[maemo-developers] Asterisk 1.2.0 - successfully run on Nokia 770

2005-11-29 Thread Razvan Dragomirescu
Hello everyone,   This device is amazing! I have managed to compile and run the latest version of Asterisk (1.2.0) on the Nokia 770. Some codecs had to be taken out (ilbc and lpc10) and also some of the apps (SMS, SQLite), but the rest of it works great. I have connected a WiFi SIP phone (Zyxel P20

[maemo-developers] Custom backup locations

2005-11-29 Thread Florian Boor
Hi, are custom backup location configurations supposed to work? I'm shipping a configuration file with libgpewidget to make sure all PIM data stored by GPE applications is backed up. The file is located in /var/lib/install/etc/osso-backup/applications/gpe.conf and looks like this: /home/u

Re: [maemo-developers] ipkg vs dpkg

2005-11-29 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tomas Frydrych wrote: > > Kalle Vahlman wrote: > >> Build environment as in the Maemo and packages as in the existing >> dbus/ dir contents (bad wording, sorry). If you need to port all of >> Maemo to a new pkg management just to use ipkg, well... >

Re: [maemo-developers] ipkg vs dpkg

2005-11-29 Thread Tomas Frydrych
Kalle Vahlman wrote: Build environment as in the Maemo and packages as in the existing dbus/ dir contents (bad wording, sorry). If you need to port all of Maemo to a new pkg management just to use ipkg, well... Granted, you need to recreate the packages for AI currently too so perhaps it's no

Re: [maemo-developers] ipkg vs dpkg

2005-11-29 Thread Kalle Vahlman
2005/11/29, Koen Kooi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Kalle Vahlman wrote: > > So we are talking about changing a rarely used utility to save less > > than one percent of the flash space? With modifications to who knows > > what amount of the packages incl

Re: [maemo-developers] ipkg vs dpkg

2005-11-29 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kalle Vahlman wrote: > 2005/11/29, Matthew Allum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>"the 770 is not an embedded system" - OK :) You understand my point >>though - we could argue all week on if my digitial watch for example >>was a small computer or an embedded

Re: [maemo-developers] ipkg vs dpkg

2005-11-29 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 08:46:23PM -0500, ext Russell Nelson wrote: > Instead of tossing out opinions, let's look at some numbers. > I have Debian 2.2 on a server and Familiar 6.2 on a handheld. Since > we're talking about using either dpkg or ipkg on a jffs2 filesystem, > all space consumpt

Re: [maemo-developers] ipkg vs dpkg

2005-11-29 Thread Florian Boor
Hi, Matthew Allum wrote: > Somebody writes something new that kicks arse and addresses the issues > with dpkg and ipkg. that would be a solution, but open source software has a one big advantage: It can be improved to avoid rewriting something from the scratch. We should consider to make use of

Re: [maemo-developers] ipkg vs dpkg

2005-11-29 Thread Kalle Vahlman
2005/11/29, Matthew Allum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "the 770 is not an embedded system" - OK :) You understand my point > though - we could argue all week on if my digitial watch for example > was a small computer or an embedded system. And that wouldn't resolve the real issues with the device which

Re: [maemo-developers] ipkg vs dpkg

2005-11-29 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zeeshan Ali wrote: >>Repeat after me: "the 770 is not an embedded system". It is a small >>computer with neither a qwerty keyboard nor a big hard drive, nor a >>really fast processor. > > >You are kidding, right? Anything is an embedded system i

Re: [maemo-developers] ipkg vs dpkg

2005-11-29 Thread Matthew Allum
Hi; On 11/29/05, Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matthew Allum writes: > > Surely this isn't a fair comparison as the packages in Debian 2.2 > > arn't 'tuned' to embedded use ( i.e include docs, .la files etc etc ). > > You'd be better comparing udebs that make up D-I or something.

Re: [maemo-developers] ipkg vs dpkg

2005-11-29 Thread Zeeshan Ali
> Repeat after me: "the 770 is not an embedded system". It is a small > computer with neither a qwerty keyboard nor a big hard drive, nor a > really fast processor. You are kidding, right? Anything is an embedded system if it: 1. has a small memory and secondary storage 2. has a slow processo

Re: [maemo-developers] ipkg vs dpkg

2005-11-29 Thread Russell Nelson
Matthew Allum writes: > Surely this isn't a fair comparison as the packages in Debian 2.2 > arn't 'tuned' to embedded use ( i.e include docs, .la files etc etc ). > You'd be better comparing udebs that make up D-I or something. I'm only talking about the overhead of the package manager, not the