On 13/09/2006, at 12:47 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Steve Landers schreef:
The first (and perhaps most significant) is to include
'rel="nofollow"'
in all links, and to prominently display the following message on all
edit pages
Wouldn't that also keep a large part of the wiki out of google?
No
-- Forwarded message --
From: Hannu Kotipalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 12-Sep-2006 15:12
Subject: VS: [maemo-developers] spam at maemo wiki
To: Jonathan Matthews-Levine
Looks like I'm not allowed to email to the list; and I won't bother to
create a login just for this mail... ;-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Landers schreef:
> The first (and perhaps most significant) is to include 'rel="nofollow"'
> in all links, and to prominently display the following message on all
> edit pages
Wouldn't that also keep a large part of the wiki out of google?
reg
Devesh
> https://garage.maemo.org/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php/alsa-plugin/?root=dsp-alsa
>
> If I understood this correct, this provides the ALSA interface through
> ALSA-DSP PCM plugin.
would this help with integrating userspace output plugins? I have been
working on alsa plugins for a2dp audio
On 12/09/06, Jonathan Matthews-Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fair enough, thought it wouldn't hurt unless #EditPageViews *
s/thought/though/
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-deve
On 12/09/06, David D. Hagood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Steve Landers wrote:
>
> The first (and perhaps most significant) is to include 'rel="nofollow"'
> in all links, and to prominently display the following message on all
> edit pages
This assumes that spammers are smart enough to read the mes
Steve Landers wrote:
The first (and perhaps most significant) is to include 'rel="nofollow"'
in all links, and to prominently display the following message on all
edit pages
This assumes that spammers are smart enough to read the message,
understand it, and care. Given the evidence, I wo
On 12/09/2006, at 4:39 PM, Frantisek Dufka wrote:
Ferenc Szekely wrote:
Disabling anonymous edits would be temporary only, since it is
against
the idea of the wikis.
I don't mind fixing the frontpage few times until proper solution
is implemented (challenge/response looks ideal). I woul
Ferenc Szekely wrote:
Disabling anonymous edits would be temporary only, since it is against
the idea of the wikis.
I don't mind fixing the frontpage few times until proper solution is
implemented (challenge/response looks ideal). I would disable anonymous
logins only when situation gets wor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ferenc Szekely wrote:
> Disabling anonymous edits would be temporary only, since it is against
> the idea of the wikis.
I would not mind if a login was required. It still enables everybody to
contribute who wants and makes it easier to track changes t
> Hello,
>
> Every now and then we have some nasty "edits" at maemo's wiki. To avoid
> this I have been thinking to disable anonymous edits till we have a
> solution which:
> -either detects spam and reverts a page if necessary, or
> -provides a challenge-response test (captcha [1]) before submitt
Hello,
Every now and then we have some nasty "edits" at maemo's wiki. To avoid
this I have been thinking to disable anonymous edits till we have a
solution which:
-either detects spam and reverts a page if necessary, or
-provides a challenge-response test (captcha [1]) before submitting a
page (Th
12 matches
Mail list logo