/GNUstep
Warning: gnustep-gui violates the layout of the ports-filesystems!
Warning: Please fix or indicate this misbehavior (if it is intended), it will
be an error in future releases!
Hello,
I wish I could retrace the installation history to determine how the
situation occurred.
On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 16:03, Frank J. R. Hanstick wrote:
--- Activating python26 @2.6.4_0+darwin
Error: Target org.macports.activate returned:
Is this correct behavior:
$port livecheck apache2
Returns nothing. Using -d, I get the last line of apache2 seems to
be up to date, which I would think should be shown regardless of -d
or not.
port -d livecheck apache2
DEBUG: Found port in
On Dec 2, 2009, at 16:51, Scott Haneda wrote:
Is this correct behavior:
$port livecheck apache2
Returns nothing.
Yes, it's correct. I think it's modeled on other UNIX tools, where no output
is understood to mean success.
It's helpful when I do something like port livecheck
On Dec 2, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 16:51, Scott Haneda wrote:
Is this correct behavior:
$port livecheck apache2
Returns nothing.
Yes, it's correct. I think it's modeled on other UNIX tools, where
no output is understood to mean success.
It's helpful when
17 matches
Mail list logo
