Thank you, Ian.
You saved me at least another two days of struggling.
To return the favor - sorry for posting the info way outside of the list's
subject - I have switched to Pathfinder exactly for the sake of the font and
color control. It's no Krusader though :(
Thank you once again
~Andrey
On May 27, 2013, at 21:41, Dan Aldrich wrote:
I was thinking more of an interface like what sourceforge offers.
Recommendations and number of d/l's a week. The comments make it sound like
more trouble than it's worth.
Sourceforge tracks downloads per file, so if you want that information
Okay, did the sudo port -d sync again to get a verbose output, and it
updated quite a few items.
Here is the last of it:
Total number of ports parsed: 8179
Ports successfully parsed: 8179
Ports failed: 0
Up-to-date ports skipped: 8927
The list is quite long on
On May 28, 2013, at 13:25, Madden, Lisa E. (GSFC-619.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC]
wrote:
And went back to the prompt, no errors!! Am wondering if doing this in
verbose mode forced it to add the items it needed?
Verbose mode shouldn't behave any different, other than to show you more output.
That is what I would have thought, but I first ran just plain port sync,
got the error, then did port -d sync and it ran thru a ton of
updates/adds, then port sync again, and no error.
This is a virtual Monday for a lot of us who had yesterday off on holiday
I guessŠ.we'll blame that.
Thanks,
While download statistics might not be a good system, I do concur that MacPorts
very much would benefit from having a discovery mechanism by which users find
out about useful ports. Searching is nice, but it's not discovery. Some kind
of top ports list (however implemented) would be useful,
Hi,
On 28 May 2013, at 08:12 PM, Jean-François Caron jfca...@phas.ubc.ca wrote:
While download statistics might not be a good system, I do concur that
MacPorts very much would benefit from having a discovery mechanism by which
users find out about useful ports. Searching is nice, but it's
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Chris Jones jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.ukwrote:
Hi,
On 28 May 2013, at 08:12 PM, Jean-François Caron jfca...@phas.ubc.ca
wrote:
While download statistics might not be a good system, I do concur that
MacPorts very much would benefit from having a discovery
Hi,
On 28 May 2013, at 10:14 PM, Stephen Rasku macpo...@srasku.net wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Chris Jones jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
On 28 May 2013, at 08:12 PM, Jean-François Caron jfca...@phas.ubc.ca wrote:
While download statistics might not be a good system, I
Please excuse typos--sent from my iPhone.
On 2013-05-28, at 5:35 PM, Chris Jones jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
On 28 May 2013, at 10:14 PM, Stephen Rasku macpo...@srasku.net wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Chris Jones jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk
wrote:
Hi,
On 28 May
On May 28, 2013, at 16:56, Craig Treleaven wrote:
I'd like to know that a port has been successfully installed, recently. IOW
that it hasn't suffered bitrot!
To some degree, you can answer that already, by checking if there is a recent
package on the packages server.
To answer it with
Hi,
On 28 May 2013, at 10:59 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
On May 28, 2013, at 16:56, Craig Treleaven wrote:
I'd like to know that a port has been successfully installed, recently. IOW
that it hasn't suffered bitrot!
To some degree, you can answer that already, by
On May 28, 2013, at 17:17, Chris Jones wrote:
On 28 May 2013, at 10:59 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On May 28, 2013, at 16:56, Craig Treleaven wrote:
I'd like to know that a port has been successfully installed, recently.
IOW that it hasn't suffered bitrot!
To some degree, you can answer
On May 27, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
On May 27, 2013, at 14:11, Johannes Kastl wrote:
3. How to get intltool to use p5.16 instead of 5.12 for its
dependencies? Reinstalling gimp2 and inkscape leads to some p5.12-*
modules being installed.
There is
On 29/05/2013, at 6:36 AM, Chris Jones wrote:
What would help users i think would be to have a much better search/browsing
interface, to allow them to browse available ports.
Yes indeed. It is hard to see the wood for the trees. I did some
investigation on this
recently with a view to
On May 28, 2013, at 8:08 PM, Ian Wadham iandw...@gmail.com wrote:
If I picked a fairly specific string, such as quantum or jigsaw, I got
quite good
results, as long as I searched the Full Description as well as the
Description (which
apparently port search does not do by default).
At 5:26 PM -0500 5/28/13, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On May 28, 2013, at 17:17, Chris Jones wrote:
On 28 May 2013, at 10:59 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On May 28, 2013, at 16:56, Craig Treleaven wrote:
I'd like to know that a port has been successfully installed,
recently. IOW that it hasn't
17 matches
Mail list logo
