support for the virtual
machine software as well as full voiceover support in the guest which
is the better option, Fusion or Parallels and why? Note Windows won't
be run as a virtual machine so I'm not worried about Windows screen
reader support in the vm.
--
You received this message because you
stupid that would mess something up system wide instead of just effecting a
single user account on the machine. Since I need both basic voiceover
support for the virtual machine software as well as full voiceover support
in the guest which is the better option, Fusion or Parallels and why? Note
a single user
account on the machine. Since I need both basic voiceover support for the
virtual machine software as well as full voiceover support in the guest which
is the better option, Fusion or Parallels and why? Note Windows won't be run
as a virtual machine so I'm not worried about
account on the machine. Since I need
both basic voiceover support for the virtual machine software as well
as full voiceover support in the guest which is the better option,
Fusion or Parallels and why? Note Windows won't be run as a virtual
machine so I'm not worried about Windows screen reader
for the
virtual machine software as well as full voiceover support in the guest which
is the better option, Fusion or Parallels and why? Note Windows won't be run
as a virtual machine so I'm not worried about Windows screen reader support
in the vm.
--
You received this message because you
I have herd discussion of Fusion on the list but not parallels.
Can people comment on the difference between the two and if one is better with
VO than the other.
In the Journey,
Ron
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
MacVisionaries group.
To
I hear that Parallels has less lag than Fusion does, but all discussion I've
heard regarding Parallels seems to be only that it is inaccessible with VO. I
know of a lot of us VI Mac users who use Fusion. I myself use it and find it to
quite a smooth experience with VO.
Hth,
Rose
On Apr 13,
yeah. 1 works with vo, one doesn't.
get fusion
ash
On 13/04/2011 21:23, Ronald McEwan wrote:
I have herd discussion of Fusion on the list but not parallels.
Can people comment on the difference between the two and if one is better with
VO than the other.
In the Journey,
Ron
--
You
Go with Fusion, parallels is not accessible with voiceover. For some reason,
when parallels was developed, the company chose to use all nonstandard
controls, I have no idea why, but they seem to have no interest in correcting
this.
On Apr 13, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Ronald McEwan wrote:
I have herd
