Re: startup items for dbus and dovecot2

2011-06-08 Thread Dan Ports
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:59:25PM +0100, Andrew Long wrote: Thanks for that - it let me get rid of the two old launchctl items and put them back in place correctly. However, it hasn't fixed the problem with gnome-session failing to start - I'm still getting the 'operation not permitted' on

Re: startup items for dbus and dovecot2

2011-06-06 Thread Andrew Long
On 4 Jun 2011, at 23:47, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jun 4, 2011, at 17:23, Mark Hattam wrote: Having just done port updates for dbus and dovecot2 this evening, they both printed out similar guidance messages about startup items. But I don't understand why dbus uses launchctl load whereas

Re: startup items for dbus and dovecot2

2011-06-06 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
On Jun 6, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Andrew Long wrote: On 4 Jun 2011, at 23:47, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jun 4, 2011, at 17:23, Mark Hattam wrote: Having just done port updates for dbus and dovecot2 this evening, they both printed out similar guidance messages about startup items. But I

Re: startup items for dbus and dovecot2

2011-06-06 Thread Andrew Long
On 6 Jun 2011, at 18:27, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: On Jun 6, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Andrew Long wrote: On 4 Jun 2011, at 23:47, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jun 4, 2011, at 17:23, Mark Hattam wrote: Having just done port updates for dbus and dovecot2 this evening, they both printed out

startup items for dbus and dovecot2

2011-06-04 Thread Mark Hattam
Having just done port updates for dbus and dovecot2 this evening, they both printed out similar guidance messages about startup items. But I don't understand why dbus uses launchctl load whereas dovecot uses port load ... is there a difference?

Re: startup items for dbus and dovecot2

2011-06-04 Thread Ryan Schmidt
with dovecot2. dbus has two startup items, so it can't use MacPorts code to create them, and furthermore needs one of them started as root, the other not as root. Therefore it prints its own instructions. # Startup items have