On May 9, 2021, at 17:07, Gerben Wierda wrote:
> I relied on the fact that man page/help of reclaim said it would not remove
> active installs. So, having read that, I assumed it was unable to damage the
> running setup and I assumed it would only remove everything inactive, compile
>
You've summed up the situation nicely.
On May 9, 2021, at 21:18, Kastus Shchuka wrote:
> Macports has ports of both openssl and libressl but they are mutually
> exclusive as they install overlapping files. Binary precompiled packages are
> built with openssl, so folks using libressl have to
On May 10, 2021, at 7:30 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> Is macports as a project going to drop support for libressl? (Several linux
>> distros, e.g. gentoo and void, did it recently).
>> It would be nice to have libressl in macports, but if the project does not
>> have resources to support it,
Thanks Ryan!
I have filed https://trac.macports.org/ticket/62858 for rust.
> On May 10, 2021, at 4:30 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> You've summed up the situation nicely.
>
>
> On May 9, 2021, at 21:18, Kastus Shchuka wrote:
>
>> Macports has ports of both openssl and libressl but they are
Too late now, but IMO, if it had been three state (tag absent as well as
unrequested and requested values) from the first introduction of that tag, and
automatic assignment of "unrequested" was conservative enough, then one
wouldn't have to tag everything one wanted to keep as requested. In
I agree that the implementation could be better - it doesn't look
super-complicated, perhaps making this less surprising/less destructive would
be a good first project for someone interested in working on macports-base?
> On May 10, 2021, at 3:53 AM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> Too late now,
Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On May 9, 2021, at 12:20 PM, Gerben Wierda via macports-users
> wrote:
>> Anyway, the hard lesson was: reclaim is not ’safe’. I thought, reclaim
>> would only remove inactive installs, but it removed active ones as well.
>>
>> It is not possible for me to retrace
> "Bjarne" == Bjarne D Mathiesen writes:
Bjarne> port -q installed \
Bjarne> | awk '{print $1}' \
Bjarne> | xargs -n1 port setrequested
Isn't that just
sudo port setrequested installed
Or am I missing something?
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503
> Isn't that just sudo port setrequested installed
That’s what I’ve always done to avoid this, also having been burned by it once
years ago:
sudo port setrequested installed
sudo port -v reclaim
K
On 2021-05-10 at 11:43:56 UTC-0400 (Mon, 10 May 2021 17:43:56 +0200)
Bjarne D Mathiesen
is rumored to have said:
Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On May 9, 2021, at 12:20 PM, Gerben Wierda via macports-users
wrote:
Anyway, the hard lesson was: reclaim is not ’safe’. I thought,
reclaim would only
10 matches
Mail list logo
