Hi,
me too. All my projects are also built for chinook and i even still
have an n800 running chinook for testing reasons.
If chinook is officially be retired, i'll just flash my n800 to diablo
and forget about chinook. I am fine with that.
Till
Am Dienstag 26 Januar 2010 schrieb Cornelius Hald:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 21:52 +0100, Niels Breet wrote:
> It has been quite a while since diablo became the successor of chinook.
>
> I think it is time to make the chinook repository read-only and close down
> the builder instance for it.
I'm still building for all three platforms because I think
On Monday 25 January 2010 21:02:45 Alberto Garcia wrote:
> I actually don't know why this wasn't done earlier. Aren't chinook and
> diablo 100% binary compatible?
No. Applications built for chinook will (generally) run on diablo but not the
other way around (the issue is library version numbers
On Monday 25 January 2010 20:52:36 Niels Breet wrote:
> I think it is time to make the chinook repository read-only and close down
> the builder instance for it.
I still support GPE on chinook and I build new releases for both chinook and
diablo (as well as mistral and bora). It has been over a
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:52:36PM +0100, Niels Breet wrote:
> It has been quite a while since diablo became the successor of
> chinook.
>
> I think it is time to make the chinook repository read-only and
> close down the builder instance for it.
I support that decision.
I actually don't know w
Hi,
It has been quite a while since diablo became the successor of chinook.
I think it is time to make the chinook repository read-only and close down
the builder instance for it.
maemo.org would then support the latest stable releases for each device
generation out there.
gregale for 770
diabl
