2006/11/29, Tomi Ollila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
"Kalle Vahlman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2006/11/29, Kalle Vahlman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 2006/11/28, Tomi Ollila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > my wishlist to scratchbox developers:
>> >
>> > 1) make this work (or is there something I did wrong ?) (
"Kalle Vahlman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2006/11/29, Kalle Vahlman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 2006/11/28, Tomi Ollila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > my wishlist to scratchbox developers:
>> >
>> > 1) make this work (or is there something I did wrong ?) (*)
>> > 2) update subversion to at least 1.3 so
2006/11/29, Kalle Vahlman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2006/11/28, Tomi Ollila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> my wishlist to scratchbox developers:
>
> 1) make this work (or is there something I did wrong ?) (*)
> 2) update subversion to at least 1.3 so that svn log --limit=n works.
FWIW, you can install self-c
2006/11/28, Tomi Ollila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
my wishlist to scratchbox developers:
1) make this work (or is there something I did wrong ?) (*)
2) update subversion to at least 1.3 so that svn log --limit=n works.
FWIW, you can install self-compiled tools under /host_usr (which is
visible in al
Marius Gedminas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:22:20PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>> > Also, sb-menu is really neat and scripts seems to work far better. No
>> > glitches yet.
>>
>> I've tried to get this work on Fedora Core 6. I can compile binaries,
>> but making debian
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:22:20PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> > Also, sb-menu is really neat and scripts seems to work far better. No
> > glitches yet.
>
> I've tried to get this work on Fedora Core 6. I can compile binaries,
> but making debian package fails with following line:
>
> dpkg-checkb
"Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 11/23/06, Tran Van Hoang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all
>> I'm wondering if anyone has been using scratchbox 1.x , in stead of the
>> officially supported 0.9.x to play around with mistral/scirocco?
>>
>> If you have, pls kindly dro
On 11/23/06, Tran Van Hoang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all
I'm wondering if anyone has been using scratchbox 1.x , in stead of the
officially supported 0.9.x to play around with mistral/scirocco?
If you have, pls kindly drop me line on the problems you've had or
simply saying you have no prob
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 10:42 +0200, ext Riku Voipio wrote:
> Ilpo Stenberg wrote:
> > I have used scratchbox-1.0.6 (apophis) to compile couple of extra
> > kernel modules
> > (for 2.6.16-2.6.16.rel kernel IST 2006?). I had lot of problems with
> > installation -
> > binary tar balls didn't work, b
Ilpo Stenberg wrote:
I have used scratchbox-1.0.6 (apophis) to compile couple of extra
kernel modules
(for 2.6.16-2.6.16.rel kernel IST 2006?). I had lot of problems with
installation -
binary tar balls didn't work, but .deb -packages did, and so on.
Can you please specify any problems you had
Hi,
I have used scratchbox-1.0.6 (apophis) to compile couple of extra kernel
modules
(for 2.6.16-2.6.16.rel kernel IST 2006?). I had lot of problems with
installation -
binary tar balls didn't work, but .deb -packages did, and so on.
Finally I got it working with instructions here:
http://sy
Hi all
I'm wondering if anyone has been using scratchbox 1.x , in stead of the
officially supported 0.9.x to play around with mistral/scirocco?
If you have, pls kindly drop me line on the problems you've had or
simply saying you have no problems at all. I'd really appreciate it
Thanks in advance,
12 matches
Mail list logo
