On 24 Jan 2009, at 03:46, Rainer Müller wrote:
Bryan Blackburn wrote:
Personally, I'd like to see direct mode deprecated, and when 10.3
support is
officially dropped, it can be removed entirely. Other than the old
performance issues with the large number of hardlinks, I don't see
any
So... :)
This trickle down effect of needing A, to find it needs B and C, and
that B and C need D and E, and that can go on a while. Look what I
did...
( One small issue with the mysql connector still, and I have a few
questions about how to chain these all together, since there is an
I have successfully accomplished this... but frankly the process just
doesn't sit well with my sense of things.. I now have two complete
Apache installations... and have to do work arounds to get the port
installation to work
(apache2ctl etc)
Isn't there away to install the port version
Jason Hirsh wrote:
I have successfully accomplished this... but frankly the process just
doesn't sit well with my sense of things.. I now have two complete
Apache installations... and have to do work arounds to get the port
installation to work
(apache2ctl etc)
Isn't there away to
On Jan 24, 2009, at 5:16 AM, Jason Hirsh wrote:
I have successfully accomplished this... but frankly the process
just doesn't sit well with my sense of things.. I now have two
complete Apache installations... and have to do work arounds to
get the port installation to work
(apache2ctl
2009/1/24 Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org
On Jan 23, 2009, at 09:11, tim...@rochester.rr.com
tim...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
Joshua Root j...@macports.org wrote:
Timothy Lee wrote:
Do you know if its possible for me (on leopard) to build x86 code (all
my macports ports) that will
Scott Haneda wrote:
Ports needs some caution as well, as an upgrade, iirc, can nuke your
settings as well.
If you're thinking of this, it's been fixed:
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/8605
- Josh
___
macports-users mailing list
Scott Haneda wrote:
I think this is telling:
- ERROR: Net::DNS::Resolver::Programmable is not installed
- ERROR: Error is not installed
- ERROR: NetAddr::IP is not installed
- ERROR: version is not installed
* Optional prerequisite NetAddr::IP is not installed
I can probably find
Hi folks
I'm completely stuck installing apache2. No idea what exactly is going
wrong. It's a clean macports install (1.700). I even ran a manual
selfupdate. Installing git-core went flawless, it's just apache2 that is
causing problems. Thanks for helping me out.
$ sudo port install apache2
Thanks for the reply Harry-
I'm fairly sure that I will need to lipo together the builds for
Musicbrainz' Picard.
So - in your experience what are all the options that I must set after
a fresh src install to have a 10.5 setup building binaries for 10.4?
Also, does anyone know how UB deals
On Jan 24, 2009, at 3:36 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jan 23, 2009, at 09:11, tim...@rochester.rr.com tim...@rochester.rr.com
wrote:
Joshua Root j...@macports.org wrote:
Timothy Lee wrote:
Do you know if its possible for me (on leopard) to build x86 code
(all
my macports ports) that will
Timothy Lee wrote:
On Jan 24, 2009, at 3:36 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jan 23, 2009, at 09:11, tim...@rochester.rr.com
tim...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
Joshua Root j...@macports.org wrote:
Timothy Lee wrote:
Do you know if its possible for me (on leopard) to build x86 code (all
my
2009/1/24 Timothy Lee tim...@rochester.rr.com
Thanks for the reply Harry-I'm fairly sure that I will need to lipo together
the builds for Musicbrainz' Picard.
So - in your experience what are all the options that I must set after a
fresh src install to have a 10.5 setup building binaries for 10.4?
Harry-
You made reference to adding the -x11 tag to your variants.conf.
By doing this, do you force macports to use Apple's X11? Or is it
something else entirely different?
thanks
On Jan 24, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
2009/1/24 Timothy Lee tim...@rochester.rr.com
Thanks
It is something completely different. Most linux, netbsd and freebsd
packages rely on X11. MacOSX has support for x11 but the native windowing
system of MacOSX is aqua. Using the -x11 option means that you don't build
for X11. An increasing amount of binaries and libraries support native aqua
and
If direct mode is removed, I will use the following to work around:
port destroot foo
rsync -tpogHlr /opt/local/var/macports/build/foo/work/destroot/opt/local /opt
[or wherever the destroot is]
This would effectively turn macports into a simple way to build packages
based on the maintainer's
Hmm.. thats interesting.
So, does that imply that aqua provides a X11-like API (w/ libs) or
does that mean that the actual people writing packages (like
openoffice) need to support aqua calls conditionally compiled in on
detection of the aqua include/libs?
thanks
On Jan 24, 2009, at 1:25
It's definitely not the first. I assume they added code to support aqua and
it's API's.
I'm not a developer. just google for answers :)
Harry
2009/1/24 Timothy Lee tim...@rochester.rr.com
Hmm.. thats interesting.So, does that imply that aqua provides a X11-like
API (w/ libs) or does that mean
and also I have in my .bash_profile this export:
export CXXFLAGS=-I /opt/local/include;
Usually this should go into CPPFLAGS as it is for the preprocessor.
Also, check that the Makefile or build system is honoring the
environment variables.
Maybe you need to pass this directly to make
Exact same settings as below (except I'm only building i386), yet I'm
still seeing DEBUG: Environment: MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET='10.5'.
Any Ideas?
Also - I'm seeing Warning: Please fix or indicate this misbehavior
(if it is intended) on every install saying that /mopt/local/bin is
in
anyone have any luck on this? I've got the same hang, and it blocks me from
installing gnucash.
I don't know much about slib or guile, or maybe I'd look into the code
myself...
TIA-
dan
Charles Day wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Bryan Blackburn b...@macports.org wrote:
On
I'm failing on installing ncurses (w/ +universal variant).
I tried the instructions from this old post:
David,
In answer to your question, yes. There is a bug that has already been
reported. You will have to clean ncurses and run the following
commands
in this exact order:
sudo port -v
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 12:15 PM, danstadler danstad...@gmail.com wrote:
anyone have any luck on this? I've got the same hang, and it blocks me
from
installing gnucash.
The gnucash port depends on slib-guile16, not slib-guile, so it should still
be installable. It works for me. Are you
On Jan 24, 2009, at 10:19, Geert De Deckere wrote:
I'm completely stuck installing apache2. No idea what exactly is
going wrong. It's a clean macports install (1.700). I even ran a
manual selfupdate. Installing git-core went flawless, it's just
apache2 that is causing problems. Thanks for
On Jan 24, 2009, at 14:01, Timothy Lee wrote:
Exact same settings as below (except I'm only building i386), yet
I'm still seeing DEBUG: Environment:
MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET='10.5'.
Any Ideas?
Only building i386 -- does that mean you are not using the +universal
variant? If so, the
On Jan 24, 2009, at 07:48, Scott Haneda wrote:
On Jan 24, 2009, at 5:16 AM, Jason Hirsh wrote:
I have successfully accomplished this... but frankly the process
just doesn't sit well with my sense of things.. I now have two
complete Apache installations... and have to do work arounds to
26 matches
Mail list logo
