Marius, you are right about different package names.
The idea is that we can have the official development open and at the
same time have the unofficial, having a check point when unofficial
features can still make it to the official release if they are cool and
ready.
ext Ryan Abel wrote:
> On O
On Oct 31, 2008, at 8:14 AM, Quim Gil wrote:
>> That said, I think we can outline a few of the more general ideas
>> that
>> we would like to see for Fremantle.
>
> Exactly. We are asking for features: things that can be described in a
> single text paragraph. UI concepts or mock-ups are not nee
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Still unsure? My fault, then. Let's put it like this:
>
> We want Maemo 5 explorers squeezing Fremantle and making amazing
> end-user ready products out of it.
>
>> Whether existing projects can apply (or, on the contrary, cann
On Oct 31, 2008, at 10:17 AM, tz wrote:
> Nokia has already said they will never support it
> out of the box, so the next best thing would be to have something
> available to fully integrate it.
It's coming in Maemo 5.
--
Ryan Abel
Maemo Community Council chair
_
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would VLC (http://www.videolan.org) be a good client ?
> There was a port for Maemo but it was underpowered.
> It has the capacity to be embedded and could be a very good all-purpose
> (all-codec) media player ...
Perhaps t
