On May 16, 2012, at 01:13, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
Thanks. Sounds simple enough, although one question. I had 2.0.?. It
crashed before I upgraded to 2.1.0. So I assume that I should instead us an
older installer, then once all is working do the upgrade to 2.1.0. Or will
the 2.1.0
You probably missed the postactivate message from xinit. I suggest you 'sudo
port -f deactivate xinit sudo port activate xinit' to get the appropriate
message for your configuration.
--Jeremy
On May 15, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Frank Schima macsforever2...@macports.org wrote:
Hi all,
On a
Under /opt/local/etc/macports I have both a macports.conf and
macports.conf.default file. The first seems to be from 2010 and the
latter from today. I guess the port command should be reading the
newer, but the documentation on the web (and using 'man port' and 'man
macports.conf') says that
Hi,
The new Macports 2.1.0 provide a way to choose the PHP version.
I want to use sometime PHP 5.3 or PHP 5.4, so i've installed PHP53 and PHP54.
I've discoverd a way to select the PHP version I want to use : sudo
port select php [phpPortName] (ie. php53 or php54).
If this way works for PHP
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:22 AM, M A markoil...@gmail.com wrote:
Under /opt/local/etc/macports I have both a macports.conf and
macports.conf.default file. The first seems to be from 2010 and the
latter from today. I guess the port command should be reading the
newer, but the documentation on
On May 15, 2012, at 11:26 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On May 16, 2012, at 01:13, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
Thanks. Sounds simple enough, although one question. I had 2.0.?. It
crashed before I upgraded to 2.1.0. So I assume that I should instead us an
older installer, then once all is
Responses from Ryan:
So, port select php only provides a way to select the PHP cli version ?
It's seem not too hard to extend the script to take into account the
Apache module ?
I don't think there's any point to selecting an Apache module, is there?
Surely it's not too difficult to type the
On May 16, 2012, at 11:37, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
And, I have another problem, that is only partially related to macports, but
figured I would ask.
When I went to install macports 2.1, it complained that I didn't have xcode
installed. I checked, and while my developer folder is present,
When I update emacs, I get a binary named emacs-23.4 instead of an
updated emacs. Is there a good reason for this behavior?
I can think of several reasons why it is not good, and the port
message displays no information about this, nor does the build
message.
What gives?
Sincerely,
Watson Ladd
--
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Watson Ladd watsonbl...@gmail.com wrote:
When I update emacs, I get a binary named emacs-23.4 instead of an
updated emacs. Is there a good reason for this behavior?
I would guess it's being prepared for a port select mechanism to replace
multiple ports owning
On May 16, 2012, at 10:22, M A wrote:
Under /opt/local/etc/macports I have both a macports.conf and
macports.conf.default file. The first seems to be from 2010 and the
latter from today. I guess the port command should be reading the
newer, but the documentation on the web (and using 'man
On May 16, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On May 16, 2012, at 11:37, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
And, I have another problem, that is only partially related to macports, but
figured I would ask.
When I went to install macports 2.1, it complained that I didn't have xcode
installed.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:09:21PM -0500, Watson Ladd wrote:
When I update emacs, I get a binary named emacs-23.4 instead of an
updated emacs. Is there a good reason for this behavior?
I can think of several reasons why it is not good, and the port
message displays no information about this,
Apparently this may have been due to some caching... I now get the
expected behavior.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Dan Ports dpo...@macports.org wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:09:21PM -0500, Watson Ladd wrote:
When I update emacs, I get a binary named emacs-23.4 instead of an
updated
On 16 May 2012, at 6:07am, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
Removing macports-dev since this isn't a development issue.
Not sure I agree there.
On May 16, 2012, at 12:59 a.m., Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
Is there something I can do to switch this progess thingy off ???
I'm not sure if
By the way, some php libraries, like APC, Pear aren't provided with
the both new php ports (php53 php54). Can we expect to see them back
(like with php5 old port) ?
I am in the process of converting the PHP extensions. APC is on the list, but
is on the list of extensions that are a little
Clemens Lang wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:17:02PM +0100, Chris Jones wrote:
Is there something I can do to switch this progess thingy off ???
disabling the feature isn't really the same thing as just disabling
the eye-candy progress count-down. I suspect you are not the only one
who
On May 16, 2012, at 3:51 PM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
Clemens Lang wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:17:02PM +0100, Chris Jones wrote:
Is there something I can do to switch this progess thingy off ???
disabling the feature isn't really the same thing as just disabling
the eye-candy
On May 16, 2012, at 17:42, Wilks, Daniel wrote:
I'm also anxiously waiting for php54-memcache along with php54-pear. I keep
looking for tickets that might indicate their progress but either they don't
exist or I don't know the magic search sauce. Seriously though, thanks for
the effort
On May 16, 2012, at 3:42 PM, Wilks, Daniel wrote:
By the way, some php libraries, like APC, Pear aren't provided with
the both new php ports (php53 php54). Can we expect to see them back
(like with php5 old port) ?
I am in the process of converting the PHP extensions. APC is on the list,
Code by Kevin has released PortAuthority 5.0, a GUI for the MacPorts
Unix software management system for Mac OS X.
PortAuthority provides a graphical user interface for the MacPorts
software management system for Mac OS X. MacPorts is a powerful
command-line tool for installing and updating a
On 5/16/12 10:23 PM, Kevin Walzer wrote:
Mac OS X 10.6 is the minimum supported OS.
CORRECTION: PortAuthority now requires 10.7.
--
Kevin Walzer
Code by Kevin
http://www.codebykevin.com
___
macports-users mailing list
22 matches
Mail list logo
