Eero Tamminen wrote:
Hi,
(standard disclaimer: below are my personal opinions)
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
Who/where is the best place to contact in regards to my Ovi Store questions?
Today, I received a notice that the Ovi Store is new and improved but
the Maemo section is still
.
-Original Message-
From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org [mailto:maemo-developers-
boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of ext Michael Cronenworth
Sent: 12 May, 2010 16:19
To: maemo-developers@maemo.org
Subject: Re: Why should I write apps for Maemo?
Eero Tamminen wrote:
Hi,
(standard disclaimer: below
Hi,
ext Dawid Lorenz wrote:
On 7 May 2010 09:48, tero.k...@nokia.commailto:tero.k...@nokia.com wrote:
Very good point, seriously. Yet I think Marcin had ever better:
(Hm. Is Maemo showing its Debian roots?)
Good attempt for joke but failed. Debian has 'testing' branch which users can
use,
On 10 May 2010 14:09, Eero Tamminen eero.tammi...@nokia.com wrote:
If the issue is with Browser, just kill it and it will be restarted,
just don't start it too many times in a row or you trigger SW watchdog.
Browser can with long time usage also cause some swap fragmentation
(= extra swap
Hi,
ext Dawid Lorenz wrote:
On 10 May 2010 14:09, Eero Tamminen
eero.tammi...@nokia.commailto:eero.tammi...@nokia.com wrote:
Actually, what I'd love to be able to do is simply flush swap space
periodically. I've noticed that once swap space usage passes approx.
20%, device gradually becomes
Dnia czwartek, 6 maja 2010 o 18:27:34 Eero Tamminen napisał(a):
ext Michael Cronenworth wrote:
At most, the SDK should have been released two weeks ahead of the final
release.
Agree.
Let me write few words about my view on maemo development.
PR 1.2 introduced at least two nice things
Hi
On 7 May 2010 09:53, Marcin Juszkiewicz mar...@juszkiewicz.com.pl wrote:
I wonder what so hard is in making PR 1.1.2 release which will give Qt 4.6 as
standard (rather none of nokia apps use it) with 1.1.3 following it with few
other small updates. We have May now and first talks about
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Andrea Grandi a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
I was wondering the same thing: why is it so hard to provide a 1.1.2
image with Qt 4.6.2 installed?
+1
If PR 1.2 has too many problems to be released before *few* days,
please release a 1.1.2 with the updated qt,
-Original Message-
From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org [mailto:maemo-developers-
boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of ext Nicola Mfb
Sent: 07 May, 2010 11:34
To: Andrea Grandi
Cc: maemo-developers@maemo.org
Subject: Re: Why should I write apps for Maemo?
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10
On 7 May 2010 09:48, tero.k...@nokia.com wrote:
Look, the N900 is a consumer electronics device. That means that normal
people, like your mother, the guy you passed on the street and the person
drinking coffee in a cafe use it. Those people cannot handle crashes and bad
quality. It really is
Hi,
On 7 May 2010 11:44, Dawid Lorenz a...@adl.pl wrote:
Releasing test-and-strictly-developer-aka-geek-oriented images on regular
basis would be simply great. Think of it like extras and
extras-testing/devel - yet not for apps, but full-blown OS images. Normal
users should strictly stay away
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:48 AM, tero.k...@nokia.com wrote:
[forwarding to the list too]
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:48 AM, tero.k...@nokia.com wrote:
[...]
Later on when 4.6 got final it might have made sense, but as Eero said, the
release is based on quality and not calendar. And the 1.2
On Fri, 7 May 2010, tero.k...@nokia.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org [mailto:maemo-developers-
boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of ext Nicola Mfb
Sent: 07 May, 2010 11:34
To: Andrea Grandi
Cc: maemo-developers@maemo.org
Subject: Re: Why should I write
Dnia piątek, 7 maja 2010 o 13:21:53 Matan Ziv-Av napisał(a):
When you say 1.2 tree had moved forward, do you mean that the source
packages in PR1.2 SDK are not the source of the actual packages that
will be in PR1.2? Can we get updated source packages?
Leaked image has newer packages then
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:21 +0200, ext Matan Ziv-Av wrote:
On Fri, 7 May 2010, tero.k...@nokia.com wrote:
...
I am specifically interested in hildon-desktop packages
(hildon-desktop, hildon-home, hildon-status-menu, etc.), and libhildon.
Those are all developed in completely open Gitorious.
On Fri, 7 May 2010, Kimmo Hämäläinen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:21 +0200, ext Matan Ziv-Av wrote:
On Fri, 7 May 2010, tero.k...@nokia.com wrote:
...
I am specifically interested in hildon-desktop packages
(hildon-desktop, hildon-home, hildon-status-menu, etc.), and libhildon.
Those
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 14:13 +0200, ext Matan Ziv-Av wrote:
On Fri, 7 May 2010, Kimmo Hämäläinen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:21 +0200, ext Matan Ziv-Av wrote:
On Fri, 7 May 2010, tero.k...@nokia.com wrote:
...
I am specifically interested in hildon-desktop packages
(hildon-desktop,
I would be already happy if the Qt Simulator in Qt SDK would run like
PR1.2. Currently as it is I'm stuck on my development, because I
cannot test the Qt 4.6.2 Maemo features like
WA_Maemo5PortraitOrientation.
Sascha
___
maemo-developers mailing list
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Sascha Mäkelä sascha.mak...@gmail.com wrote:
I would be already happy if the Qt Simulator in Qt SDK would run like
PR1.2. Currently as it is I'm stuck on my development, because I
Qt simulator doesn't get the maemo specific goodies; it's not PR 1.1
level either,
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
Qt simulator doesn't get the maemo specific goodies; it's not PR 1.1
level either, it's just it'
It's just a modified version of desktop Qt. If you ever feel like
buing a cheap logitech flat keyboard, don't.
cannot
Luckily you can test that stuff in scratchbox...
But scratchbox isn't installable on n900...
--
Benoît HERVIER, Khertan Software - http://khertan.net/
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
Hi Michael!
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
The continued delay of PR 1.2 has caused me to pose this question.
Without customized packaging, I cannot reliably publish applications to the
global maemo.org repositories at this time. Also having APIs in
Daniil Ivanov on 05/06/2010 01:39 AM wrote:
By commercial solution do you mean DRM?
Simply the ability to sell an application for profit. I'm a stanch
anti-DRM supporter.
Thanks,
Michael
___
maemo-developers mailing list
Hi,
(standard disclaimer: below are my personal opinions)
ext Michael Cronenworth wrote:
At most, the SDK should have been released two weeks ahead of the final
release.
Agree.
With a little over a month now on the clock, people can only
begin to speculate as to how poor Nokia's release
24 matches
Mail list logo
