On 3 Aug 2007, at 16:32, Eero Tamminen wrote:
Hi,
ext Andy Mulhearn wrote:
On Thursday, August 02, 2007, at 12:11PM, Daniel Stone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 02:05:31AM -0700, ext Andy Mulhearn wrote:
On Thursday, August 02, 2007, at 09:56AM, Eero Tamminen
[EMAIL
On Thursday, August 02, 2007, at 09:56AM, Eero Tamminen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
ext Neil MacLeod wrote:
Quim Gil wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 18:41 +0100, ext Neil MacLeod wrote:
By Diablo, perhaps. We hope so.
I should hope it should be possible to release something as basic as
a
On Thursday, August 02, 2007, at 12:11PM, Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 02:05:31AM -0700, ext Andy Mulhearn wrote:
On Thursday, August 02, 2007, at 09:56AM, Eero Tamminen [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
We certainly know what we've fixed, but the issue
Apart from shutting off the sound thing thsi looks like a N770 cover on mode.
Is that about right?
Even if it's not, it's one I would like to have as well - as a put away for a
while mode,
Andy
On Wednesday, July 11, 2007, at 01:29PM, Andrew Flegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 7/11/07, Igor
On Thursday, February 15, 2007, at 01:09PM, David Hagood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Marius Vollmer wrote:
We would like to get your feedback on these plans, both from the
end-user point of view and from the point of view of package
developers.
Thank you for asking. That attitude is one of
On Thursday, February 15, 2007, at 04:12PM, Marius Vollmer [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
ext Andy Mulhearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So are you looking to move away from the System Upgrade := reflash
device model? If so, then GOOD!
To be honest I prefer this route now, if only from the point
Sounds like a reasonable set of conclusions to me and gets my vote.
The replyto discussion has been going for the best part of a year so it would
be good to put a stake through that one's heart,
Andy
On Wednesday, February 07, 2007, at 07:01AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the feedback.
On Tuesday, February 06, 2007, at 08:05PM, Piotr Pokora [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
This is contrary to my experience. I was able to install xephyr on
debian/sid with zero problems ( apt-get install xserver-xephyr ).
Considering I'm not running the unstable sid release I'd expect this to
user if the user is already a valid unix user. Well duh! It
doesn't look to me like it causes any problems - it's the last step in the
process - but even so, does it imply I should be sticking to Ubuntu?
Andy Mulhearn
___
maemo-developers mailing list
On Tuesday, February 06, 2007, at 04:19PM, Levi Bard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As an aside , installing xephyr on Debian from unstable seems to be a
complete non-starter without ripping out all of your other x apps and
windowing system and a replacing a whole host of other packages as well.
On Thursday, July 20, 2006, at 11:43AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tommi Komulainen wrote:
I see libsqlite0 2.8.13-2 in two repositories / sections:
* under user/libs from Kernel Concepts
* under libs from Maemo repository
I think library packages that
11 matches
Mail list logo
