On Tue, July 21, 2009 10:01, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> 2009/7/21 Andrew Flegg :
>
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 09:07, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>>
>>> 2009/7/20 Eero Tamminen :
>>>
I haven't used the autobuilder. Is it possible to see how
many/what packages are in the queue?
>>> Unfortunately
2009/7/21 Andrew Flegg :
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 09:07, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>> 2009/7/20 Eero Tamminen :
>>>
>>> I haven't used the autobuilder. Is it possible to see how many/what
>>> packages are in the queue?
>>>
>> Unfortunately there is no such a possiblility.
>
> When I go to the Extras Assi
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 09:07, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> 2009/7/20 Eero Tamminen :
>>
>> I haven't used the autobuilder. Is it possible to see how many/what
>> packages are in the queue?
>>
> Unfortunately there is no such a possiblility.
When I go to the Extras Assistant web interface, it shows me the
2009/7/21 Eero Tamminen :
> Hi,
>
> ext Ed Bartosh wrote:
>>>
>>> I haven't used the autobuilder. Is it possible to see how many/what
>>> packages are in the queue?
>>>
>>> (if there are lot and/or large/slow to build packages, one would
>>> know not to wait anything to happen very soon...)
>>>
>>
Hi,
ext Ed Bartosh wrote:
>> I haven't used the autobuilder. Is it possible to see how many/what
>> packages are in the queue?
>>
>> (if there are lot and/or large/slow to build packages, one would
>> know not to wait anything to happen very soon...)
>>
> Unfortunately there is no such a possibli
2009/7/20 Eero Tamminen :
>
> I haven't used the autobuilder. Is it possible to see how many/what
> packages are in the queue?
>
> (if there are lot and/or large/slow to build packages, one would
> know not to wait anything to happen very soon...)
>
Unfortunately there is no such a possiblility. A
Hi,
ext Ed Bartosh wrote:
> 2009/6/24 Henrik Hedberg :
>> 1. Upload your library into the extras assistant
>> 2. Wait unspecified time (usually at least ten minutes)
>> 3. See if the build succeeded. If not, go to 1.
>> 4. Wait unspecified time (one hour perhaps) until the library is
>> actually i
2009/6/24 Henrik Hedberg :
> gary liquid wrote:
>
>> if you add NEW calls or references or headers into the library since you
>> last updated, it will FAIL because your app will be trying to load in
>> the older versions.
>
>I believe many of us have had the same problems.
>
Only those, who upl
gary liquid wrote:
> if you add NEW calls or references or headers into the library since you
> last updated, it will FAIL because your app will be trying to load in
> the older versions.
I believe many of us have had the same problems.
> it was something I encountered and pondered whether
i have been caught in this exact scenario recently.
and yes, if the library exists in extras or extras-devel then whilst
building your application it will find and use them.
there is a gotcha though:
if you add NEW calls or references or headers into the library since you
last updated, it will FA
On Jun 24, 2009, at 17:11, Luca Donaggio wrote:
> I'm writing an application (actually a RAW image files viewer, for
> those interested :-) ) which depends at build time from an external
> library. I've already packaged this library and I'm ready to upload
> it to fremantle extras-devel, bu
I'm writing an application (actually a RAW image files viewer, for those
interested :-) ) which depends at build time from an external library. I've
already packaged this library and I'm ready to upload it to fremantle
extras-devel, but I'm wondering ... when I'll be ready to upload the main
app so
12 matches
Mail list logo