On Mar 16, 2014, at 20:13, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
You might consider checking that the destination of your symlink has
appropriate permissions. My guess is something over there no longer matches
up.
You could have had a point with permissions of the symlink, but in the end the
issue was
Hi,
On Mar 16, 2014, at 18:05, Chris Jones wrote:
Well yes, of course. I was thinking as much as a test, to see if its the
optimisations that are the issue, as it is for me, than as a solution. In my
case i simply could not compile at all without -O0... without it, the memory
usage hit
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014, at 09:36 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Sunday March 16 2014 18:42:53 you wrote:
about for some project that's using QtGui via QMake, for which removing
the linking with Carbon worked? I've never tried the former, and the
latter could easily work depending on the
Hi:
I re-purposed a Core2 Duo mini running 10.7.5 over the weekend. I'm
trying to set up Time Machine to backup the machine and it is running
very slowly (est 20+ hours for a 56 GB backup).
It may not be related to the slow Time Machine backup, but I'm
getting the following Console message
On 18 Mar 2014, at 3:00 am, macports-users-requ...@lists.macosforge.org wrote:
Yeah, that was all I meant by saying on Mountain Lion and higher was that
it was conditionally declared like that; I did *not* mean to imply that I
was on Mountain Lion myself... (I am actually still on Snow
On 17/03/2014, at 8:51 AM, Eric Gallager wrote:
Yeah, that was all I meant by saying on Mountain Lion and higher was that
it was conditionally declared like that; I did not mean to imply that I was
on Mountain Lion myself... (I am actually still on Snow Leopard so `port
notes gdb-apple`
On 18 Mar 2014, at 3:00 am, macports-users-requ...@lists.macosforge.org wrote:
Well yes, of course. I was thinking as much as a test, to see if its the
optimisations that are the issue, as it is for me, than as a solution. In my
case i simply could not compile at all without -O0... without
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Ian Wadham iandw...@gmail.com wrote:
1. The check seems to be to prevent a program from starting a
foreign process that could compromise the O/S (e.g. spyware?).
In the long term, should MacPorts be recomending bypassing it
with the -p and -s
Thanks, Brandon. You have given me some leads I can get my teeth
into … or google. And you dated me pretty accurately re SVR4. I knew
quite a bit about UNIX before that, but System V Release 4 was my first
hands-on experience --- 1989-1998, with H-P, Sun, Prime and ICL.
Cheers, Ian W.
On
On Mar 12, 2014, at 2:12 PM, Art McGee amc...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that the presentation of the case for supporting MacPorts was
confusing and unconvincing, so usage statistics are not going to help in that
matter.
I’ve been wondering why Homebrew has such huge momentum and
I’m on Mavricks with MacPorts 2.2.1
I recently upgraded the meld port (@1.8.4), and now when ever I try to run it,
it blows up with an OSError.
(OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denied:
'/opt/local/share/meld/recent-NbPmhP.meldcmp’ )
Looking into it, it appears that the problem is that meld
11 matches
Mail list logo
